Drs say stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition

a reply to: DeusInAbsentia

So why is the UK allowing disparaging marks about the virus and lockdowns? But in the curious case of this vaccine it’s gonna be a crime? Why that?

Professor Sir John Bell speaks about the covid vaccines , saying something about Sterilization...

“These vaccines are unlikely to “completely sterilize” a population. Professor Sir John Bell, SAGE!





No big deal ? Just some sterilization

Well, that means all of us women who don't want anymore kids can just take the vaccine and poof, no more kids.

Sounds like a win, win to me for women who don't want to get pregnant.

Anywho, I'll be getting it and so will my 86 year old mother.

I'll let all the normies take it.

If you're so prolife I wish you to reincarnate in some Indian slums on your next journey

a reply to: Mandroid7

I lot of politicians and even the potus are pushing for a rushed vaccine.

Good enough reason for me to be skeptical.

a reply to: Phage

Phage, all you do is ruin threads. I know you see yourself as the grand voice of reason but a quick correction, if you feel the need, suffices otherwise you destroy the flow of conversation by your one liners. Nobody wants to read further if it turns into bickering between two people and any accurate information flies by like a ball on a tennis court. Hard to absorb and think about. And it can be unfair to the original poster.

A lot of conspiracy theory is about cross referencing different sources that we know are not all "accurate" but are used instead as a window into the motives behind the scenes for further research. I agree with pointing out your truth but then drop it, please. I usually leave threads you join into because they get fractured into too many parts to follow.

a reply to: scraedtosleep
CNN and FAUCI are miffed over why only 61% of the U.S. population wants a Covid-19 shot, when its available.

Maybe if they'd look out their windows, or called their relatives sometimes, they'd know the answer.

No bodies in the street, no ambulances running around, very few "missing loved ones" at Thanksgiving dinner table, due to mild Corona-19.

Every "dire warning" from the EXPERTS and MEDIA has been proven wrong. (Except for the poor economy, layoffs, suicides, etc.. caused by Democrat Governors.)

originally posted by: FauxMulder


I don't think a lot of people in general know just how popular eugenics was back in the day. It was all the rage.

I think you're right about that mate and looks like certain well monied families who have deep connections to the WHO, FDA, AMA and the CDC may still be into it.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: Lysergic

Come on. It’s a vaccine against manmade global warming too.

originally posted by: Homefree
So...you're telling me I can take it a shot I can take a shot that stops all them wermens getting pregnated?

Are these "Wermens" Liverbirds by any chance?..or are we heading in the direction of Hairy Werewomen aka lassies from deepest darkest Solihull.

2020 is the maddest of years.

a reply to: Phage

I read the vaccine distribution protocols for my state yesterday. Since we have to be all PC now, I'm way, way down the list of candidates, so there will be plenty of guinea pigs getting it before I can even think about it.



But I did find it curious that the "underserved", read minority, communities are higher up on the list than those with pre-existing conditions. They're right under health care workers and people in LTC care homes and before everyone else.

Of course, then the next question is if the vehicle for sterilization is to disrupt placental formation, do I have to worry about my son getting it or not? I'm just trying to wonder about how hard I have to fight over him.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Phage

I read the vaccine distribution protocols for my state yesterday. Since we have to be all PC now, I'm way, way down the list of candidates, so there will be plenty of guinea pigs getting it before I can even think about it.

But I did find it curious that the "underserved", read minority, communities are higher up on the list than those with pre-existing conditions. They're right under health care workers and people in LTC care homes and before everyone else.

Wow. Really?! Thank you for verification of this. I’m sure it’s all in the up and up

a reply to: carewemust

So, what level of deaths and hospitalisations are you up to over there?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: slatesteam

The Eugenicists of yore are toasting each in other in hell

Did you know that Nikola Tesla was a eugenicist (I don't think capitalization is appropriate)?

What group do you suppose is the target?

“Minorities” and “at risk” groups beyond medical professionals and the elderly.

There has been substantial talk about COVID disproportionately impacting the African American population. Plus, if you have the vaccine to white people first, then you’d be racist.

So, you vaccinate the elderly/nursing home bucket first as they truly are the most at risk from any disease and they’re beyond the reproductive years. Side effects kill some nominal % of that population but it’s minor.

You also vaccinate medical professionals because you need a validator - and what better validator than pictures of doctors and nurses getting the shot in the arm.

Then you go to the minorities and sell it as putting them first. They get the vaccine and in 3-6 months the sterility impacts will become noticeable.

