It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I have been purchasing a little silver for cash every month at a antique dealer/pawn shop. The manager has come to know me & she gives me a good deal because of my consistent buying. I can probably get a little better deal if I bought physical silver online but the way I am doing it I support a local business and there is no record, something to consider if possessing precious metals is outlawed. The Comex moved enough “silver in a day that is mined in a year; I wouldn’t trust silver certificates. I recently worked a ton of O.T. Think I,ll ramp up my buying a bit.
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
I´ve been following the trend of the last year of buying gold and selling dollars.
I'm curious, what if there's a global economic collapse, how long would it take to get your hands on your gold? I'm being serious because I wouldn't mind buying some but having a certificate or some piece of paper isn't going to get me far.
You should probably register yourself now at a gold ETF dealer because KYC requirements take weeks, and if "everyone" starts registering it will take even longer. If you buy gold bullions from a dealer with a physical shop then you can probably do that in a day, never tried though.
-MM
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Why would anyone want the economy to fail.
originally posted by: rickymouse
The rich people who own big businesses here should probably cash out and take their money to a neutral country somewhere that has no chaos going on. I wonder what country would be the best to move to. Maybe with my measly retirement savings I could move there and pump gas to survive.
originally posted by: elysiumfire
Nothin:
a reply to: elysiumfire. "So what happened, between now, and when you posted this : ATS : David Icke Brings A Little Clarity - But you already know it?"
I posted the video because of parts of what he has always stated regarding globalism which resonated with my own thinking. Globalists causing chaos to bring about their own particular vision of how societies and the world in general ought to be. A lot of what Icke has also stated I cannot reconcile with, and I don't attempt to do so. In the video, I think he explains the intent of the globalists quite succinctly, but it doesn't take an Icke for us to see it.
This 'great reset' is not for the benefit of humanity.
Actually, it is. Just not for all humanity. It is for the benefit of a small section of it in each country, the rest will be culled, and the reasons why I have already outlined in my earlier post. In simple, logical utility, we have to reduce our population numbers, because our planet does not have the extractable resources for us to continue to live in the way we do. One way or another, either nature herself, or we ourselves will force us to 'reset' our mindsets towards the level of lifestyle we enjoy. We have to return to a more commonsense agrarian mode of living, highly managed, and highly controlled, that is if you want our species to survive. We are at the point, or fast approaching it, where our species has to pay the piper. The reset isn't just in financial terms, that is just one aspect, it is more about our societies, the size of them, their diversity, and how the people will be allowed to live.
They are the problem...not us...
No. We must include all of ourselves as part of the problem. We want the same as 'they' have, a quality of life that probably exceeds our grasp. We all have a carbon footprint, just as much as they do. We share in the spoils of our technological victories, and as long as all the pollution and toxins we create for our lifestyles are not seen, we go along with the whole charade. No. We are to blame just as much as they are, after all, it is we who buy their products, which took a lot of resources to create, and on our resource finite planet, it is obvious we are going to hit a point where the resources will no longer meet our needs...that is, without taking extreme and very radical action. The globalists believe we are close to that point, and intend on saving themselves and those who can prop them up with their knowledge and skill sets.
I was born in 1960. At that time there were approximately 3 billion people alive on the planet. Today, just 60 years later, our human population has grown to 7.8 billion, all clamouring for a higher level of life style and quality of life, which our planet cannot provide for. Globalists have taken it upon themselves to do something about it, through nicely titled programs with noble intentions.
Sustainable and harmonious ways of living with the planet. What they don't tell you is that it can only be achieved by reducing population in vast numbers. Reducing down to 500 million globally might be an arbitrary number, but it is being used as a working idea, give or take a few million.