Trump, on the way out the door...

a reply to: HalWesten

I want to know what ET stuff we have.

Totally. 100% agree.

But I do reckon Trump would have been considered a liability if he knew any UFo info as his history of talking while in an emotional state might have been a black flag to disclosing that stuff to him..?

Don’t get me wrong, I’d love for him to know in order to spill the beans. I just don’t think he has any beans to spill

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: abe froman

He doesn't know nothin. Not a high enough clearance.

Presidents are temps workers. 4-8 yrs n out. They have no need-to-know.

Yep, presidents are clearly just a puppet/shop front so the public think they have a voice

Of course Trump could get a message from the Puppet Masters saying “Remember JFK”


JFK being assassinated by the CIA to stop him from disclosure of Aliens has been a top conspiracy for the longest.

(.....”The president sent a letter to the head of the CIA only 10 days before he was killed, it is claimed“....)

Here’s one of the many tabloid stories ...

JFK 'was murdered by CIA after demanding spooks release top secret UFO files'

Source Link: www.mirror.co.uk...

a reply to: Raggedyman

Some don't get it. Don't want them...years later divuldging things.

Term power....then J.Q.Citizen again.

What? Give them all to a "temp" employee??? Never did...

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: noonebutme
a reply to: abe froman

If any of it were true, I highly suspect none of it was made aware to Trump.

I mean, the guy is a complete f*ckwit and spews whatever he wants on Twitter. Doesn’t seem the sort you’d confide highly classified info to 😂

He's definitely not a f*ckwit (just because you don't like him) seeing that he's had more success than nearly any other president. If Trump wanted information on aliens and UFO's, you can bet your life earnings that he got it. That's just the kind of aggressive guy he is. Plus, receiving highly classified information is how he was able to end ISIS.

Your romanticized view of Donald Trump is really something 🤣🤣

Have you watched the Donald Trump episode of the docuseries "Dirty Money"?

The guy is REALLY dim, everything about him is a facade

Who do you all suppose is the keeper of of all this "disclosure" information? I find this fascinating, more so than the UFO stories itself. For me, no one knows the answers and no one seems to care. They spent time to decide there was no immediate threat from our enemies here on the globe, and not from somewhere else. That's why they close project blue book, they don't know either.

I mean, I hope they aren't paying billions of dollars to some folks sitting in a room somewhere in a classified bunker trying to figure out what all the pretty lights are LoL

a reply to: vance

we will find out...
in FOUR years.

a reply to: noonebutme

If Trump had put his father Fred's 300 plus million
he got from him, into a passbook savings account
with simple interest, he'd be genuinely wealthy,

not propped up by money laundered by Russia
through Deutsche bank,

and he's had to personally sign for the last loans,
so when they come due, soon, Deutsche bank
could seize most of what he owns.

He's not only a bad businessman, he's one of
the worst ever to live.

originally posted by: noonebutme
a reply to: HalWesten

I want to know what ET stuff we have.

Totally. 100% agree.

But I do reckon Trump would have been considered a liability if he knew any UFo info as his history of talking while in an emotional state might have been a black flag to disclosing that stuff to him..?

Don’t get me wrong, I’d love for him to know in order to spill the beans. I just don’t think he has any beans to spill

Q drop

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 98088e No.3094236 📁 2222
Sep 19 2018 19:25:34 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 5948d8 No.3093831 📁
Sep 19 2018 19:10:44 (EST)
Q

Are we alone ?

Roswell ?
>>3093831
No.
Highest classification.
Consider the vastness of space.
Q

The String Pullers....

a reply to: noonebutme

i think all presidents get alittle info on the subject.


the goverment even released photos of 'ufo's and authenticated the videos


you don't think the sitting POTUS wouldn't ask the JCOS what the tic tac was?

what are they going to say to him you don't have a need to know?....get real

I don't think anyone knows what's really going on with true ufo's

what if that tic tac was some new Russian drone with some breakthrough propulsion that we have also been working on, you can bet you bottom dollar he got the low down on the tictac and what we have to defend against it(if it wasn't ours)

you don't think the POTUS isn't going to get briefed on major sightings when they are in office? what do you think they told the POTUS when the Arizona huge ufo happened?

sorry sir you don't have a need to know about aircraft breaking into our airspace uncontested and undetected......right


POTUS might not know how these secret craft work or where they are hangered, but you would have to be crazy to think they dont know we have them.

