if biden wins should his inauguration be canceled due to covid?

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Then why does he still call himself President "Elect" Biden if he´s already won and not just President Biden?

I guess because he doesn't become President Biden until he's inaugurated , till then he's President Elect because he is the next elected President.

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: carniv0re

Then he´s in for a big surprise. Dominion data packets to Germany werw captured on election night, and people have tracked down 20,000+ the fake voters. More on these things next week.

-MM

Literally there is so much wrong with all of this, I find it hard to fathom why the left are so obstinate when it comes to seeing it. They claim that so far none of the cases have had any merit.

I don't think that is a basis to deny the evidence, but a basis to acknowledge sheer corruption. And if winning 'by any means necessary' is how they would prefer the future to be based?

Not me. And I'm sure not a great many people who this directly affects.

originally posted by: carniv0re

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: carniv0re

Then he´s in for a big surprise. Dominion data packets to Germany werw captured on election night, and people have tracked down 20,000+ the fake voters. More on these things next week.

-MM

Literally there is so much wrong with all of this, I find it hard to fathom why the left are so obstinate when it comes to seeing it. They claim that so far none of the cases have had any merit.

I don't think that is a basis to deny the evidence, but a basis to acknowledge sheer corruption. And if winning 'by any means necessary' is how they would prefer the future to be based?

Not me. And I'm sure not a great many people who this directly affects.

They´ve only got to allow for a full audit to stop all of this, but they won´t even give us that. Why do you think it´s so? Because they all know in their harts that there has been massive election fraud, that´s why.

-MM

a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

There's been a count, a recount and an audit ... if you are speaking of Georgia.

How many times does Mr. Trump need to lose?

a reply to: scrounger

Maybe he can do a drive in event and have a few honk horns.

Because of what all the Democrats and the Democratic Party have said the past year, and how they have treated people in the states where the Democratic Party rules over the people. This is how the inauguration should go:

Outdoors in the usual place.

Everyone has a mask on - everyone even during the swearing in. The bible is not held by the judge but on a podium between the judge and Biden/Harris so they can remain 6 feet apart.

Everyone is 6 feet apart at a minimum - which means the chairs are spread out and few can attend.

NO one can attend on the mall or standing because you can't enforce the 6 feet apart rule and you can't control the mask rule on the mall or usual standing area. Armed military members in dress uniform standing next to every row to enforce the mask rule and to escort people in and out who have to use the restroom to ensure they don't get closer than 6 feet to another person and keep their mask on at all times.

NO family members of legislators or important guests allowed to keep the numbers down, except for the Biden/Harris family.

Each person/family is allowed in and out one at a time, so they will have to start in the wee hours of the AM getting people in and out and will end late in the day getting people in an out.

NO shaking hands! No parties. No receptions. No exceptions!

People will just have to watch on TV who are not on the usual area behind the swearing in.

The inauguration will be as boring as the Democratic Party in their Democratic run states have forced people under their thumb to have for their "celebrations", in other words, NO celebrations.

The Democrats MUST adhere to the same rules they imposed on their masses in Democratic Party run states and cities.

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

Then why does he still call himself President "Elect" Biden if he´s already won and not just President Biden?

I guess because he doesn't become President Biden until he's inaugurated , till then he's President Elect because he is the next elected President.

I can see how some would be ignorant of the history of the title.

We've only been using the term "President-Elect" for 50 years or so.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

There's been a count, a recount and an audit ... if you are speaking of Georgia.

How many times does Mr. Trump need to lose?

Lies, no full audit.

-MM

originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation

There's been a count, a recount and an audit ... if you are speaking of Georgia.

How many times does Mr. Trump need to lose?

Lies, no full audit.

-MM

So now it's a "full" audit ... we call that moving the goalpost.

The audit was the legally prescribed test in Georgia law.

The recount was by hand.

