Biden win in Arizona ‘confirmed’ as analyst says there is now no way back for Trump

originally posted by: Grimpachi

Biden will be a 4-year president as long as the rights next candidate has some charisma and isn't a giant douche.

Actually Trump has a level of charisma, but ya he is also a Dick. He wouldn't draw the people he does if he had zero charisma like Biden has. Biden will not run again, I would bet my paycheck on that, so that means an open ticket for them and I would rather just have Harris as their front runner since no one likes her either....lol

This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!

All rules for POLITE political debate will be enforced.
Members must also Stay on Topic!!!
Trolling, And What To Do About It


Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)
Is There Civilization Without Civility

You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

I question what you consider decent, so the full legal process has totally played out and the electors have voted? Nope? Ok then. Great chat!



a reply to: djz3ro

a reply to: Rob808

It would help if I knew which post you're replying to. Not seeing one where I used the word decent.

In 2016, Trump was announced by the media, just like Biden was this year. Nobody told the Trumpeteers to wait until the EC vote, correct?

But now Trump has lost it isn't over until the EC vote? Fine, we don't have long to wait but your Orangeboy is holding up the process of transition. He is throwing the mother of all temper tantrums and we can see that is all it is as the court cases to prove fraud fall by the wayside one by one. Straws is all you have left.

And yet again I feel the need to reiterate, I don't think Biden will be good but time will tell. Trump is done, stick a fork in him and let's move on...

AZ does NOt do recounts unless its within a few 100 votes as for Trumps lawsuits DISMISSED !
Trump wants to keep accusing REPUBLICANS who RUN AZ PA GA of allowing cheating he is getting exactly what he is asking for Dismissed .

Oh I’m sure we should be relying on media from the UK to be declaring Biden the winner. Oh yah and the article is full of vagueries, using terms like “ projecting”, and “analysts said they believe“

Clinton conceded. Pay attention to these type of details when comparing any elections.

originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: Rob808

In 2016, Trump was announced by the media, just like Biden was this year. Nobody told the Trumpeteers to wait until the EC vote, correct?

a reply to: SilverRocket

I'm aware, just as Trump should have done but we all knew he wouldn't

originally posted by: SilverRocket
Clinton conceded. Pay attention to these type of details when comparing any elections.

So because Trump stuck his fingers in his ears and screamed 'lalalalalala' he didn't lose?

Yeah, I know, I know, sematic argument about the Electoral College vote inbound but the reality is he lost.

a reply to: Annee

I have no interest in conspiracy for this election.

I just thought I would note that ats is noted for being a conspiracy website. Of course many people have believed that conspiracies are mostly just a theory, but some things are pretty much out in the open and still people refuse to believe.
For instance, there are actual affidavits by actual poll workers as actual “ witnesses”.
So is it just a theory that there has been voter fraud? I’ll tell you what’s a theory... that the fraud they have uncovered doesn’t matter, and people on this website have noted that Biden supporters are big on that one.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: SilverRocket
Clinton conceded. Pay attention to these type of details when comparing any elections.

So because Trump stuck his fingers in his ears and screamed 'lalalalalala' he didn't lose?

Yeah, I know, I know, sematic argument about the Electoral College vote inbound but the reality is he lost.

as I have noted, there are actual poll workers affidavits, which constitutes actual evidence in cases in court. The fraud is so massive as to reek of the banana republics of old. Aside from poll workers issues of deliberately being kept out, there’s the voter machine fraud with software with shares owned by Ms. Pelosi, which issues have been relegated to a “glitch” by Biden supporters. Then there’s the slowdown of vote counting so as to allow for entire vans full of ballots interestingly marked only for Biden and not even for other Democrat races .... then there’s poll worker who took a walk around a parking lot and saw people marking ballots holding the ballots up against the side of the van.
only a fool would think none of this is significant or a concerted effort on a massive scale.