If a serious war broke out between the US and say China you don't think the president has every option on the table including classified aircraft?

my bet is the government just has better pictures and other sensor data and knows just as much as we do about 'aliens'

If you knew all the secrets would you tell the orange blob.

Here’s a post I posted in another thread for those who have not read it ....but imo relevant to this topic title:


Well here’s a nice Nicky Sun story in connection with Trump and Disclosure all in the same breath...dated Oct 30 2020 ....

CLOSE ENCOUNTER UFO sightings are taking the US by storm – can Trump shake up the election by FINALLY revealing what the Pentagon knows?

Source Link: www.the-sun.com...

Got to hand it to him.... Nicky still remains in the limelight...

Here’s a complete article....which after reading, Imo, gives me the gut feeling, Disclosure under a Biden presidency is not going to happen. Looks like Biden may not be into all thing’s Space...which includes UFO’s although not mentioned, but behind the scenes of course...

From Space Force to Artemis: what Joe Biden presidency may mean in orbit and beyond

(Ian Whittaker, Nottingham Trent University, Gareth Dorrian, University of Birmingham
November 11, 2020 12.04pm GMT)

Donald Trump set bold goals for space exploration during his time in office – from crewed missions to the Moon and Mars to a Space Force. By contrast, his successor Joe Biden has been relatively quiet on space policy. So how is space exploration likely to change going forward?

It is clear is that there will be change. NASA’s current chief, Jim Bridenstine, has already announced he is stepping down. And we know that US human spaceflight policy rarely survives a change in presidency.

That said, the amazing success of the crewed SpaceX launch to the International Space Station (ISS), however, means the commercial crew programme is likely to keep running – taking the burden off NASA. Indeed, the first operational flight of the Crew Dragon by commercial company SpaceX is due for launch on November 14, with four astronauts bound for the ISS.

During the Trump administration, NASA also committed to the return of astronauts to the Moon in 2024 under the Artemis program. This is due for its first test launch (uncrewed) next year with Artemis-1. This builds on the Constellation program which was implemented by Republican president George W Bush in 2005 but was subsequently cancelled by Democratic president Barack Obama due to its high cost and difficulty.

The only substantial clue as to the direction of a Biden presidency with regard to astronaut flights to the Moon can be found in a document by the Democratic Party entitled “Building a Stronger, Fairer Economy”. In one paragraph, the Democrats state that they “support NASA’s work to return Americans to the Moon and go beyond to Mars, taking the next step in exploring our solar system.”

No detail is offered on possible timelines. But, with international cooperation now a major feature of the Artemis program, it would be difficult for a fledgling Biden administration to unilaterally withdraw from the project. For example, Canada, the European Space Agency and Japan are all formal partners in the construction of the Lunar Gateway – a lunar orbiting outpost designed to support multiple expeditions to the surface.

The programme is also rapidly advancing research, particularly in terms of building materials, power supplies and food production. Just this week, the European Space Agency awarded a contract to the British company Metalysis to develop techniques to simultaneously extract oxygen and metals from lunar soil.

The Trump administration also pushed for a first crewed mission to Mars in the 2030s – a much more difficult task due to the distances involved. The long journey would put astronauts at risk of high radiation exposure and psychological difficulties. Other huge challenges include weight restrictions and communication times.

An independent report by the Science and Technology Policy Institute in 2019 stated that a crewed Mars mission in the 2030s is currently unfeasible. It is unlikely Biden will try to resurrect this any time soon.

One of the more questionable implementations by the Trump administration was the formation of Space Force – a branch of the armed forced in space. The move highlights that the US views space as a potential war zone rather than a domain of purely scientific venture. But US citizens aren’t too impressed with the Space Force, mocking the logo and the uniforms. Indeed, the programme has public approval rating of only 31%.