The count has been certified.

a reply to: Gryphon66

with a record low rejection rate, coupled with a record high mail in ballot count, I hope you can try to understand the frustration some of us have with asking that the signatures be looked at again. I don't feel it's unreasonable, but you may.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Gryphon66

with a record low rejection rate, coupled with a record high mail in ballot count, I hope you can try to understand the frustration some of us have with asking that the signatures be looked at again. I don't feel it's unreasonable, but you may.

If that were the only thing that "some of you" were interested in, I would have no problem with it.

Further, I don't have any problem with your opinion or anyone elses' but I will say that I feel free to state the facts of the matter when I see falsehoods posted as fact.

Let's narrow down your claim a bit if you'd like to actually discuss it. Are you speaking of the vote in Georgia?

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Gryphon66

with a record low rejection rate, coupled with a record high mail in ballot count, I hope you can try to understand the frustration some of us have with asking that the signatures be looked at again. I don't feel it's unreasonable, but you may.

If that were the only thing that "some of you" were interested in, I would have no problem with it.

Further, I don't have any problem with your opinion or anyone elses' but I will say that I feel free to state the facts of the matter when I see falsehoods posted as fact.

Let's narrow down your claim a bit if you'd like to actually discuss it. Are you speaking of the vote in Georgia?

I think if election integrity is really important, then we should look at all the vote signatures across the board. But let's be honest here. I actually just want the signatures verified in the key districts in the key states that Biden won. Yes, it's just about turning the election results ATM.

But should that happen and the rejection rate was close to accurate, the complaints would be limited to "Dominion must have stolen it all!" which won't fly without proof. We should have paper ballots to reference and not need the machine tabulation. If we look at the paper ballots, and verify signatures and numbers, I think the excuses from me and mine would quickly be limited to "waaaa, this just isn't fair because feelz".

If everything is as close as it is, and the mail in system was abused, should it be overlooked since it gave you the outcome you preferred? Or is integrity of our system worth something? (that's an appeal to emotion)

You would do it for the kids wouldn't' you?

originally posted by: Gryphon66


Further, I don't have any problem with your opinion or anyone elses' but I will say that I feel free to state the facts of the matter when I see falsehoods posted as fact.

On that I agree. the bullsh!t needs to stop. It muddys the water and makes for nothing but pointless arguments. If it were up to me, we would have to self vet our OP's or face electric shock to Augustus' nipples. Make it so if we bring garbage here, it hurts.

a reply to: network dude

I'll assume we're talking about Georgia then.

Signature verification is the first step in the ballot-counting process.

You're only interested in vote integrity if it turns the election results?

Thanks for your honesty; we're done.

👍

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: network dude

I'll assume we're talking about Georgia then.

Signature verification is the first step in the ballot-counting process.

You're only interested in vote integrity if it turns the election results?

Thanks for your honesty; we're done.

yes we are.

a reply to: SaneThinking

I'm afraid I can't answer you properly as this is not the Mud Pit.

Best.

Well of course it should be canceled.
If he can’t hold a rally he can’t hold a party.

All those dead voters couldn’t attend anyway.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: scrounger

Biden has already said that he will have a virtual inauguration -- no parades, no receptions, etc. -- due to Covid.

If I were Biden, I would probably be more worried about the angry masses with pitchforks thinking Biden is stealing an election than I would be about Covid! Personally, I don't think Biden's up to the challenge of stealing an election, and I doubt he had much (if anything) to do with it.

I'd almost bet they pre-tape it so they can edit out his mistakes. I don't have a quick enough wit to come up with something funny on the spot but it would go something like this:

"I, Joe Biden, do order a pepperoni pizza with the Bill of Rights on top so we can cut it up"

originally posted by: Bluntone22
Well of course it should be canceled.
If he can’t hold a rally he can’t hold a party.

All those dead voters couldn’t attend anyway.

Someeone noted above it's going to be virtual.

And, if you have any evidence of dead people voting that haven't been identified yet, please contact your local elections commission.