General McInerney Calls For Martial Law

Unless all the Republican Judges are in on it as well they have not seen any evidence of Massive cheating as of yet and have done there job DISMISSED .

originally posted by: ManSizedSquirrel
And this is the general that knows all about the raid in Germany?

That's him.

I've seen short bus window-lickers less wacky than this guy.

a reply to: kwakakev
The general is partially right. IF, as he says...

- The government is tracking the conversions of ballots to votes. “That’s where the manipulation is coming in. We’re tracking that. We have that information.”

Then why weren't Federal Marshall's sent in immediately, people arrested, and the evidence seized. We wouldn't be having this conversation if someone had not dropped the ball from the start. Martial Law is unnecessary. Federal law enforcement and politicians doing their effing job is what's necessary.

originally posted by: tinktinktink
Look to the forums as a mini version of the US. Most believe the election was fixed. Those who dont have displayed irrational hatred for the man and allowed that to cloud their goggles. A year ago Trump could have saved a truckload of sex workers from being trafficked and they would complain Trump ruined their livelihoods. The claims of foreign interference gains credibility because over half the folks described above aren't even Americans.

Orrr.. this board is a microbubble full of trumpsters who will never accept the voting.

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: kwakakev
The general is partially right. IF, as he says...

- The government is tracking the conversions of ballots to votes. “That’s where the manipulation is coming in. We’re tracking that. We have that information.”

Then why weren't Federal Marshall's sent in immediately, people arrested, and the evidence seized. We wouldn't be having this conversation if someone had not dropped the ball from the start. Martial Law is unnecessary. Federal law enforcement and politicians doing their effing job is what's necessary.

and that begs the question, if "we have the information", why isn't that what is used to prove this was wrong?

I keep seeing Papodopolis claiming on Twitter, "we have it all!" I have to laugh and ask, "why won't you show it to the folks that matter?"

If there is something there as we all suspect, show it, prove it. Otherwise, accept the swamp is bigger than you and move on.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: kwakakev
The general is partially right. IF, as he says...

- The government is tracking the conversions of ballots to votes. “That’s where the manipulation is coming in. We’re tracking that. We have that information.”

Then why weren't Federal Marshall's sent in immediately, people arrested, and the evidence seized. We wouldn't be having this conversation if someone had not dropped the ball from the start. Martial Law is unnecessary. Federal law enforcement and politicians doing their effing job is what's necessary.

and that begs the question, if "we have the information", why isn't that what is used to prove this was wrong?

It's all about those donations man. They are not interested in fighting this. Its a ploy for $$$$$ now.

Trump Raises $170 Million

A donor has to give $5,000 to Mr. Trump’s new PAC before any funds go to his recount account.

In reality, the fine print shows that the first 75 percent of every contribution currently goes to a new political action committee that Mr. Trump set up in mid-November, Save America, which can be used to fund his political activities going forward, including staff and travel. The other 25 percent of each donation is directed to the Republican National Committee.

NYT
DNYUZ
Actual Trump donation website with fine print

originally posted by: ManFromEurope

originally posted by: tinktinktink
Look to the forums as a mini version of the US. Most believe the election was fixed. Those who dont have displayed irrational hatred for the man and allowed that to cloud their goggles. A year ago Trump could have saved a truckload of sex workers from being trafficked and they would complain Trump ruined their livelihoods. The claims of foreign interference gains credibility because over half the folks described above aren't even Americans.

Orrr.. this board is a microbubble full of trumpsters who will never accept the voting.

Being as you aren't from around here, you don't know, nor does you opinion matter at all. Not even a little.

But should you choose to expand that tiny mind, look back to what we know for fact that transpired during Trump's beginning. Set aside your feeling for him as a person, and just look at what was done to the presidency by they outgoing administration. it was wrong, and dirty. it should never have happened, and should never happen again to anyone else.

it was real, still is. And when you know all that, and you see what happened live and in person during the election, you can't help but feel cheated.

The left got what they wanted. But that doesn't change any of the facts we know to be true.

there are about 70 million folks that feel this way.

