Trump Requests Georgia Recount, Meaning 5 Million Votes Will Be Tabulated A 3rd Time

The president, the chair of the Georgia Republican Party and every member of the state's 2021 Republican U.S. House delegation have contributed to the attacks on Raffensperger, Gov. Brian Kemp and how elections are run in Georgia. Both of Georgia's Republican U.S. senators, Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue, called on Raffensperger to resign last week in an evidence-free letter alleging massive failures. Loeffler and Perdue are both on the ballot for Jan. 5 runoffs that will determine control of the Senate.

The recount process is expected to take several days, with officials in Atlanta's Fulton County estimating anywhere from five to nine days of eight-hour shifts, with multiple scanners to get through more than half a million votes.

The machine recount is unlikely to change the results. It is also more accurate than the hand-count audit, which confirmed Biden's victory over Trump and was within 0.10% of the original number of ballots counted.

Trump Requests Georgia Recount, Meaning 5 Million Votes Will Be Tabulated A 3rd Time

Why would Trump want a recount in GA for a third time?

This recount will be a machine recount. Not sure what that means exactly, besides the obvious.

Maybe it means they are going to check for a watermark on the ballot as well as recount them by machine.

If our Sectary or State refuses to check signatures or tells us they have been destroyed already there will be problems.

The audit that is being requested is different than the hand count. They actually check more for the validity of the vote in the kind that they want done. That excludes many types of fraud. The kind they already did does just a little fraud checking, even with that they found quite a bit of votes not registered properly. We need to verify if the elections were honest....errrr....maybe I should say the elections were not overly dishonest because there has never been a totally honest election in the last sixty years. There is even cheating in small towns being done on local elections. The thing is that this happens all over the world, with the new technology and mail in voting, there is way more chance of it happening now than ever.

a reply to: LookingAtMars

They are actually checking to see if they have signatures this time.

Go figure

a reply to: rickymouse

Not sure they are doing an audit this time. I understand it will only be a machine recount.

The Governor has asked the Secretary of State to check only a sample of signatures. He has not agreed to do that yet.

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: LookingAtMars

They are actually checking to see if they have signatures this time.

Go figure

Maybe a small sample.

"As the Secretary of State said, there is no reason to believe there are widespread errors or fraud and the Trump campaign has no evidence to back up their baseless claims," Jaclyn Rothenberg said in a statement. "With regards to signature matching, both parties were aware of the rules set forth months before the election and all signatures have already been matched."

Hopefully it is a way to get to the fake mail in ballots that were never in an envelope per many witnesses.

There are boxes of pristine mail in ballots for only creepy joe and marked only for creepy joe.

He knows they helped by shredding the evidence so only real votes are left. LOL

originally posted by: Darkstar12
He knows they helped by shredding the evidence so only real votes are left. LOL

Man, I didn't think of that!

I hope you are right.

originally posted by: Darkstar12
He knows they helped by shredding the evidence so only real votes are left. LOL

And of course you can back that up with factual proof?

What? You can’t?

Seems to be a pattern.

a reply to: Annee

We will know if this count doesn't match the last two vote count totals.

Lol, that would be grand.

ETA - If the third count shows Trump won does Biden get a recount?

Didn't Gore recount 5 times? He didn't concede until mid Dec, so relax people.

a reply to: LookingAtMars
When was the SECOND Georgia recount?

Georgia Gov Kemp wants every mailed-in ballot signature matched to a lawfully registered voter, or the ballot is discarded, per Georgia law.

www.cbsnews.com...


Since only .04% of mailed-in ballots were rejected, when the norm is over 1.3%, it's obvious that the millions of mailed-in ballots overwhelmed the system...the law regarding VERIFYING them was not followed. (This applies to most states in 2020)

Georgia law:

Absentee ballot return envelopes are printed with an oath which must be signed by the voter.

The identifying information in the oath is compared with information on file in the clerk’s office, and the signature on the oath is compared with the signature on the absentee ballot application.

Ballots that do not conform are rejected. A voter is notified of the rejection.

Source: www.ncsl.org...

a reply to: carewemust

From your link.

He called for Raffensperger to "consider addressing these concerns" and conduct a "sample of audit of signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and compare those to the signatures on applications and on file that the secretary of state's office."

Note the word consider and sample I highlighted.

When was the SECOND Georgia recount?

Thanks it was unclear, fixed it.

originally posted by: carewemust

Since only .04% of mailed-in ballots were rejected, when the norm is over 1.3%, it's obvious that the millions of mailed-in ballots overwhelmed the system...the law regarding VERIFYING them was not followed. (This applies to most states in 2020)

I think it was Ben Shapiro who said your numbers are the national average, but GA was over 6% rejected in 2016 and only .2% for 2020. This is with a much more massive mail in of many never doing it before, so people really think the human error would be less?

So this means only a couple of things could have happened.

1. Bad/incorrect votes were overlooked and counted anyways at a very high level for a crazy .2% error level.
2. Prefect votes made their way into the piles, such votes were too prefect without even folds of being in an envelope.

So yes lets check the votes correctly.

originally posted by: rickymouse
The audit that is being requested is different than the hand count.

Raffensberger is a lying pos.

When he announced the first recount, he explicitly said it would be a full audit, recount and re-canvassing.

He lied, They refused to do any signature verification whatsoever. That is the only way to catch and delete the fake/invalid/illegal ballots, of which there are tens if not hundreds of thousands.

originally posted by: carewemust
Georgia Gov Kemp wants every mailed-in ballot signature matched to a lawfully registered voter, or the ballot is discarded, per Georgia law.

Very disappointed in Kemp. He's just covering his ass now.

According to Sidney Powell, both he and the SoS took bribes for allowing the Dominion systems in, a scant 9 months before the election.

Traitors... what does the Constitution say to do to them?

So, it's possible that we will see for the third time headlines that read biden wins georgia.

The dems are going to be singing about trumps 3 losses if this recount still shows biden as the winner.

Plus it will discourage repubs in other state legislators from speaking up. They wouldn't wont to look like the losers the repubs in georgia are going to look if this doesn't find fraud.

a reply to: LookingAtMars

The governor requested that this hand recount be done after the shredding machine companies had already visited the ballot storage locations.

a reply to: Annee

For someone that consistently asks for “proof” and hates “hearsay”, well that’s all the media you listen to tells you. Just a bunch of spin, no proof, and mostly all anecdotal nonsense..

However simple observations of this entire election are HUGE red flags, that everyone claiming “where’s the evidence”, seems to just willingly ignore the blatant and massive amount of mathematical anomalies ( not to mention the numerous affidavits and videos)

On topic: 3rd recount should find that maybe the “evidence” was shredded. Or hopefully those watermarks may be a thing...

a reply to: Xtrozero

I wonder if the 9300 Phantom votes for Joe Biden were removed from the recount total?

1 audit location announced this finding last week, the media ignored it, and it went away.

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

Yep. Historically low ballot rejections, and more votes coming in then there are registered voters. Two big red flags in several States.