China Whistleblower Photos of Alleged Chinese Counterfeit Ballot Printing Operation

Yeah. No proof at all. LOL Ballots ordered from China. Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Vos: Republicans Will Convene Public Hearing on ‘Numerous Concerns’ Regarding 2020 Election on December 11.

Vinness Ollervides has an amazing life story and background. He studied in the West, speaks six languages, and is a writer and artist. his father died in prison for his role in Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption campaign. Ollervides is now a political activist and the third generation of CCP aristocrat. He is banned from China for his public speech about democracy of Taiwan, Tibet and Manchu. We are passing this information on to our contacts in the intelligence community.

In the video a caller is heard requesting a bulk order of ballots to ship to the United States. Here is the video with the translation. FYI- Our Mandarin speaker confirmed the translation is accurate. The order was reportedly for 5 million votes.

Reveals Video, Photos of Alleged Chinese Counterfeit Ballot Printing Operations of US Ballots for MI, FL and NC

China Whistleblower Steps Forward – Reveals Video, Photos of Alleged Chinese Counterfeit Ballot Printing Operations of US Ballots for MI, FL and NC


Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Vos: Republicans Will Convene Public Hearing on ‘Numerous Concerns’ Regarding 2020 Election on December 11

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Fascinating if true and S&F!!!

Now I will watch the left here step in and "debunk" it...

And by "debunk" I mean they will say things like...

If it isn't in court it isn't evidence!!! (BTW, my favorite excuse by far)

The Chinese are doing this to throw the election for Trump!!! (Projection)

Your source is not CNN so it can't be true!!! (Demonize the source)

There is no evidence!!! (which at this point is just sad)

Let the games begin!!!!

a reply to: Doctor Smith

The headline from your first source.

China Whistleblower with Royal Ancestry Steps Forward

Royal Ancestry?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Doctor Smith

The headline from your first source.

China Whistleblower with Royal Ancestry Steps Forward

Royal Ancestry?

Demonize the source!!!

You were right on time!

Thank you!!!

Wow. Just when you think you've heard it all.. wonder if these are the ones that reportedly came in on the plane in the middle of the night somewhere?
Thank the gods for the whistleblowers out there!

a reply to: Lumenari
You forgot one:
It's not enough to overturn the election.

Maybe we will start hearing new excuses..
"Those were for a movie!' or some sh#t xD

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: Lumenari
You forgot one:
It's not enough to overturn the election.

I really love that one.

They go from...

"Every Vote Matters!!!!"

straight to...

"Those Votes Don't Matter if we still win!!!"

Due to all the one way fraud orchestrated against Trump. I call the election and ordain Trump as President of the United States of America. For at least the next four years.

And I have just as much authority to declare the winner of the election as MSM.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

And I have just as much authority to declare the winner of the election as MSM.

Right. It's the states. And they have done so. Or are you now going to rely on faithless electors?

a reply to: Doctor Smith

And this is precisely why this is a national security threat issue.

Add to that this little gem...

Through UBS China buys into Dominion, Oct 2020

Text“On Oct 8, 2020, Staple Street Capital filed SEC Form D offerings and sales amount of $400,000,000 with the Sales Compensation Recipient identified as UBS Securities,” states the investigation, which also notes that another payment of $200,000,000 was received in December 2014.

Whenever someone links that website, I get this:

Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner Your access to this service has been limited. (HTTP response code 503) If you think you have been blocked in error, contact the owner of this site for assistance.

Block Reason: Access from your area has been temporarily limited for security reasons.

Here you go:



This is the video in the link.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Doctor Smith

And I have just as much authority to declare the winner of the election as MSM.

Right. It's the states. And they have done so. Or are you now going to rely on faithless electors?

Not at all.

What is going to be relied on is the State Legislator's choice of electors.

Which doesn't have to be chosen because of the popular vote... at all.

“Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors…” (Article II, Section 1). State legislatures can even choose to forego a popular election altogether and directly appoint their electors, as many states did in the early years of our republic.

The Founders were wise indeed.

Also, the "full" story on this video:

The wheels of justice churn slowly, but at some point the dam will break and one of these whistleblower cases will gain traction and another until you lefties will say its too late to stop it. We cant reverse the election just because of fraud will be the next talking point. In fact, it will shift to be one of Bidens primary promises for the first year to focus on securing the election and condemning Trump for allowing the disorganization of the elections to cause this.

a reply to: Lumenari

Which doesn't have to be chosen because of the popular vote... at all.

There ya go. No need for a presidential election by the people.
I've argued that very point very many times. It's nowhere in the Constitution.

a reply to: havok

The full 11 min. video, (the one havok just posted above is a one minute excerpt)

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Lumenari

Which doesn't have to be chosen because of the popular vote... at all.

There ya go. No need for a presidential election by the people.
I've argued that very point very many times. It's nowhere in the Constitution.

“Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors…” (Article II, Section 1). State legislatures can even choose to forego a popular election altogether and directly appoint their electors, as many states did in the early years of our republic.

You are welcome.

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: Lumenari
You forgot one:
It's not enough to overturn the election.

Yeah that one is the most hilarious and most outrageous.
“Yeah there was fraud......BUT not enough to make a difference”
Insane