It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ameilia
a reply to: Willtell
I would wager to guess whoever put it there, a person or group, has come to recover it now that is has received so much attention. Perhaps it was a meeting spot for a group, or had particular meaning to a person. By exposing it, it's been ruined.
originally posted by: Willtell
originally posted by: Ameilia
a reply to: Willtell
I would wager to guess whoever put it there, a person or group, has come to recover it now that is has received so much attention. Perhaps it was a meeting spot for a group, or had particular meaning to a person. By exposing it, it's been ruined.
That's good Amelia, very good. I think that is a great possibility of being the truth
The Utah monolith was a metallic pillar made by an unknown person(s) that stood in a red sandstone slot canyon in southeastern Utah. The 10-foot (3 m) tall structure was made of stainless steel or aluminium sheets riveted together into the shape of a triangular prism, with a hollow interior. It was unlawfully placed on public land between August 2015 and October 2016. In November 2020, state biologists discovered the pillar. Public officials withheld its location to prevent people from becoming lost trying to find it, but within hours of their announcement, some people found it on Google Earth and began visiting the site. Following worldwide media coverage of the monolith's discovery, it was removed by an unknown party days later.
Within 48 hours of the DPS announcement, members of the public had reached the site and uploaded photographs and videos of the monolith to social media.[10] Local business owners feared a surge in traffic could damage local Native American sites and artifacts.[11] Within a few days, the top two rivets on one side had been removed in an attempt to look inside.[12]
Disappearance
The Utah division of the Bureau of Land Management said that it received credible reports that the monolith was removed on the evening of November 27, 2020 by an unknown party.[24] All that was left was a triangular metal piece that used to be on top. Two people who hiked to the location near midnight, Riccardo Marino and Sierra Van Meter, saw a pickup truck driving away from the site while they approached it: "We were driving in and we saw a truck with the tailgate folded back and a large object in the back." On arrival, they saw that the monolith was gone.[25][26][27] Someone had scrawled "Bye B****!" in the sand; it appeared that someone had urinated on the ground, and tire tracks were visible.[28]
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Kurokage
Good call.
Shows that people are just the worst.
By all accounts it’s been sitting there unnoticed since 2016 and within a week of being discovered, it’s been stolen.
originally posted by: DAVID64
originally posted by: Willtell
This is a national disgrace. We need an investigation; Trump or Biden should put the DOJ on this. Contact area 51 pronto...
Heads must roll and disappear as fast as that obelisk
They should have put security guards out there
In the bitter cold in the dark night…
no excuse for this... Utah should be sanctioned.
Next time ship it to jersey... at least we'd have gotten some money for it
Don't forget the sharks with laser guided missiles.
....I know it's a desert but these are really cool sharks.
originally posted by: Cauliflower
a reply to: neutronflux
Artwork that got a couple days in the limelight.
Utah has lots of artists, this piece reminds me of the old "implied geometry" works which had some neat time lapse photography.
Officials said that the structure was most likely a work of art and that its installation on public land was illegal. It was unclear who had put it there — and when — but the art world quickly speculated that it was the work of John McCracken, a sculptor fond of science fiction. He died in 2011.
His son, Patrick McCracken, told The New York Times this week that his father had told him in 2002 that “he would like to leave his artwork in remote places to be discovered later.”