It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In 2005, a concerned Florida election supervisor asked the Finnish data-security expert Harri Hursti to hack into one of the state’s commonly used voting machines to test its vulnerability. The verdict wasn’t reassuring. By modifying just a few lines of code on the machine’s memory card, Mr. Hursti says, he could change the results of a mock election. That same model, he adds, will be among those used in the 2020 elections. (A spokesperson for the machine’s vendor, Dominion Voting, says that these weaknesses were fixed in 2012, but Mr. Hursti says that he has tested the new version and found the updates insufficient.)
Mr. Hursti has spent the past 15 years trying to draw attention to the weaknesses in America’s voting systems. Last month, he was featured in an HBO documentary called “Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America’s Elections,” about far-reaching security breaches in multiple U.S. elections that he says have gone unfixed. He warns that both the American political establishment and the public are far too complacent. “Once you understand how everything works, you understand how fragile everything is and how easy it is to lose this all,” Mr. Hursti says in the film.
Why A Data Security Expert Fears US Voting Will Be Hacked
Smartmatic’s chairman is a member of the British House of Lords, Mark Malloch Brown, a former vice-chairman of George Soros’ Investment Funds, former vice-president at the World Bank, lead international partner at Sawyer Miller, a political consulting firm, and former vice-chair of the World Economic Forum who “remains deeply involved in international affairs.” The company’s reported globalist ties have caused members of the media and government officials to raise questions about its involvement in the U.S. electoral process.
Officials Raised Concerns About Security of Voting Machines Software Systems
“The main obstacle to a stable and just world order,” Soros has declared, “is the United States.” Ergo, that constitutional republic must be weakened and its allies degraded.
Connoisseur of Chaos: George Soros
Read the executive summary of Media Research's mind-boggling report, "George Soros: Media Mogul." The Hungarian-born billionaire "has managed to insinuate himself and his money into the media culture, making connections with the nation's top publishing organizations. He has direct ties to more than 30 mainstream news outlets -- including The New York Times, Washington Post, the Associated Press, CNN and ABC. Each one of those operations has employees, often high-level ones, on the boards of Soros-funded media operations."
George Soros Bought and Paid America's Media
On April 8, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi headlined a Boston conference on ''media reform.'' She was joined by four other congressmen, a senator, two FCC commissioners, a Nobel laureate and numerous liberal journalists.
The 2,500-person event was sponsored by a group called Free Press, one of more than 180 different media-related organizations that receives money from liberal billionaire George Soros.
.....
That has given Soros far more influence than even many of his harshest critics realize. He has managed to insinuate himself and his money into the media culture, making connections with the nation's top publishing organizations. He has direct ties to more than 30 mainstream news outlets - including The New York Times, Washington Post, the Associated Press, CNN and ABC. Each one of those operations has employees, often high-level ones, on the boards of Soros-funded media operations.
George Soros Media Mogul
“The main obstacle to a stable and just world order,” Soros has declared, “is the United States.” Ergo, that constitutional republic must be weakened and its allies degraded.
Connoisseur of Chaos: George Soros
All I could think was WTF?!? Why would anyone claim to be a winner without counting a million votes? I check later at 11am. 850,000 votes not counted and Biden claiming to win. I check at 5pm, 600,000 votes not counted and Biden claiming to win.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: MapMistress
All I could think was WTF?!? Why would anyone claim to be a winner without counting a million votes? I check later at 11am. 850,000 votes not counted and Biden claiming to win. I check at 5pm, 600,000 votes not counted and Biden claiming to win.
Without arguing whether foul play occurred.... The answer to your question assuming things are done properly, you can predict a winner sometimes with a lot of uncounted ballots because ______ candidate got the right counties. They have enough tallied in those areas vs registered voters to call the county.
Again, I'm not saying whether or not that happened here... But I think knowing that may help the lens you use to look at this.
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: MapMistress
Edit: I think your recollection is off on the numbers too. 99% in with his total vote count being barely more than the lead you remember to have been claimed with lower amounts of votes counted.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
a reply to: MapMistress
Good info, thank you.
By “hacking” do they mean “programmed?” Because what it looks like in places is that the vote counting software was pre-programmed with algorithms to switch votes from Trump to Biden.