PCR has never before been approved by the FDA to test for infectious diseases…

This really caught my eye... if true it is one more nail in their coffin .


Here is an FDA document showing that PCR has never before been approved by the FDA to test for infectious diseases…


Spiro Twitter

The PCR test only has 'emergency' authorization for COVID-1984

But it`s just the flu right? we dont need to lockdown the World because of the flu...


WHO (Accidentally) Confirms Covid is No More Dangerous Than Flu

Head of Health Emergencies Program “best estimates” put IFR at 0.14%

a reply to: Kenzo

At the bottom of the site that you linked it says "no purported facts have been verified". Doesn't seem like the most trustworthy source for info.

Also, the numbers they're using to figure out covids fatality vs. the flu are kind of statistically...manipulated in a way that doesn't tell the whole story and doesn't take into account pandemic responses in individual populations.

a reply to: Atsbhct

Well not verified is what it says, i dont know much else. It`s not clear yes/no ...just not verified.

a reply to: Kenzo

PCR isn't a test in itself it multiplies DNA strands.

The results are what's tested.

If I boiled a red cabbage and used the dyed water to check if a substance was alkaline or acid based and the liquid thus turned red, would you claim the results are flawed because cabbage isn't an approved universal indicator?

Because that's what you're doing here. It's the results that's important. Again, PCR isn't a test in itself.

Is PCR like the the lite version of PBR?

No way I’m drinking that crap. Ew.

Did the stats account for the roughly 30% of Covid deaths that were really caused by Cancer, ,suicide, shark attacks, falling down stairs, parachute mishaps and avalanches?

I guess we all might know much better of what really is a PCR test much later LOL

I have heard of a lot of reports that the inventor of this kit said it should not be used for large scale testing like what it has been. He was from Europe and died about a year ago.

A couple of problems i see with it.

1/ It only samples a small part of a specific genetic sequence. With all kinds of biological matter around there is a risk of false positives due to other sources.

2/ Each replication process does have an error rate. As trace amounts of genetic material gets further magnified there is a risk of garbage results.

Good to hear the FDA doing something right if they never approved this kind of testing.

a reply to: kwakakev

I find this article recently about the PCR


What is Covid-19, SARS-2. How is it Tested? How is It Measured? The Fear Campaign Has No Scientific Basis


I hate this new normal where we, citizens have to dig internet search to find out about these test. In a better World we could just trust doctors and goverments word about the test.


Every damn thing has to be now rechecked to veryfy is it true or false.

a reply to: Kenzo

You are placing yourself into a position of importance (naturally) but the fact is you don't matter that much.

The failure rate is enough to say you're a risk regardless. That's why it's easier to keep people in doors. All in all are you that important that society can not do without you for 2 weeks??

No?

Then a 1% failure rate is as insignificant as you are.

A positive test isn't an end of your life. Just an end to your next 2 weeks of activity. Again with a little bit of judgement on my part, I highly doubt your absence will be missed in the grand scheme of things.

a reply to: RAY1990

Failure rate ? 1% ?? I think you dont know what you are talking.

This isn't just about 2 Week, they are continuing the lockdowns using this fake test , lockdown 1 .2. 3. 4. etc...until the economy sack out . Flattening the curve mean flattening the economy.


This isn't about just me....look around whole World is suffering from this hoax

originally posted by: kwakakev
I have heard of a lot of reports that the inventor of this kit said it should not be used for large scale testing like what it has been. He was from Europe and died about a year ago.

A couple of problems i see with it.

1/ It only samples a small part of a specific genetic sequence. With all kinds of biological matter around there is a risk of false positives due to other sources.

2/ Each replication process does have an error rate. As trace amounts of genetic material gets further magnified there is a risk of garbage results.

Good to hear the FDA doing something right if they never approved this kind of testing.

Yes it only detects between 75 and 80 percent. And actuslly has a huge error rate on day one of your infection 38% to 67%.

