It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If there was anything "nefarious", why is no one in jail? Because there was nothing "nefarious"
Please list the "nefarious" things that came out of the DNC hacks and Wikileaks releases?
Now, please explain the "nefarious" things that the Russians did to deprive Trump his election win this time around, and help Joe Biden.
Schumer: Trump 'really dumb' for attacking intelligence agencies
thehill.com...
New Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday that President-elect Donald Trump is "being really dumb" by taking on the intelligence community and its assessments on Russia's cyber activities.
"Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you," Schumer told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow.
Post where I made such a claim.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: neutronflux
Last time, according the US Intel, Russians hacked the DNC computers, stole sensitive campaign documents and correspondence and had WikiLeaks publish them, in order to hurt Hillary Clinton's chances and help Donald Trump.
What did Russia do this time to help Joe Biden and hurt Donald Trump?
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Sookiechacha
And if the published papers had nothing nefarious, why would they hurt Hilary’s chances?
That sounds like a sanctioned threat.
I've challenged you provide any evidence that Russia did anything to benefit Biden and hurt Trump, in the way the US Intel Community has accused Russia of doing it in 2016.
Schumer: Trump 'really dumb' for attacking intelligence agencies
thehill.com...
New Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday that President-elect Donald Trump is "being really dumb" by taking on the intelligence community and its assessments on Russia's cyber activities.
"Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you," Schumer told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: neutronflux
That sounds like a sanctioned threat.
Old news but good advice. Remember the Kennedy family and the wrath they drew from J. Edgar Hoover.
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: neutronflux
How can a group that seriously bought into the lie Putin was the reason Trump was elected scoff at a group with real concerns over vote counting anomalies? And act like rigging an election is impossible? After claiming for years it happened.
I think there seems to be a massive misunderstanding
The claim in 2016 was that the Russian government interfered with the election to bring about a victory for Trump. It has been proven that the Russians did indeed interfere with the election.
The claim was never that the Russians had rigged the election in some fraudulent way such as dumping a pile of Trump votes in PA or something like that. In fact nobody I can recall actually seriously said that trump won due to voter fraud.
This is apples and oranges then.
Furthermore no actual proof has so far been presented that I have seen that seriously points to large scale voter fraud.
I really wish science could study your brain to understand how such convoluted thoughts and lack of logic occur. It is truly fascinating.