Would Biden consider conceding in exchange for a pardon?

I've got to say, this is not that far out of the realm of plausibility given what we 'know' about the Biden family. I don't believe for a moment he would do it for himself, but for his family and specifically, his son? Didn't Gen Flynn do roughly the same thing initially based on threats to his son?

Biden is still cognitive enough to know he doesn't have many years left.........So to ensure his family is protected, I'd do it.....Of course, I don't think I would have gotten into that situation to begin with, but...............Again, just another unconfirmed report.......So I guess we shall wait and see.

Biden in talks with Trump for Pardon

By some accounts, Joe Biden is preparing to concede the election and is reaching out to Trump to negotiate a pardon for all the crimes committed by himself and his family members. This claim, attributed to a "very reliable source," was broadcast by Lude Media (Gnews.org), the same group that first spilled the truth about Hunter Biden's laptop and all the outrageous content it contained. Such a deal would, of course, protect the Bidens but essentially serve as a selling out of Obama, Brennan and other deep state players who don't want to be prosecuted for treason and are very capable of, say, breaking someone's ankles to get them to comply. The official story on Biden's recent injury is that Joe Biden fractured his ankle "walking his dog," but no one believes that except for the clueless. This claim about Biden seeking a concession deal, which is not yet confirmed from other sources, is covered in today's Situation Update podcast that I've posted below. Here's the video from GTV (Guo / Lude Media) where this unconfirmed claim is being made: Brighteon.com/e654bf49-703c-4bfb-a654-9a5bf15cba30

a reply to: pointr97

Biden can probably only have conversations with clouds and invisible llama's that follow him.

No. if Biden is in talks with anyone over that sort of thing, it's with the only coattails that matter -- Comma-LA. He gets her installed, steps down, she steps up, pardons him.

Wow. Keep burying your head in the sand.

Let me guess that you think Trump's casinos failed because of an Oceans 11 type of heist.

It is over. Trump lost because he is the most divesive president of our lifetime. His COVID response was the worst in the developed world. He lost because more people voted for Biden.

The real conspiracy is the why fringe sites like this keep believing a lie.

originally posted by: ketsuko
No. if Biden is in talks with anyone over that sort of thing, it's with the only coattails that matter -- Comma-LA. He gets her installed, steps down, she steps up, pardons him.

Kerkermer would lose out on a second term if she steps in too quickly.

a reply to: ketsuko

....except her name is Hunter’s emails of “business” dealings. So impeachment would be a two-fer. Another reason for Nancy to not be Speaker in January.

originally posted by: pointr97
I've got to say, this is not that far out of the realm of plausibility given what we 'know' about the Biden family. I don't believe for a moment he would do it for himself, but for his family and specifically, his son? Didn't Gen Flynn do roughly the same thing initially based on threats to his son?

Biden is still cognitive enough to know he doesn't have many years left.........So to ensure his family is protected, I'd do it.....Of course, I don't think I would have gotten into that situation to begin with, but...............Again, just another unconfirmed report.......So I guess we shall wait and see.

Biden in talks with Trump for Pardon

By some accounts, Joe Biden is preparing to concede the election and is reaching out to Trump to negotiate a pardon for all the crimes committed by himself and his family members. This claim, attributed to a "very reliable source," was broadcast by Lude Media (Gnews.org), the same group that first spilled the truth about Hunter Biden's laptop and all the outrageous content it contained. Such a deal would, of course, protect the Bidens but essentially serve as a selling out of Obama, Brennan and other deep state players who don't want to be prosecuted for treason and are very capable of, say, breaking someone's ankles to get them to comply. The official story on Biden's recent injury is that Joe Biden fractured his ankle "walking his dog," but no one believes that except for the clueless. This claim about Biden seeking a concession deal, which is not yet confirmed from other sources, is covered in today's Situation Update podcast that I've posted below. Here's the video from GTV (Guo / Lude Media) where this unconfirmed claim is being made: Brighteon.com/e654bf49-703c-4bfb-a654-9a5bf15cba30

So you do know Biden is under secret service protection. We are supposed to believe that the "deep state" sent someone who the SS men would let Biden be alone with, and they broke his ankle. Unless he met with Obama and Barry did it himself. Which is more believable than a ninja ankle breaker. But not too much as his doctor says it's just a hairline fracture. Come on, sounds like something to just convolute the potential real issues as much as anything. I even watched the video on natural news FWIW it's Chinese based and has zero credibility.

originally posted by: jrod
Wow. Keep burying your head in the sand.