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
as I have noted, there are actual poll workers affidavits, which constitutes actual evidence in cases in court.

And so far not one of them has held up in court.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
as I have noted, there are actual poll workers affidavits, which constitutes actual evidence in cases in court.

And so far not one of them has held up in court.

It doesn’t negate the pervasive use of voter fraud especially used in crucial swing states. As I said, only a fool would think it doesn’t matter.

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
It doesn’t negate the pervasive use of voter fraud especially used in crucial swing states. As I said, only a fool would think it doesn’t matter.

Actually it does, when people sign an affidavit and then are later questioned in court about said affidavit and cannot substantiate the claims made therein it pretty much shoots the whole thing to hell.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
It doesn’t negate the pervasive use of voter fraud especially used in crucial swing states. As I said, only a fool would think it doesn’t matter.

Actually it does, when people sign an affidavit and then are later questioned in court about said affidavit and cannot substantiate the claims made therein it pretty much shoots the whole thing to hell.

Right, and you’ve never heard of judges who throw out claims because they are Democrat appointees. So don’t tell
Me about people putting fingers in their ears saying lalalala. What is more is that Liberty in America is what is at stake here. I’m sure you must know this. It is not simply a fight between an old white guy with obvious dementia and another old white guy who is gruff and verbal. It is a fight between those who desire a totalitarian socialist nanny state who will control our lives and the pay for our labor, and the freedom and liberty which our Founding Fathers fought the Revolutionary War for. Even our First President who as you know believed in The Great Architect and the “squaring of the circle”.
Happy Diwali (which Trump celebrates in the White House)

originally posted by: djz3ro

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: Annee


So the media can say whatever they want, but an election isn't called for either side until the state has certified the votes.

Gotcha, so what you're saying is back in 2015 when the press announced Trump had won you were all (both sides, Left and Right) just taken for gullible fools for being taken in by them until it was confirmed by the Electoral College?

We were amazed by the state votes, and even more amazed when Clinton dropped out without a fight. But it wasn't until the Electors voted in December 2015 that it was official.

a reply to: Teikiatsu

Apart from Bush v Gore, once the election is called, it's customary for the outgoing President to concede without a fight though, isn't it?

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
Right, and you’ve never heard of judges who throw out claims because they are Democrat appointees.

This isn't about throwing out claims, this was about the claimants actually saying that they could not verify what the claimed they attested to.

The judge's full ruling, along with the witnesses not having corroborating evidence, is here.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
Right, and you’ve never heard of judges who throw out claims because they are Democrat appointees.

This isn't about throwing out claims, this was about the claimants actually saying that they could not verify what the claimed they attested to.

The judge's full ruling, along with the witnesses not having corroborating evidence, is here.

No, it means that the court system is run by people who are biased and the testimony of individuals is not valued. www.google.com...
Not to mention biased activists who run things at the state level

The Oakland Press reported on the link in 2010: “...former Oakland County Democratic Party Chairman Mike McGuinness was Benson's former operations director and that McGuinness and former Oakland Democratic Party employee Jason Bauer both contributed to her campaign.”

Jocelyn Benson, a hyper-partisan Democratic staffer and activist – she’s worked for the DNC and the Southern Poverty Law Center, an extremist hate group – with staffers indicted for election fraud is the last person voters can trust to oversee elections.

www.michiganfreedomfund.com...
And that is the same state as the governor who locked down her state and arrested people for keeping their businesses open, and you wonder why people are trying to stop the nanny statism, including our own Potus who should remain Potus because he has been the only one Roth enough money and guts to fight.
I would mention that Thomas More was imprisoned and killed for standing up for truth and principal. You can of course read that still in the History books.

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
No, it means that the court system is run by people who are biased and the testimony of individuals is not valued. www.google.com...

Thanks for quoting another article that proves my point, no actual corroborating witness testimony in that one either.

It's almost like theirs a pattern developing, do you see it? People lie and make things up and then get to court and can't prove them.