It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Postal worker admits fabricating allegations of ballot tampering, officials say

page: 3
32
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:07 PM
link   
If you mad leave the thread😂

a reply to: Lumenari



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:09 PM
link   
 




 


(post by DBCowboy removed for a manners violation)
+1 more 
posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Falenor
a reply to: Ophiuchus 13

Here's a video from the postal worker himself Richard Hopkins, he's saying he didn't recant.





Quoted this video again. You seemed to have missed it with your tourettes kicking in.



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:10 PM
link   
"I did not recant". Edit: seems were all being helpful today. Oh well. seems the help is needed. One more repeat might just make the point.


edit on 10-11-2020 by Halfswede because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:10 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:11 PM
link   
Project Veritas Just released:

RECORDING: Federal agents “coerce” USPS whistleblower Hopkins to water down story

RECORDING: Federal agents “coerce” USPS whistleblower Hopkins to water down story. Hopkins doubles down...

Agent Strasser: “I am trying to twist you a little bit”

“I am scaring you here”...” we have Senators involved...DOJ involved...reason they called me is to try to harness.”

www.youtube.com...




posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:11 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:13 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:14 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:15 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:16 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Lumenari

The OP is a coward who worships tyrants Little Sister.

He/She can't actually use facts to dispute this so he/she uses non sequitures to retaliate which actually exposes he/she as a troll or a blind ideologue.


C'mon now...

You have children.

Remember when they were two or three and had these horrible tantrums and all you heard was the screaming and the crying and the blowing of snot and squirting of tears?

This is the same thing but with an adult.

It's funny.



And common unfortunately.



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
Ignorance denied...
Try PG 2 😂
a reply to: xuenchen



Just a small pile of hinges 🦇🎩



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:17 PM
link   




originally posted by: Halfswede
"I did not recant". Edit: seems were all being helpful today. Oh well. seems the help is needed. One more repeat might just make the point.


edit on 11/10/20 by Ophiuchus 13 because: Because they are funny lol



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13





quote]originally posted by: Halfswede
"I did not recant". Edit: seems were all being helpful today. Oh well. seems the help is needed. One more repeat might just make the point.




For who? You or us?



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:20 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
Watch the denial post start.
Just because you're in denial does not mean the rest of the world is so gullible.


Quoted for epic-level irony



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:25 PM
link   
But again it’s all garbage like usual. If Richard Hopkins recanted which he probably did because he knew what federal charges would be upon him for his lies, It would be just as easy for him to say he was forced to recant so he feels like less of a jackass and can save face with his project V acorn buddy
edit on 10-11-2020 by TheAlleghenyGentleman because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 10 2020 @ 07:29 PM
link   
a reply to: TheAlleghenyGentleman

Yea. Integrity is gone. Hes going to need a lawyer and go on the offensive to get it back with evidence of coercion.

As noted on the first page, he specifically mentioned not trusting whistle blower protections based on past experience from the initial interview. His judgment was correct apparently.



new topics

top topics



 
32
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join