Day 2 18% to 65% false positives

Day 3 12% to 30% false positives

Day4 through 8 remain between 12% to 30%

Day 9 goes to 13% to 31% false positives

So as you can see the test itself has a considerable false positive. So when you see the number of new cases you could safely remove say 20 % to 25 %.

a reply to: Kenzo

It's a real virus with real consequences.

Their may be conspiracies linked with it, actually I know there is. But you claiming it's a fake virus and the tests are fake and the death numbers are fake and fake fake fake hoax isn't exactly constructive.

Or necessarily true.

This isn't about just me....look around whole World is suffering from this hoax

It isn't?

So would you advise my near 90 year old grandad with diabetes to live his life normally because it's all fake?

Will you advice my brother who works night shifts to ignore symptoms and spread it around the public transport system? That's how I caught it.

I understand the detrimental effects of this virus very well. Do you?

I agree the lockdowns are ridiculous. What's more ridiculous is the lack of common sense on the individual's part. It's a real virus. Ignorance is getting people killed.

a reply to: RAY1990

Like we never before had people dieing for respiratory system problems ? Last time i checked every Year quite a lot people die for flu. And older people are in more risk...it`s not my fault .

I had myself bad infection in lungs years ago, i was over a Week in hospital because of it, so i think i know detrimental effects.

This all covid is not about saving people, but to enslave whole World in to Tyranny ...they dont care my or your health one cent....they enjoy if we die right now here.

I think the lockdows are really bad for older people in many ways....they dont see enough other humans, not enough movement..There are old people dying alone out there because of this bs since goverments want to limit contacts .


My own mother suffered from the lockdowns, so i have first hand knowledge that the lockdowns have also bad effects.

a reply to: Kenzo

Human beings have a history with flu.

We do not with corona viruses. Some of the deadliest viruses are cross species virus.

This virus doesn't just target the respiratory system.

It doesn't just affect the old.

And ffs it isn't the flu lmao.

How is this ushering in a new age of tyranny anyways? I'm a reasonable person so convince me. Btw real tyrants kill you if you don't play ball, they don't scare people with apparent make believe viruses.

a reply to: RAY1990


The CDC Says the virus Isn’t Available



The Smoking Gun: Where Is the Coronavirus? The CDC Says It Isn’t Available.




We should focus now to try find the virus

a reply to: Kenzo


This is what happens when someone undereducated attempts to read a medical paper they get it wrong. in verology they wil have kits used to aid detection of a virus. They are called plaque kits and what they are is diffrent cncentrations of the virus vs healthy cells. They do this by separating the virus and the healthy cells with a gel on the plate. so in our kit we can have 10 percent to 95 percent virus on a plate. These are used to see how much of the virus has to be present to be detected.

With all the work being done the cdc simply ran out of the test kits they take time to make. Instead of waiting the people doing the study just decided to suspend the virus in a solution and and use that for their detection processs instead.

In other words has nothing to do with isolating the virus this person believes they are qualified to to read and comprehend the paper its obviously beyond her skill set. Obviously that had the virus because they put it in a suspension for testing !!!!!!

a reply to: Kenzo

Sounds like a military bio weapon !!! 👁️🚬👁️

a reply to: dragonridr


Well the story actually goes from longer than the charlie delta charlie document , it was never even been isolated in scientific way...they just claim it has been, but people on the field know it`s not true. So in the end, they dont even have it...


I doubt Jon Rappoport would write bs..

COVID: The Virus That Isn’t There: The Root Fraud Exposed

a reply to: Kenzo

He also claims Aids does not exist and was made up by drug manufacturers. Hes also claimed the oklahoma city bombing was the FBI and the truck could not have caused the damage to the federal building.He wrote a book on the New World Order claiming they are trying to take over the planet and appaently thinks muslims and christians are working together.

Then he doesnt believe in germs thinks vaccines are being used to damage peoples immune systems. That viruses and germs only make us sick because we have weakened are immune response. Hes crazy and just denies 100 years of science.