It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I'm not sure if I should be Proud or Disappointed...

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 28 2020 @ 12:56 AM
link   
So there was an article about Jane Seymour, who, at 69 years old, allegedly said that she could play a 25 year old. She denies that she said it, but I wanted to look. I've had a bit of a crush since she was on Battlestar Galactica in the 70's.

So I did a Google search for:

Jane Seymour, 69

And looked under Images and was completely shocked that I didn't see a bit of Porn.

What little I know of Boolean processing, I don't know how that's possible with only 3 pieces of Search criteria. But when I did a Search for "69" all on its own. Google came up with some ulgy-@ss Rapper. So I'm sure it's throwing off Google's Search capabilities.

Anyone else surprised by Google's Search capabilities lately?



posted on Nov, 28 2020 @ 04:08 AM
link   
a reply to: CryHavoc

Must be a country thing because if I search "69" I get a whole lot of results with suggestion of how to spice up your bedroom...

No surprise...I'm on a Dutch backbone.

Peace



posted on Nov, 28 2020 @ 04:36 AM
link   
a reply to: CryHavoc

If you're having problems with Google use Brave browser

www.express.co.uk...




Jane Seymour, 69, insists she can pass for 25 after losing part of role to younger actress



posted on Nov, 28 2020 @ 02:24 PM
link   
a reply to: CryHavoc

Google has zero issues with their own search.

They rank theirs 1st.

PS parental blockers these days? Any kid can enter any # of clean words/slang...and porn comes up.

*CHECK YOUR OWN



posted on Dec, 1 2020 @ 08:35 PM
link   
Rule
34




top topics
 
5

log in

join