It was fixed this is an overt overthrow. Are you willing to stand up and fight like you are asking others to do for you because that is what it will take to win.

a reply to: ManFromEurope

Thats why your here nobly defending your pedo pres with crafty one-liners lol. Look around buddy your that one guy in the room with his fingers in your ears and the thick goggles obstructing reality.

a reply to: iwanttobelieve70

Are you standing by to stand by?

a reply to: FauxMulder

Trump doesn't need the money. So who does?

originally posted by: tinktinktink
Thats why your here nobly defending your pedo pres with crafty one-liners lol.

LOL:

ManFromEurope

It isn't his President.

a reply to: network dude

Well, it's his PAC so I'd say he plans to use it in the future or to pay down campaign debt. He's not an idiot. He's not going to use his own money when millions of people will donate.

aaaand somebody tell the retired 3-star general to go back to being retired. LOL, we should all agree that option isn't the best idea. This is something the courts and legislature are handling just fine. No need to burn down the barn cause there is a rat in it.

a reply to: kwakakev

Well, it's not all doom and gloom.

He didn't weigh in on cancelling Christmas.

So there's that...

a reply to: network dude

and that begs the question, if "we have the information", why isn't that what is used to prove this was wrong?

It's a good question, and I don't know all the answers. What I do know is that no matter what Trump does it's going to be wrong and he will be the treasonous one. The media alone will shout it from the rooftops. People right here on ATS have already begun accusing Trump of being the one trying to coup. Page one of this thread is a good example.

I keep seeing Papodopolis claiming on Twitter, "we have it all!" I have to laugh and ask, "why won't you show it to the folks that matter?"

It seems many of the folks that matter don't give a s**t.

If there is something there as we all suspect, show it, prove it. Otherwise, accept the swamp is bigger than you and move on.

I think Trump's team has shown more than enough evidence to warrant a massive investigation, but it's unlikely to happen, so they have turned to state legislatures to take it upon themselves to do the right thing. Arizona and PA seem to be convinced and willing, but they are committees, not the whole of the legislature. One fearful judge was convinced enough to impound Georgia's machines for all the good it will do at this point.

And your last sentence may be the crux of the matter. The swamp didn't come to exist overnight. It was created over a long period of time and its tentacles are long. It shall not be drained so easily.

Martial law? No. Hell no!!! I understand that to a hammer, everything's a nail -- side-eyeing the general here -- but this is ridiculous. And dangerous for the general to even suggest, quite frankly.

We are a nation of laws. Let Team Trump make his case, within the laws of the land. If we have bad laws, then expose them and demand better. If we have bad machines, then expose them and demand better. If we have bad people, expose them and hold them accountable.

If we cannot win the war without martial law, then we will never win the peace.

So when does a long retired General declare martial law with any authority?

It’s like the people that say there is no possible way that there is fraud, when they have zero to do with the voting process (including voting in the first place), with absolute authority.

Hell yeah there are fraudulent votes. There are every election. We can go through past examples. Was there an attempt to have enough fraudulent votes to change the results? Very possible. Listen to what they have been saying and doing the past three years including a completely partisan impeachment attempt. Or just the calls to disrupt people while eating.

Considering that cumulative evidence, anyone that has the mental capacity to go all day without wetting themselves should be able to say that fraud was possible. And with any sense of morality toward fair play, would say what would it hurt to look?

Or is that the problem? The overwhelming fear that it would be found, that Joe gets the heave ho and once again you have egg on your face for believing in these crooks?

originally posted by: Boadicea
Martial law? No. Hell no!!! I understand that to a hammer, everything's a nail -- side-eyeing the general here -- but this is ridiculous. And dangerous for the general to even suggest, quite frankly.

Exactly.

If Trump called on the militia ... I would not show up.

When you suspect action by Bad Actors, why do you not take measures to deal with them preemptively?

a reply to: Klassified

There is enough evidence to jail many at the top, and that was long before the election. But the DOJ is really the DOP.

You can't win the game if the whole team takes a knee. Even if you really want to win.

I think this is all just to vast and scummy for Trump to put on a cape and make it all better. And there is very little I'd like more than to be completely and totally wrong.