Top EU Scientist Warns COVID-19 Vaccine Linked To Sterilization of Women

a reply to: Mandroid7

Distortion of what?

In 1993, WHO announced a “birth-control vaccine” for “family planning”.

That did not happen.

a reply to: Phage

That may not be true.

Zeke Emanuel is one of the people Biden will put on his COVID task force, and Zeke is on record as thinking that the vaccine needs to be equitably distributed worldwide before it reaches everyone in the general US population.

That would mean reaching everyone in the 3rd world as fairly as possible before all of us here get it or have access to it.

a reply to: ketsuko

What does Zeke have to do with worldwide distribution of a vaccine?

a reply to: Phage

Ah, so the US is no longer the leader of the free world now that Biden is apparently going to be installed?

Not that I thought what the US did should ever have been that important, you understand, but it was one of the big negative talking points about ORANGE MAN BAD -- oh, not the leader of the free world ...

a reply to: ketsuko

Ah, so the US is no longer the leader of the free world now that Biden is apparently going to be installed?

What does Zeke have to do with worldwide distribution of a vaccine?

originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: Phage



It's better than this wild Italian guys song in jibberish about the inability to communicate coming across as english.

Nothing is better than that song!

a reply to: igloo

Why is the class composed of only pubescent females.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Mandroid7

Distortion of what?

In 1993, WHO announced a “birth-control vaccine” for “family planning”.

That did not happen.

another study

I'm finding it in other journals as well.
Can you provide a source that leads you to believe this is fake?
A quick goog search brings back a bunch of hits on it.

a reply to: Mandroid7

I'm finding it in other journals as well.

I provided you with the source of the study.

Where did the study go? Anywhere?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: igloo

Why is the class composed of only pubescent females.

I'd blame the 1970's. It looks very wrong through today's eyes. I just love how upbeat and quirky the music is.

a reply to: igloo

Sting knew.

O wild.. I was just telling my pals yesterday that it probably be found in the future to drastically reduce birth rates. Not a bad thing maybe tho..?

a reply to: Starcrossd

If you get tricked into it thinking it was something other than it was and then could never have kids?

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: Doctor Smith

"Pfizer/BioNTech is also inserting an ingredient derived from a marine invertebrate, mNeonGreen, into its vaccine. The ingredient has bioluminescent qualities, making it attractive for medical imaging purposes, but it is unclear why an injected vaccine would need to have that quality. mNeonGreen has unknown antigenicity.

Really, WTF is that all about then hmmmmmm"

Sounds exactly what they give you during an MRI with contrast. Iodine. Almost killed me almost couldn't breath at all, and that's when I found out I'm allergic to shellfish as I've never ate any form of fish in my life prior.

Very curious if a shellfish allergy will get you a pass. Or if there is even a warning.

edit on 12/6/2020 by 772STi because: (no reason given)

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Mandroid7

Distortion of what?

In 1993, WHO announced a “birth-control vaccine” for “family planning”.

That did not happen.

Your study is about a theoretical birth control.

My study is about hiding sterilization in vaccines and who, gates, sanger stuff.

Way different topic.

Again, if you are going to call out my link and say it's fake, at least offer a reason.

Added..props fot the song though. Good stuff

a reply to: Mandroid7

Your study is about a theoretical birth control.

It is about the clinical trials in 1993, the actual study, which is what your claim is about.

Your source begins with a distortion about that. No need to read further.

Distortion has no excuse.

a reply to: Phage

I don't even understand what you are arguing here.

Your claim was it's "distortion"

Because another study was done on actual birthcontrol vs my study about the birth control effects of hcg inside of Tetanus shots.

How and why would you compare the 2?

a reply to: Mandroid7

How any why would you compare the 2?

You did.

a reply to: Phage

I did what you did what I did you did?
What are we 4 now?

Back up your bs stance
Your argument is terrible.
I think were done here.
I don't have time for game players.

a reply to: Mandroid7

Cya