FBI Child P/Abduction Investigator signed Hunter Biden computer subpoena

According to The Western Journal, a December federal court subpoena issued by the FBI to seize Hunter's laptop and a hard drive had personal details redacted, but through the back side of one of pages there is a signature that is just barely evident. The signature belongs to FBI Special Agent Joshua Wilson, who, as The Western Journal point out, isn’t just some bureau pencil-pusher. Special Agent Joshua Wilson has a long history of dealing with child pornography, child exploitation and child abduction. (See this article and this article.)

Here is Special Agent Wilson's signature on a document from 2012 (signature circled in red)...


This is the signature that appears from the back side of the scan of the subpoena from December related to Hunter's computer (also circled in red)...


So, it looks like an FBI Special Agent who focuses on child exploitation and trafficking is involved in the matter.

As Alice exclaimed in Wonderland, "Curiouser and curiouser!" And this rabbit hole is at least as deep as any in Wonderland
:

edit on 2020 10 16 by incoserv because: exchange images for better ones.

a reply to: incoserv

Also Hunter Biden's former business partner has flipped and is now a cooperating witness against Hunter.

mobile.twitter.com...

Everything leads back to Godfather Joe, as Hunter admitted in the interview he conducted with CBS News earlier in the year.

a reply to: incoserv

It appears that the signature is not reversed, but is written normally, yet the image has been enhanced to the extent the we can see the reversed text through the paper.

It seems more likely from this, that another document was signed while resting on top of this document, and the faint impression of the signature is what is showing.

This fits with the evidence far more than the allegation that this investigator was involved in this case.

It does not indicate that this signature was signed to this document.

Will Hunter die in confinement? Or, will he die of a meth overdose before arraignment?

I am going with the second option.

And then Grandpa Sniffs can play it off like a deep misfortune to get some sympathy votes???

Man, this is tougher than corn pop man!

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: incoserv

Also Hunter Biden's former business partner has flipped and is now a cooperating witness against Hunter.

mobile.twitter.com...

Everything leads back to Godfather Joe, as Hunter admitted in the interview he conducted with CBS News earlier in the year.

And Twitter to delete in 1...2....3....666....

a reply to: Fools

The Senate should stop playing games with Facebook and Twitter. Instead, they should focus on subpoenaing Joe and Hunter Biden with the election just 18 days away.

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: incoserv

It appears that the signature is not reversed, but is written normally, yet the image has been enhanced to the extent the we can see the reversed text through the paper.

It seems more likely from thins that another document was signed while resting on top of this document and the impression of the signature is what is showing faintly.

It does not indicate that this signature was signed to this document.

Wrong and wrong!

First, the shadow signature in the second image is too dark to just be an impression. An impression would not show up that clearly in a scan.

Second - if you will take note - the second image has been flipped horizontally. The typed words are backward in the image as presented. This would indicate that the image circled in red in the second image was originally backward, meaning that it was signed on the back side of the sheet in question, making it part of the original document.

a reply to: carewemust


That they should, but since there are probably quite a few Senators on the R side that have possibly equal damage to be done to themselves should certain information get out, I am betting they won't.

a reply to: chr0naut

I initially agreed with you, but then I realized the type is reversed, meaning the image was flipped, probably to show the similarities between the two signatures. When you flip the image the correct way, the signature is then reversed. I hope I explained that well since I've been away from the site for too long to remember how to embed a pic to show you what I mean....lol

ETA: Sorry, incoserv, I didn't realize you had already pointed this out!

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: incoserv

Also Hunter Biden's former business partner has flipped and is now a cooperating witness against Hunter.

mobile.twitter.com...

Everything leads back to Godfather Joe, as Hunter admitted in the interview he conducted with CBS News earlier in the year.

That link didn't last long...

LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON

This could be good news, or horrible news.

This cult has people everywhere in positions of power, if you don’t join they dig up leverage on you, if they can’t find any they just fake some.

I just hope there’s enough good people left to actually punish these monsters

originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: incoserv

It appears that the signature is not reversed, but is written normally, yet the image has been enhanced to the extent the we can see the reversed text through the paper.

It seems more likely from thins that another document was signed while resting on top of this document and the impression of the signature is what is showing faintly.