So will it be scrapped? The disbanding of a branch of the armed forces has not been performed in the US before and there are doubtlessly many difficulties of reintegrating this back into the US Air Force. It is therefore likely to stay, possibly with reduced focus.

A fresh start for NASA?

Can we expect anything new? Biden has already pledged to sign executive orders that will undo most of the Trump administration’s work – in the same way that Trump undid most of Obama’s work.

The biggest indication of change is Bridenstine stepping down. When he was appointed in 2018, it was something of a surprise to the scientific community – he had no scientific qualifications and had previously indicated that he had doubts about climate change (which he changed his mind about when accepting the role). Yet he has proved to be an able leader of NASA.

On stepping down, he said he wanted to let somebody with a “close relationship with the president” take over. Who this might be is still a question, and will depend largely on the new president himself. Most heads of NASA have at least a degree in engineering or physics and, in the past, have headed a space centre. This makes Jody Singer (the director of Marshall Space Flight Center), Mark Geyer (the director of Johnson Space Center), or Dennis Andrucyk (the director of Goddard Space Flight Center) potential candidates, as well as the current deputy administrator James Morhard. The field is thought to be largely open, though.

Biden wants to tackle climate change. Biden has made it clear that tackling the climate emergency is a priority. While this is likely to be focused on industrial pollution limits and renewable energy sources, it does suggest that space policy could be more focused on Earth observation missions, such as the GOES (Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite) programme.

Potentially we could be looking at more satellites of this type; monitoring oil spills, deforestation and carbon emissions. All of these possibilities are of course overshadowed by the financial crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. And, given that a sustained source of money to support long-term projects such as the Artemis program is vital to their success, it is probably a case of believing it when we see it.

Whatever the changes will be, it seems likely that there may be less funding for space missions. But, despite that, many scientists will be breathing a sigh of relief at the prospect of not having to fight the kind of anti-science tweets that we have seen from Trump during his time in office on topics ranging from Covid-19 and vaccinations to climate change.

Exactly what I’ve been wondering. He would do it too!

a reply to: abe froman

If Trump wanted to disclose anything he had 4 years to do so.
But nothing came.

originally posted by: noonebutme

originally posted by: LSU2018
... he's had more success than nearly any other president.

Such as...?

If Trump wanted information on aliens and UFO's, you can bet your life earnings that he got it. That's just the kind of aggressive guy he is. Plus, receiving highly classified information is how he was able to end ISIS.

He didn’t end ISIS. It’s still very much alive and well, just no longer focused publicly in and around Iraq. All he did was drop some ammunition and disperse them. He hasn’t done anything to defuse the tensions or build relations. ISIS still hates America and western beliefs. Donny Trumperton did nothing to ‘fix’ that.

Funny how you Americans are painted a very different picture in the US than what the rest of the world sees.

What do you mean, "such as?" Don't give me that sh.t...

What's funny is how parts of the world are painted a different picture about what the US does. You're complaining because Trump didn't build relations with a country that chants "death to America" and you complain when he does build relationships with countries like North Korea. Spare me the drama, queen.

a reply to: Lucidparadox

Nah, I've been watching for the last 4 years and that's enough for me to draw my conclusions about his presidential actions. If people cared about what presidents did prior to being the president then Obama would've never made it, Clinton would have never made it, and Bush II would have never made it.

I don't have a romanticized view of Trump, I just know that he always put my country first and he was aggressive enough to get most of the things he wanted from the government. I really don't care how much of a facade someone has as long as they do the right things when they have the power. Unless you actually prefer a crap economy, high taxes, no fossil fuels, pointless climate wars, resurgence of terror groups, high unemployment, jobs going back overseas, etc., then you would be able to see all of the good Trump has done for our country.

originally posted by: abe froman
Any chance Trump could spill the beans on his way out?

He said he knew something "interesting" about Roswell.

He has certainly been briefed about Gofast/Gimbal etc.

I could almost see him in a final press conference say " Oh by the way, UFOs, aliens, etc are..."

Are you referring to in 2024?