It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source: www.newsobserver.com...
The Trump administration has ended all election security briefings to Congress just weeks before Americans cast their ballots for president, raising concern among lawmakers about the public's right to know about foreign interference in the election.
The nation's top intelligence official, National Intelligence Director John Ratcliffe, told the Senate and House intelligence committees on Friday that the committees would only be receiving written updates about election security to help ensure the information βis not misunderstood nor politicized." The official said there are concerns about unauthorized disclosures of sensitive information following recent briefings on Capitol Hill.
In his letter to the committees, Ratcliffe wrote: βI believe this approach helps ensure, to the maximum extent possible, that the information ODNI provides the Congress in support of your oversight responsibilities on elections security, foreign malign influence, and election interference is not misunderstood nor politicized."
Democrats expressed outrage at the decision by Ratcliffe, who directs the office overseeing the nation's intelligence agencies.
On July 24, 2020, I issued a statement to the American public providing an unclassified overview of foreign threats to the 2020 election and offering basic steps to mitigate some of these threats. At that time, I pledged that the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) would continue to update the American public and other key stakeholders on the evolving election threat landscape, while also safeguarding our intelligence sources and methods.
Today, we are making good on that promise by sharing additional information with the public on the intentions and activities of our adversaries with respect to the 2020 election. This information is being released for the purpose of better informing Americans so they can play a critical role in safeguarding our election. Below is the latest public update:
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust
"Leaks" like saying that Russia favors Trump and that China doesn't?
Was this information classified?
ODNI News Release No. 29-20:
On July 24, 2020, I issued a statement to the American public providing an unclassified overview of foreign threats to the 2020 election and offering basic steps to mitigate some of these threats. At that time, I pledged that the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) would continue to update the American public and other key stakeholders on the evolving election threat landscape, while also safeguarding our intelligence sources and methods.
Today, we are making good on that promise by sharing additional information with the public on the intentions and activities of our adversaries with respect to the 2020 election. This information is being released for the purpose of better informing Americans so they can play a critical role in safeguarding our election. Below is the latest public update:
www.dni.gov... lic
So, that promise is suddenly null and void?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: rickymouse
I believe that, since Congress makes laws, they would be considered to be "key stakeholders" in government activities. Don't you? Do you think whithholding information from one branch of government while providing it to another is a good idea? Is that how the system is set up?
But what "leaks" do you suppose the OP is talking about? Anything come to mind?
There have been lots of leaks from the Democrat party,
twitter.com...
ODNI told congressional officials that it will still provide written briefings on election security, but that they should not expect verbal in-person briefings on the topic, which give members an opportunity to ask questions & challenge briefers
originally posted by: Phage
twitter.com...
ODNI told congressional officials that it will still provide written briefings on election security, but that they should not expect verbal in-person briefings on the topic, which give members an opportunity to ask questions & challenge briefers
How does this prevent leaks of classified information?
Ask me no questions,
I'll tell you no lies?
originally posted by: putnam6
Democrats expressed outrage at the decision... has there been any decision by the current administration that they haven't had the same reaction?
originally posted by: xuenchen
Makes some people think this "interference" may not really be emanating from "foreign" sources.
Perhaps "domestic" *sources* operating on "foreign" soil !! ππ¬
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: rickymouse
I believe that, since Congress makes laws, they would be considered to be "key stakeholders" in government activities. Don't you? Do you think whithholding information from one branch of government while providing it to another is a good idea? Is that how the system is set up?
But what "leaks" do you suppose the OP is talking about? Anything come to mind?
There have been lots of leaks from the Democrat party, in a video Pelosi even brags about it as a political ploy...leak things to the press so they can twist it and make it appear concerning. Then the Dems could use the distorted information to make it appear there is something going on. I wish I had bookmarked her speech on that but it has been here on this site a couple of times.
originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: Phage
The problem is Adam Schiff has on more than a few occasions has told the media that he doesn't leak information, he only exposes it. He's the chairman of the House Intel committee, he shouldn't be doing that. I bet that's where this worry has come from.