For those of you looking for clear evidence of fraud, here are a few resources

a reply to: circuitsports

Let's review your sources:

1. heritage.org -- Over the course of the last couple of decades, the Heritage Foundcation has purported to maintain a database of alleged "voter fraud" The total they have documented amounts to 1,302 TOTAL:

1,125
Criminal convictions

48
Civil penalties

95
Diversion program

17
Judicial finding

17
Official finding

2. hereisthevidence.com : a desperate attempt to gather anecdotal evidence that has been repeatedly struck down in various courts of law.

3. whitehouse.gov: please.

4. ballotpedia.org: A summary page discussing the issues surrounding "voter fraud."

As usual, zero actual evidence presented for any claims made.

Should have book marked this thread, but finally found it.

Compilation List of some of the most significant claims of 2020 election fraud

Reasons why the 2020 presidential election is deeply puzzling


Judge to conduct hearing on whether to lift protective order(voting equipment)


CIAGypsy posted this one in another thread.

20 Alleged election facts that dont pass the smell test.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Please cite what post election audits are conducted to check to verify each ballot is legal and legitimate. A separate system to determine if the tally by each voting machine is accurate.

Without extensive true third party post election audits, or extensive monitoring of vote counting, we will never know if the mathematical spasm of political machines controlling the municipal ballot counting on election night are legitimate.

And that is how data is morally handled. It is not considered valid until independently verified. Political machines in control of ballot counting is no difference than pesticide companies publishing data their products don’t cause cancer.

Statistical analysis looking back at the last 5 elections per county.

Every one of the contested states shows a larger predicted vote share for Trump than what he actually received. This is surprising, because in any set of observations, random chance might expect some predictions to favor Biden, but none do. In Georgia and Arizona, the model does not predict a narrow race, but a decisive Trump victory; the size of the anomaly is (much) larger than the reported margin of victory.

The model also performs well in battleground states that have not been contested, and thus where the election was presumably clean. Every one of these is correctly predicted, including both battleground states that voted for Trump (e.g. Ohio, Florida) and those that voted for Biden (e.g. New Hampshire)

Dr. Peter Navarro Election Report

Fake ballots, bribery, dead voters, illegal aliens, ballots counted multiple times, out of state votes

Signature matching abuses, naked ballots, lack of postmark or backdated ballots, voting machine irregularities.