Absolute Proof the Earth is Round NOT Flat!

Everyone knows the earth is round.

Just like a pancake is.

Duhuh

originally posted by: charlyv
The only proof you need is using seismology to localize an earthquake.
No spherical Earth, no seismology would ever work.

That's not free to play and requires extensive training.

Too difficult I'd never know either way because no access.

I mean all I gotta do is go to space and look down right? Oh yeah that costs billions to achieve...

the rooster a reply to: caterpillage

a reply to: midnightstar

Since water and air are trapped here and add to the mass of the planet we should consider them as integral and intrinsic to the body of "Earth".

Because if we only designated the rocky substances as the planet places like Saturn would be considered incredibly tiny (in the event our hypothesis that it is mostly gas and liquid is mostly true).

Guys, the positive side of all this is that I somehow did something inside me where now everything I touch gets turned upside down.

Who knew you could definitively prove the Earth was round then get skunk treatment?

Look how backwards I made it.

I'll just say what everyone is thinking:
"See guys ATS is a govt psy op and they are actively covering up round earth!"

Mwahahaha

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: charlyv
The only proof you need is using seismology to localize an earthquake.
No spherical Earth, no seismology would ever work.

That's not free to play and requires extensive training.

Too difficult I'd never know either way because no access.

I mean all I gotta do is go to space and look down right? Oh yeah that costs billions to achieve...

apparently it only costs 100k....

pocket change lol

a reply to: Akragon

I have to build my own space program so billions.

I can't trust hitching a ride on someone else's rocket, for all I know its a simulation chamber and the windows are high resolution tv's giving me the "immersion" I desire.

They can simulate Gs and low gravity too so...

I gotta build my own like Mad Mike.
But I wanna survive so I'm going to spend billions lol.

originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: Nothin

I said absolute proof as a challenge.

I was demanding a fight rather than making a claim of absolute.

I dare anyone to undo me.

Not interested in fighting with ya. Am enjoying many of your thought=processes that you have shared with us, as you unbecome false, a little more every day.
But this thread ..... ahhhhhhhh LoL !

Seems to me : that just as you noted that we can't consider all of the probabilities, we therefore can't be absolutely sure about anything, no ?

Didn't you find that my remark about taking a photo of the sun under the clouds, showed the possible absurdity of your claim ?

The albedo consideration ?

a reply to: muzzleflash

Well done for telling us what we've known for 1000's of years

a reply to: Nothin

I already explained albedo in the OP.

I said it can't be a reflection or we would have evidence the bottom of clouds light up all day from reflections.

Paraphrased, not sure my wording.

But basically we'd have orange/gold/yellow cloud bottoms quite regularly.

Except I've never seen that happen once. During the day the bottoms of clouds are only lit by ambient light not direct rays (which are golden).

originally posted by: ziplock9000
a reply to: muzzleflash

Well done for telling us what we've known for 1000's of years

Except no one's ever pointed it out to my knowledge since this recent phase of flat earth drama began.

I haven't found any direct references even in the "top reasons earth is round" lists out there.

If this was all over I wouldnt post it.

I almost never post rehashes, I focus on new original content that comes from inside me.

If someone else is doing it it already loses value to me as even a consideration.

Interestingly I posted this thread primarily to scold round earth believers for their ignorance, arrogance, and apathy.

They were just using copied work from others - they didn't do their own homework and I can tell because no one was talking about how this cloud under-lighting phenomena is actually the best method to show it must be and has to be round.

I did my homework and showed my work.

If I'm grading everyone's papers Im giving all round earthers a zero for copying and all the flat earthers a 50% for effort.

I'm not very upset with flaters but I'm very disappointed with all these cheaters who act like they're so smart. They aren't.

originally posted by: Nothin

originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: Nothin

I said absolute proof as a challenge.

I was demanding a fight rather than making a claim of absolute.

I dare anyone to undo me.

