Judge: Republicans Will Likely Win Pennsylvania Election Lawsuit

The same judge who ordered a halt to the certification of PA's vote has now ruled a second time to stop certification and that the state election was unconstitutional...

A group of Republican lawmakers and candidates sued the Keystone State earlier this week, arguing that the state legislature’s mail-in voting law—Act 77—violated the commonwealth’s constitution.

“Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment,” McCullough wrote.

The story I'm getting from other sources is that the governor then went on record stating that he had already certified said results, prompting a response from the judge to halt any further attempts to certify.

Pennsylvania said that it had certified the results of the election for president and vice president on Nov. 24 while the court was reviewing briefings from both parties. In response, the plaintiffs filed a request for an emergency injunction, arguing that that state need not have acted so fast.

The judge agreed.
Link

This was not a Trump team suit. More and more it seems, there are other interested parties filing their own suits and winning. This is very helpful in propelling their own as well as the Trump team suits to the SCOTUS. We'll see where it goes from here.
Also see Carewemust's related thead here.

a reply to: Klassified

If you listen only to the MSM, You wouldn't know that Pennsylvania has not yet certified Joe Biden as the winner.

a reply to: Klassified

It is only a matter of time, with appropriate application of the Constitution, the myriad of election fraud schemes will be rejected and we will see the true voice of the people...

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Klassified

If you listen only to the MSM, You wouldn't know that Pennsylvania has not yet certified Joe Biden as the winner.

Correct, but the MSM is working over-time convincing their viewers that alternative sources are all lies and they shouldn't be watching them. Check out this short video. They go overboard to make people think only toothless hicks listen to conservative news sources.

Newsmax and OANN are telling lies about the election as more people tune in

It's like grassroots legal actions are taking place.

True Americans who have the time, knowledge and resources are filing in court the fraud they saw firsthand.

On the night of Nov. 3d and in the wee hours of the 4th, anyone watching saw the cheating take place.

a reply to: elementalgrove
Very possible at this point. The independent lawsuits along with Trump's team are gradually turning the tide. There's still a long way to go though.

a reply to: Klassified

further attempts to certify.

So not the potus race but the senate and house and local government races?

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Klassified

further attempts to certify.

So not the potus race but the senate and house and local government races?

Both, if I understand correctly. The judge has ordered a full halt. Twice now.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Klassified

further attempts to certify.

So not the potus race but the senate and house and local government races?

You could try reading... it specifies President and Vice President in the OP...

/facepalm

Another failure. Sounds like the judge ruled according to law but has different feelings so wrote this opinion piece you mention.

U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly's lawsuit to halt the certification of votes in Pennsylvania has been supported by a state appeals court judge.

Judge Patricia McCullough, a Republican, on Wednesday ordered counties to halt the certification process regarding votes in the 2020 presidential race. She said the halt of certifying votes is pending an evidentiary hearing at 11:30 a.m. Friday. Kelly, R-16th, filed the lawsuit Saturday almost simultaneously with a federal judge's dismissal of a case filed by the Trump campaign and two lawyers to stop the certification of Pennsylvania's ballots.

Federal Judge Matthew Brann, a Republican, called the Trump lawsuit “strained legal arguments without merit” and accusations that were not backed by any evidence. Kelly's lawsuit challenges about 2.5 million mail-in ballots that were cast predominantly by Democrats. The suit claims the GOP-controlled state Legislature had failed to follow proper procedure when it voted last year to expand mail-in voting.

The state Supreme Court has twice this month overturned Commonwealth Court decisions involving Republican election challenges.

Link

a reply to: Gnawledge

The state Supreme Court has twice this month overturned Commonwealth Court decisions involving Republican election challenges.

Now the Supreme Court will get to hear it.

This is not really a failure, as some keep trying to say.

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
a reply to: Gnawledge

The state Supreme Court has twice this month overturned Commonwealth Court decisions involving Republican election challenges.

Now the Supreme Court will get to hear it.

This is not really a failure, as some keep trying to say.

If they choose to see it, yes. But with the opinion of the state court being so dismissive, I'd say it's unlikely.

a reply to: Gnawledge
Two different lawsuits by two different parties on different grounds, but this particular suit is likely headed for the supreme court anyway, which is where Judge McCullough says they will likely win because of state constitutional infractions. So not a failure yet.

originally posted by: Gnawledge

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
a reply to: Gnawledge

The state Supreme Court has twice this month overturned Commonwealth Court decisions involving Republican election challenges.

Now the Supreme Court will get to hear it.

This is not really a failure, as some keep trying to say.

If they choose to see it, yes. But with the opinion of the state court being so dismissive, I'd say it's unlikely.

Court/judge opinions in PA have been varied, which make it more likely the supreme court will be called upon to sort it out.

originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: Gnawledge
Two different lawsuits by two different parties on different grounds, but this particular suit is likely headed for the supreme court anyway, which is where Judge McCullough says they will likely win because of state constitutional infractions. So not a failure yet.

Where is it said it is headed to the supreme court? That has all been hopes and dreams. The Supreme Court hasn't agreed to hear any of these cases yet. Not that I've heard of anyway.

"Likely headed" is not..."headed"...

Hopefully after the SC sorts out this election mess, they start doing their jobs. They stop ducking cases, and start slapping down all the unconstitutional BS that have been propped up the last century or so.

a reply to: Klassified

I read that since the potus race is fully certified only the races that have not been certified apply.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Klassified

I read that since the potus race is fully certified only the races that have not been certified apply.

Even if that was/is true, the legislature in PA is taking steps to choose the electors themselves. See the link to carewemust's thread for details. Also, the article link addresses this if you read it, though I do not count on any article to be 100% factual.

a reply to: Gnawledge

Even the Judge knows it will more than likely move up to the Supreme Court.

That could be the reason for the "opinion piece".

a reply to: Klassified


Omg that's amazing.......
That still won't make him the diaper and chief.
He only hope is in the courts or the electoral collage.
And both would be a first in American history. If memory serves me correct.