It does not indicate that this signature was signed to this document.

Wrong and wrong!

First, the shadow signature in the second image is too dark to just be an impression. An impression would not show up that clearly in a scan.

Second - if you will take note - the second image has been flipped horizontally. The typed words are backward in the image as presented. This would indicate that the image circled in red in the second image was originally backward, meaning that it was signed on the back side of the sheet in question, making it part of the original document.

Oh, yes, I see. That is probably the case.

After examining the source image, it isn't a scanned image but is clearly a photograph of the document and at a fairly low resolution.

Also, this is a District Court Subpoena Document, not an FBI investigation document. It does not identify the person to whom it is addressed, nor does it identify that a laptop or any other specific documentary evidence is required under the subpoena. It does not evidence that this document says what is alleged.

It could very well be stock footage for all we can tell.

a reply to: incoserv

As Chanel Rion of OAN stated after having a chance to look at some of the material on crack head hunters laptop...

"underage obsessions"

The Biden Crime family is going down and they will be taking a whole lot of people with them.

Treason, Crimes against humanity, etc on down the line.

originally posted by: incoserv
According to The Western Journal, a December federal court subpoena issued by the FBI to seize Hunter's laptop and a hard drive had personal details redacted, but through the back side of one of pages there is a signature that is just barely evident. The signature belongs to FBI Special Agent Joshua Wilson, who, as The Western Journal point out, isn’t just some bureau pencil-pusher. Special Agent Joshua Wilson has a long history of dealing with child pornography, child exploitation and child abduction. (See this article and this article.)

Here is Special Agent Wilson's signature on a document from 2012 (signature circled in red)...

This is the signature that appears from the back side of the scan of the subpoena from December related to Hunter's computer (also circled in red)...

So, it looks like an FBI Special Agent who focuses on child exploitation and trafficking is involved in the matter.

As Alice exclaimed in Wonderland, "Curiouser and curiouser!" And this rabbit hole is at least as deep as any in Wonderland
:

Now that is some excellent sleuthing.....

I had heard this but not seen the signatures.

This tells me that the only reason they took this seriously is because there was CP on one or all 3 of the devices left at the IT shop.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

Now that is some excellent sleuthing.....

I had heard this but not seen the signatures.

This tells me that the only reason they took this seriously is because there was CP on one or all 3 of the devices left at the IT shop.

You want to see some "excellent sleuthing,, check out my recently posted lead on the provenance of this information ...

originally posted by: chr0naut
Oh, yes, I see. That is probably the case.

After examining the source image, it isn't a scanned image but is clearly a photograph of the document and at a fairly low resolution.

Also, this is a District Court Subpoena Document, not an FBI investigation document. It does not identify the person to whom it is addressed, nor does it identify that a laptop or any other specific documentary evidence is required under the subpoena. It does not evidence that this document says what is alleged.

It could very well be stock footage for all we can tell.

Western Journal claims that document to be from the original subpoena. I'm trusting in old fashioned journalistic integrity on that.

Yeah, I know ...

originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: chr0naut
Oh, yes, I see. That is probably the case.

After examining the source image, it isn't a scanned image but is clearly a photograph of the document and at a fairly low resolution.

Also, this is a District Court Subpoena Document, not an FBI investigation document. It does not identify the person to whom it is addressed, nor does it identify that a laptop or any other specific documentary evidence is required under the subpoena. It does not evidence that this document says what is alleged.

It could very well be stock footage for all we can tell.

Western Journal claims that document to be from the original subpoena. I'm trusting in old fashioned journalistic integrity on that.

Yeah, I know ...

Also, the response was due on this subpoena 17 December last year, so it must have been posted earlier than that.

And Western Journal were just basing their article on the New York Post's photo of the subpoena.

a reply to: incoserv

The 2ed image the name is different. Looks more like someone trying to forge that signature.
Look how neat and tight the first name is. How the two loops on the first letter are very oval shaped. And the bottom loop aims away from the rest of the name.

The bottom name has large more round loops. The entire name is less neat and tight.
The bottom loop aims under the rest of the name not away.

What we need are some more known to be real examples of his signature. See if it's always very neat and tidy looking or if it gets sloppy like the 2ed name.