It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jrod
Sidney Powell is a charlatan. Her claims are bogus. I guarantee she will not make those same claims under oath or she would be found guilty of perjury.
It is a shame that lawyers can say blatant lies publically and face no consequences.
Maybe but put yourself in their shoes. If someone called you a rapist or a druggie or a pedophile, etc. and you had unequivocal proof that you were not....would you just not show up for the reveal, lawyer up, and mum's the word or would you bring your unequivocal proof and smack down the accusation? I mean really.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Michielli
Can you make your title clearer?
"Dominion Voting Systems Lawyers UP - PA Press Conference"
originally posted by: jrod
Sidney Powell is a charlatan. Her claims are bogus. I guarantee she will not make those same claims under oath or she would be found guilty of perjury.
It is a shame that lawyers can say blatant lies publically and face no consequences.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Dominion software was used in 24 states during the November 2020 election. Yet, Republicans are only concerned about the use of the software in states where Trump lost.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Dominion software was used in 24 states during the November 2020 election. Yet, Republicans are only concerned about the use of the software in states where Trump lost.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Dominion software was used in 24 states during the November 2020 election. Yet, Republicans are only concerned about the use of the software in states where Trump lost.
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Michielli
Maybe but put yourself in their shoes. If someone called you a rapist or a druggie or a pedophile, etc. and you had unequivocal proof that you were not....would you just not show up for the reveal, lawyer up, and mum's the word or would you bring your unequivocal proof and smack down the accusation? I mean really.
No. I would just utter 4 words which would be relayed by my Solicitor. SEE YOU IN COURT.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: SeaWorthy
Why don't you take the blinders and accept the fact a very unpopular president simply lost the election. Most people did not vote for Biden, they voted against Trump.
Trump's actions will be a permanent stain of the US's democracy.
It only has to be PROVEN ONCE and the whole thing unravels and goes to the United States Congress and they will decide.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Michielli
What is funny is the right will not address that the majority of voting fraud cases have been done by Republicans.
There is nothing to address here, no evidence. There is also a paper record of every vote. If fraud on this scale was suspected, the paper ballots in a precinct can be tallyed and results are compared to the computer's tally. This actually has been done many times in the past with no discrepancies found.
I suppose it is easier for some to believe nut-job conspiracy theories than to accept the fact that the president wirh the lowest approval rating in our lifetime got less votes than the other guy.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Michielli
It only has to be PROVEN ONCE and the whole thing unravels and goes to the United States Congress and they will decide.
It hasn't been proven at all. In fact, the national cyber chief, whose job it was to make sure election software was safe, says there is not any such proof. And then pouty, President Big Brain fired him. Nevertheless, there is still no proof whatsoever.