Dominion Voting Systems Lawyers UP - PA Press Conference

a reply to: Michielli

What trial?

No worries. I'll write a post of my thoughts on Fraud Denial and we'll put it in the #ing mudpit and we'll git after it.

And let's all try to remember, pretty much everything we do here like this is really just a bunch of masturbation. I don't mind...i think the world needs a righteous wank.

a reply to: Michielli

An affidavit without proof — is nothing but hearsay.

So far, they’ve all been tossed.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Michielli

What trial?

That's dumb. The trial the Trump's legal team is preparing for at the moment. Right now they are in the discovery phase.

a reply to: Annee

"Tossed". Hee Hee!

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Michielli

An affidavit without proof — is nothing but hearsay.

So far, they’ve all been tossed.

An affidavit is hard admissible evidence. They are only talking about what they can show the public without disclosing their court case. Just like Trump said a very long time ago before he was President of the United States, which he still is, why are we going on TV telling the world every move we're going to make just before a military strike? It defies logic.

a reply to: Michielli

More accurately: "The pre - losing phase".

originally posted by: Michielli

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Michielli

An affidavit without proof — is nothing but hearsay.

So far, they’ve all been tossed.

An affidavit is hard admissible evidence. They are only talking about what they can show the public without disclosing their court case. Just like Trump said a very long time ago before he was President of the United States, which he still is, why are we going on TV telling the world every move we're going to make just before a military strike? It defies logic.

Admissible doesn’t mean jack.

Talking doesn’t mean jack.

Hard proof is the only thing that matters.

So far, zip.

a reply to: Michielli

An affidavit is hard admissible evidence.

Only if a court accepts it as evidence.

No guarantee of that.

a reply to: Michielli

Admissable evidence - perhaps. "Hard", maybe not.

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Michielli

An affidavit is hard admissible evidence.

Only if a court accepts it as evidence.

No guarantee of that.

Exactly!

There have been affidavits the judge/court has read. None were accepted as proof.

You can swear to:

“I saw this”
“I witnessed this”
“I experienced this”

Ok, prove it.

a reply to: Annee

Yes. They were thrown out of Court. Once the laughter had subsided.

a reply to: Annee

" I seen stuff on the interweb and on YouTube. Must be true."

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Annee

" I seen stuff on the interweb and on YouTube. Must be true."

It’s really getting ridiculous.

I’m not gonna say some stuff didn’t happen, but the extent of systematic pre-planned fraud to make it happen is mind boggling.

Trump is a disaster. Those outside his cult know it. And voted accordingly — even his own party.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

It's actually all of this at the same time. The world is not a binary place.

originally posted by: Annee
You can swear to:

“I saw this”
“I witnessed this”
“I experienced this”

Ok, prove it.

Kind of like the metoo don't ask ANY questions and don't you dare doubt movement?

Or the entire russia russia russia case based on the AFFIDAVIT of one person?

Or Bobulinksi putting his name on the line on national TV to the sound of crickets.

I mean I don't really care if people paint themselves as hypocrites....it's like good ole Oprah told us...people will tell you who they are if you just listen.

originally posted by: Ook33
a reply to: Sookiechacha

It's actually all of this at the same time. The world is not a binary place.

HEY LOOK

LOOK OVER HERE....

THIS PERSON IS WORKING WITH SOMETHING CALLED REASON.

originally posted by: Michielli

originally posted by: Annee
You can swear to:

“I saw this”
“I witnessed this”
“I experienced this”

Ok, prove it.

Kind of like the metoo don't ask ANY questions and don't you dare doubt movement?

Or the entire russia russia russia case based on the AFFIDAVIT of one person?

Or Bobulinksi putting his name on the line on national TV to the sound of crickets.

I mean I don't really care if people paint themselves as hypocrites....it's like good ole Oprah told us...people will tell you who they are if you just listen.

Moving goalposts?

“Pass the Trash”? That’s when you have no argument, you start attaching blame elsewhere.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Michielli

originally posted by: Annee
You can swear to:

“I saw this”
“I witnessed this”
“I experienced this”

Ok, prove it.

Kind of like the metoo don't ask ANY questions and don't you dare doubt movement?

Or the entire russia russia russia case based on the AFFIDAVIT of one person?

Or Bobulinksi putting his name on the line on national TV to the sound of crickets.

I mean I don't really care if people paint themselves as hypocrites....it's like good ole Oprah told us...people will tell you who they are if you just listen.

Moving goalposts?

“Pass the Trash”? That’s when you have no argument, you start attaching blame elsewhere.

Yes you finally got it. I don't have an argument. That's what I keep saying. It looks to me like there was fraud. I personally don't know that. It's fun to discuss but NO ONE HERE is going to prove it.

It's okay though, I know trolls have to get their dopamine somewhere right?

It's just as dumb to be a Fraud Denier as it is to be a Climate Change Denier, In my opinion.