It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Another loss in court for Schindlers
A state appeals court refused to block the removal of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube Wednesday.
The Second District Court of Appeal in Lakeland turned down the requests of Schiavo's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, on two key issues.
The court refused to overrule Pinellas Circuit Court Judge George Greer's denial of a stay while the Schindlers pursue further appeals in the case.
Originally posted by Gazrok
If not for carrying out her wishes, what other reason
would he have to NOT get a divorce?
Originally posted by Gazrok
4. She's been in this state for around 15 years, she ain't coming out of it folks (which pretty much kills the "but she'll wake up and tell of abuse, etc." argument....there is no such chance of that happening).
Originally posted by negativenihil
That really has to be one of the worst ways to go
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Read the story I linked.
...that the execution sought by her husband Michael Schiavo is anything but painless and humane.
Originally posted by negativenihil
...that the execution sought by her husband Michael Schiavo is anything but painless and humane.
If this woman must die, can we not offer her a painless death?
**Exclusive Fri Mar 18 2005 00:50:07 ET** The Chairman of the Health, Education, Labor, and Pension (HELP) Committee, Mike Enzi (R-Wyoming) has requested Terri Schiavo to testify before his congressional committee, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned. In so doing it triggers legal or statutory protections for the witness, among those protections is that nothing can be done to cause harm or death to this individual.
REALLY- Does Terry want to die?
**Exclusive Fri Mar 18 2005 00:50:07 ET** The Chairman of the Health, Education, Labor, and Pension (HELP) Committee, Mike Enzi (R-Wyoming) has requested Terri Schiavo to testify before his congressional committee, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned. In so doing it triggers legal or statutory protections for the witness, among those protections is that nothing can be done to cause harm or death to this individual.
Originally posted by Gazrok
euthanasia isn't allowed by law (unless you're a pet, then
we're completely humane.. ) So according to the law,
they aren't deciding to kill or not kill her (technically), they
are deciding whether or not to continue artificial support.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
FlyersFan
Once again, how can she feel pain if her nerves aren't functioning?
I keep making the point, you keep ignoring it.
all these things are really none of your concern in my opinion.