Let me guess that you think Trump's casinos failed because of an Oceans 11 type of heist.

It is over. Trump lost because he is the most divesive president of our lifetime. His COVID response was the worst in the developed world. He lost because more people voted for Biden.

The real conspiracy is the why fringe sites like this keep believing a lie.

Lol, just spouting off a bunch of nonsense.... And then you bash this site, as you use it.. haha

a reply to: jrod

Trolls be trollin

a reply to: pointr97

What makes you think any politician is scared of criminal proceedings (with the actual intention of conviction)?

No high ranking politician has been pursued legally for a long time. There seems to be a reason for that.

Surely there's been a decades long tradition of overall f***ery and blatant lawlessness. But rarely a pointing to any of it other than for political pandering, typically around campaign cycles.

And if the left truly thinks Trump committed crimes, they're going to go after him after he's out of office right?

Wrong.

(aside from possible tax discrepancies, I don't think he's done anything warranting legal action).

But the second someone goes after a senator, congressman or president, the precedent is set. It's open season on those in public office who skirt the line. And none of them want that.

We won't see it, no matter how blatant the crimes. Mark my words.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Possibly.....Never know, again, this isn't my theory. I asked a simple question, 'would he consider it if he knew his son wasn't as Teflon as he is?'

a reply to: putnam6
I am still going with the theory he sniffed a sassy girl and she foot stomped him for it

a reply to: pointr97

I am very open to new ideas. There is no evidence that Trump won the election. Precisely zip, the courts agree. If actual evidence was presented, then I would entertain the idea.

If you.think I am trolling then you have no idea what a troll is.

originally posted by: TKDRL
a reply to: putnam6
I am still going with the theory he sniffed a sassy girl and she foot stomped him for it

Biden is like 114 years old and mentally weak.

The poor dears tend to fall a lot.

Snort, discrediting something outright, is literally the definition of trolling. Come in to pick a fight, without cause. Not even open to a discussion.......Just want reactions, ie, Troll

But you do you, and feel good about yourself for it. Cheers buddy.

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: pointr97

I am very open to new ideas. There is no evidence that Trump won the election. Precisely zip, the courts agree. If actual evidence was presented, then I would entertain the idea.

If you.think I am trolling then you have no idea what a troll is.

a reply to: jhn7537

The motto here used to be "Deny ignorance"

Lets not be ignorant. Trump will be out of office in less than two months. Anyone who still believes Trump will some how subvert the election results and still remain president is embracing ignorance instead of denying it.

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: jhn7537

The motto here used to be "Deny ignorance"

Lets not be ignorant. Trump will be out of office in less than two months. Anyone who still believes Trump will some how subvert the election results and still remain president is embracing ignorance instead of denying it.

You are right.

Trump will be gone and Old Joe Trippy-Pants will be in until Kerkerma tosses him down a flight of stairs.

Yay your party!

a reply to: pointr97

Even if Trump pulls the election, Biden won't be pursued.

Source: lock her up. Dude was repeating it over and over, and pretty much dropped the topic after winning.

He has publicly accused numerous of politicians of breaking laws flagrantly, how many went to court?

I understand he does not have the authority to direct the justice system, but it looked to me as if he watched them sit on their hands, and seemingly sat on his own.

a reply to: jrod

Do you really think that using mirror arguments will work here?

Here, let me fix that for you ...

Lets not be ignorant. Biden will be in jail in less than two months. Anyone who still believes Biden will some how subvert the election results and become the president is embracing ignorance instead of denying it.

See, easy and mine is truthful.

P