It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I absolutely agree and don't know what to make of it.
originally posted by: ManSizedSquirrel
a reply to: Jonjonj
Okay this is tripping me out. That is 100% not Hillary Clinton. There has to be a logical explanation for this. With the ability to pull off "deep fakes" now, I would expect this to look at least a little like the beast.
originally posted by: xuenchen
It's one of the actress doubles that play Hillary for specific reasons 😎
Like the one that played her for that funeral appearance and one that played her on that 9/11 day she collapsed and miraculously recovered 😎
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: HalWesten
So why the hell would Reuters claim it is do you think? Are they self exposing the media as blatant liars? Do they think people will actually believe it is her?
Are they memory holing or Mandelaing her>
It is so weird!
originally posted by: Cameoii
This woman isn't Hillary, but Hillary did speak on the full version of the video. For what ever reason Reuters video starts further along after Hillary speaks at the very beginning. The woman from this video is introduced as Ambassador something or other...I never could quite make it out...
originally posted by: angelchemuel
a reply to: JonjonjWithin 2 minutes of watching that video my first was....what's happened to Hillaty's face? Is she on some sort of steroid medication to blow her face up like that? Then I thought, no because even if I take the puffiness of her face away that does not look like hillary....then the voice...so not Hillary.
Then I scrolled down and saw the comments....I concur that's not Hillary!
Rainbows
Jane