I have had my suspicions that this is why there are two vaccines coming out. If one goes to largely minority populations and the other doesn’t, I’d say that’s at least a curious point that there is far more intent here than has been officially stated.

So we need to watch who gets what vaccine and when. That’s the tell, in my mind.

Now to the point of Eugenics, I think some here have some misconceptions.

Gates nor anyone else is trying to commit genocide by the billions as it pertains to eliminating already living humans. They might want to, but that’s hard to pull off. What they’re saying is that going forward, population needs to decline. Depending on the source, decline by ~1.2-1.8bn humans.

The reasons for this are numerous but also not all nefarious. We can only handle about 10bn humans on earth and even then it wouldn’t be the current standard of living for all - particularly from a food standpoint.

So, if you can sterilize a huge portion of the global population you’ll see numbers decline into the coming decades. The resource drain will decrease and the “wealth” that exists today won’t evaporate - it’ll be consolidated giving, on balance, all remaining humans a relatively higher standard of living. In the process, more to the point of this thread, certain groups labeled as “undesirable” will be “inoculated” against reproduction per TPTB. Thus making the human race at large more “pure” - not so much on the basis of race - but globally getting rid of non-productive humans. Non-productive humans are, in all reality, the largest parasitic threat Earth faces.

I say the above to help set some of this record on Eugenics a little more logically. You have to take lots of aspects of a population decrease into perspective. If you do that, you’ll see that fewer humans, at some point, will have to happen. Has to. Otherwise we face a threat to the existence of humanity broadly in the intermediate term - it’s not many generations away.

For instance, there’s 120 million more humans in America today then when I was born (approximately). Wonder why the lines are long at Disneyland, we need big box retailers with deep supply chains, traffic and pollution is worse more-less everywhere? 120mm more people... take that away and lots and lots of other problems fade off.

So, yeah - I say that it’s probable this vaccine has a much different purpose. I’m also not advocating for this vaccine to have said negative reproductive impact. But, the logic above is probably what’s driving the desire (at least for Gates) and in reality it actually does make sense.

I’ll wait to see who gets what vaccine and in what order and then reassess, personally.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Phage

I read the vaccine distribution protocols for my state yesterday. Since we have to be all PC now, I'm way, way down the list of candidates, so there will be plenty of guinea pigs getting it before I can even think about it.

But I did find it curious that the "underserved", read minority, communities are higher up on the list than those with pre-existing conditions. They're right under health care workers and people in LTC care homes and before everyone else.

Of course, then the next question is if the vehicle for sterilization is to disrupt placental formation, do I have to worry about my son getting it or not? I'm just trying to wonder about how hard I have to fight over him.

There you go.

What’ll be really interesting is when we “use up the first batches” and have to switch to either the other manufacturer or the “next batch” of vaccine from the original manufacturer. Both of which could be different and we’d never know.

This has been the plan. What makes me laugh a bit is I think Obama is a puppet and getting played. He’s popped up a lot more recently... yet his party is enacting this plan. Using some one like Obama to push COVID and other narratives helps the cause here. All he’s really doing is contributing to the decline of “his people”, as he puts it.

a reply to: EnigmaChaser

You forget that the elderly will be getting it right up there with people in the medical community. That's another validating population, but if they're sterilized by it ... so what? Nature has already done that work for us.

And since so many of our health care workers are productive and among our better citizens, they may very well be receiving something other than the culprit too.

I will say that husband makes vaccines as his career, and he's in no rush to run out and get it.

**EDIT**

I should add that this is his typical response to most vaccines that are new where he judges the potential cure to be possibly more trouble than the actual disease.

originally posted by: Homefree
So...you're telling me I can take it a shot I can take a shot that stops all them wermens getting pregnated?

Hell, I might consider taking it now!

No kiddos for this dude. That’s for daaaaaaamn sure.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Mandroid7

I lot of politicians and even the potus are pushing for a rushed vaccine.

Good enough reason for me to be skeptical.

I strongly doubt Trump is in on this.

Not because he’s a “good guy” but because he’s not truly part of TPTB. Not of their ilk.

Trump genuinely wants to restore the economy - that has been the cornerstone of his time in office and doesn’t want to see it destroyed. It makes logical sense relative to most of his rhetoric through his time in office.

Pretty sure this is perpetrated by the left. What would help ailing blue state economies/state budgets more than removing subsets of the populations that are on balance more dependent on the stage - I.e. elderly and minorities...

Also fits the left’s climate narrative, wanting people to eat less meat, etc.