Not interested in fighting with ya. Am enjoying many of your thought=processes that you have shared with us, as you unbecome false, a little more every day.
But this thread ..... ahhhhhhhh LoL !

Seems to me : that just as you noted that we can't consider all of the probabilities, we therefore can't be absolutely sure about anything, no ?

Didn't you find that my remark about taking a photo of the sun under the clouds, showed the possible absurdity of your claim ?

The albedo consideration ?

Well I didn't think you'd want to fight lol.
Or anyone really.

I had to lay the gauntlet down and draw the line in the sand.

I am more sure about this than nearly anything, Trumps probably just an actor and they could be taking the Mars Rovers I dunno but its possible.

This case here is about Geometry alone.

I challenge them, anyone, to create a diagram that shows how this phenomenon is possible on a flat earth. And it must be consistent with all observations and logical analysis, and confirmable by others who want to work it out to check for themselves.

It cannot be done to my knowledge and is the crux of the entire ordeal. The diagram.

a reply to: Nothin

I'm sure you know that I am a fairly uncertain person most of the time.

Sometimes I assume or guess or just speculate.

Rarely am I 100% sure.

But this the geometry of a straight line here, Im completely sure straight lines must be straight.

I'd gladly wager my life that I'm right.
There's simply no way to lose this, it is so safe a bet. Almost no bets are anywhere near this sure.

No one can undo this.
Not even me and that's one of my main abilities, in most topics I can argue any side and make it sound good.

In this one I can't beat it.
I have no faith any human has a chance in hell to achieve this diagram. It's impossible.

originally posted by: imdfreek
the rooster a reply to: caterpillage

Where did the rooster come from?
Live birth?
Instant manifestation?

Clearly the rooster began as an egg.

Eggs predate all birds though.
Eggs were first definitely.

a reply to: caterpillage

the egg, and that's a fact. chickens are hybrids / cross breed of jungle fowl.

a reply to: Nothin

I really loved how you phrased that "becoming unfalse" lol.

Well, we gotta try at least!

Thank you for posting here I really enjoy your sparring because I know you're honest and sincere about your ideas.

That's a rare quality please don't lose it.

originally posted by: muzzleflash



This case here is about Geometry alone.

I challenge them, anyone, to create a diagram that shows how this phenomenon is possible on a flat earth. And it must be consistent with all observations and logical analysis, and confirmable by others who want to work it out to check for themselves.

It cannot be done to my knowledge and is the crux of the entire ordeal. The diagram.

As you simply want a diagram how a light can shine from below to above it's similar as a lamp and a table. The table has edges, the flat earth has edges. You can place the light source next to the table but below the plane of the table top and still light the ceiling.

I don't feel like drawing anything so forgive my stupid typing.


CCCCCCCCCCCC
AAAAAAAAAAARR
FFFFFFFFFFFFFERR
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBS

C = CLOUD
A = AIR
R = SUNRAY
F = FLAT PANCAKE
E = EDGE OF PANCAKE
B = BELOW
S = SUN

I'm not a flat earther but the diagram is so simple.

The flat earth is this flying pancake in the realm of the spaghetti monster.
The clouds above the flat earth are the clouds in question.
No one says the sun can not below the plane of the flat earth. So put the sun below the plane of the pancake, make sure it is not underneath the pancake and its rays will shine to the underside of the clouds.

originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: muzzleflash

Does god have a navel?

Chicken dont have a navel.
so god is a chicken

Here is a picture of earth... Does it look like a ball bitches? When I turn this picture on its side it is flat.... Drops mic....

a reply to: Dumbass

Ok for Devils advocate, since you missed my responses on page 2 and 3 addressing this very issue - how come if its a pancake and the sun goes below it then above it - that it is dark in one city while light in another?

Mountains aren't tall enough to explain this.

Get a flashlight and show me how to light up sections of the pancake surface (without trickery).

That's why its geometry.
It's impossible to work out a working model here.

Funny enough the round model explains everything we observe perfectly with zero qualms. It all adds up.

This is an Occams razor moment.