Maybe some comparative perspective is needed for COVID

a reply to: ScepticScot

Current data is available that shows a completely different pattern so yes the date is highly relevant.

So much data, showing so many different things. The point is, that is what the data was showing in April. The source is in the pic I posted.

The point is "they" ( the CDC, WHO, etc) are using fuzzy math. They can make the numbers say what they want. I don't see how anyone can not see that.

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
a reply to: ScepticScot

Current data is available that shows a completely different pattern so yes the date is highly relevant.

So much data, showing so many different things. The point is, that is what the data was showing in April. The source is in the pic I posted.

The point is "they" ( the CDC, WHO, etc) are using fuzzy math. They can make the numbers say what they want. I don't see how anyone can not see that.

With data like reported deaths there is going to be a reporting lag.

The fuzziness comes from highly biased sites like the one linked that try an mislead people using that data.

a reply to: ScepticScot

Why did it take so long for this to get reported in the media.

CDC: 94% of Covid-19 deaths had underlying medical conditions

The following are the top underlying medical conditions linked with COVID-19 deaths.

* Influenza and pneumonia

* Respiratory failure

* Hypertensive disease

* Diabetes

* Vascular and unspecified dementia

* Cardiac Arrest

* Heart failure

* Renal failure

* Intentional and unintentional injury, poisoning and other adverse events

* Other medical conditions

The last two are the best.

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
a reply to: ScepticScot

Why did it take so long for this to get reported in the media.

CDC: 94% of Covid-19 deaths had underlying medical conditions

The following are the top underlying medical conditions linked with COVID-19 deaths.

* Influenza and pneumonia

* Respiratory failure

* Hypertensive disease

* Diabetes

* Vascular and unspecified dementia

* Cardiac Arrest

* Heart failure

* Renal failure

* Intentional and unintentional injury, poisoning and other adverse events

* Other medical conditions

The last two are the best.

I am pretty sure that it has been covered extensively that people with underlying conditions are more at risk.

a reply to: ScepticScot

Yea, like "Intentional and unintentional injury, poisoning and other adverse events".

The truth will come out.

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
a reply to: ScepticScot

Yea, like "Intentional and unintentional injury, poisoning and other adverse events".

The truth will come out.

That category includes complications from medical treatment and surgery. Why would that not be listed as a comorbidity?

a reply to: LookingAtMars

This should be it's own thread

a reply to: Blue_Jay33


" Maybe some comparative perspective is needed for COVID "


Yes , like the Fact that the CDC's Own Officially Reported Numbers Calculate that Only about 10,000 People Might have Died as a Direct Result of contracting the Covid-19 Virus here in the United States . The Deliberate Suppression of Information regarding Causes of Death due to Covid-19 are being Manipulated for Political Reasons .

originally posted by: Blue_Jay33

originally posted by: Chance321
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

But your missing one very important factor. This is an election year and Trump is bad. Nothing else worked to get him out so they are trying with this (sic) virus.

Yes I think you might be right, when impeachment failed they cratered the economy with a false narrative, BETA testing the level of control they could achieve on mass populations, and then fed the rioting machine.
Tickets for those that don't social distance and wear a mask, unless you are a rioter that is looting in the street.
Seeds of chaos and injustice to bring down a government.

They began planning this event before Trump was in office.

Ben Swann and Mikki Willis and David Martin have much of this sorted out. Thank goodness for linguistic genomics being put to good use to catch criminals.

www.ise.media...

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

The economic repercussions due to our response will kill many more than the virus ever will. This was never about protecting human life, quite the opposite.