It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
It's hard to believe a submarine hit the ship.
Despite the break-up of the Soviet Union, and the end of the cold war, the west still kept a close eye on Russian military capability, particularly its missile technology. (Of course Russia still had, and has, thousands of nuclear weapons.) One such smuggled shipment, of electronic guidance systems for missiles, had been on the Estonia when it sank. MI6 had been involved in the smuggling operation.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Bluntone22
It's hard to believe a submarine hit the ship.
Pictures of the wreck's hull would clear this up.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Bluntone22
It's hard to believe a submarine hit the ship.
Pictures of the wreck's hull would clear this up.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
It's hard to believe a submarine hit the ship.
The seas were very rough when this happened and a submarine wouldn't likely be that close to the surface because it would be hard to control.
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
You can watch it (behind the paywall)...
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
I doubt a military submarine would make a hole as small as 4 meters (13 feet) in diameter, it would have been a lot bigger imo.
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
It's hard to believe a submarine hit the ship.
The seas were very rough when this happened and a submarine wouldn't likely be that close to the surface because it would be hard to control.
I doubt a military submarine would make a hole as small as 4 meters (13 feet) in diameter, it would have been a lot bigger imo. Submarines are often 3-4 times as wide as that.
-MM
originally posted by: kamatty
From Wikipedia....
Citing the practical difficulties and the moral implications of raising decaying bodies from the sea floor (the majority of the bodies were never recovered), and fearing the financial burden of lifting the entire hull to the surface and the salvage operation, the Swedish government suggested burying the whole ship in situ with a shell of concrete.[33][34] As a preliminary step, thousands of tons of pebbles were dropped on the site.[32] The Estonia Agreement 1995, a treaty among Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Poland, Denmark, Russia and the United Kingdom, declared sanctity over the site, prohibiting their citizens from even approaching the wreck.[35] The treaty is, however, only binding for citizens of the countries that are signatories. At least twice, the Swedish Navy has discovered diving operations at the wreck. The wreck is monitored by radar by the Finnish Navy.[36]
That definitely sounds like they (literally) tried to cover something up
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AaarghZombies
Shrugs?