Network Edit Oooops - Reveals Anomaly in Space

So I’m bingeing on NASA’s Unexplained Files, on S6E1 (2014 I believe) re-hashing the first segment (the first Chinese astronaut hears unexpected and unexplainable knocking on his spacecraft) I had not viewed previously. I noticed a quick 1/2 sec +/- edit cut ... I framed it back and see what’s pictured below... so quick is the scene, that if you blink, you’ll miss it (you’ll notice also as usual the show inserts it’s template tv static sequence, common for when they insert stock vids or stills)

It’s Unexplainable to me....

My random thoughts? First off an ooops scene inserted but then cut because it was meant to be used on a different episode where it is a focused part of the segment topic being presented. As for the anomaly itself? Fake or real, etc. etc. I’m all eyes as to what others think this is (aside from the comical alien gummy worm, tape worm, rolled out toilet paper etc etc) or already know because exactly what is pictured has already been discussed and I just have not seen what was written about it.


I have scanned the space worms ATS threads...but not found any discussion on this pictured anomaly.

If the cut scene is part of a different episode, let me know what Season and Episode it is, I’d like to see it since I have not come across it yet while bingeing.

Thanx In Advance!




It’s between this scene:




This is the Ooops Edit cut scene:




And this scene....if you see this then you have passed it:

That’s an extrusive stratospheric cloud weasel caught in an orbital vortex created by the center of a hurricane and funneled through our atmosphere by the pull of the moons gravity.

originally posted by: Assassin82
That’s an extrusive stratospheric cloud weasel caught in an orbital vortex created by the center of a hurricane and funneled through our atmosphere by the pull of the moons gravity.

Isn't that just the "Scientific" name of a space worm?

Come on...

originally posted by: Assassin82
That’s an extrusive stratospheric cloud weasel caught in an orbital vortex created by the center of a hurricane and funneled through our atmosphere by the pull of the moons gravity.

Barkeep....I'll have what this guy's having

I know that elsewhere on some Chinese early space footage, a spanner hit the hull, with a clang.

originally posted by: Assassin82
That’s an extrusive stratospheric cloud weasel caught in an orbital vortex created by the center of a hurricane and funneled through our atmosphere by the pull of the moons gravity.

Well, obviously. Duh.

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
Thanx In Advance!

Details? Date/time/camera, etc.

a reply to: Arbitrageur

Details?
We don't need no stinkin' details!

www.jamesoberg.com...

Also Read the end paragraph statement at the very bottom.

I’ll buy that for a dollar....

“On two of my missions, and I still don’t have an answer, I have seen a snake out there six, seven, or eight feet long. It is rubbery because it has internal waves in it, and it follows you for a rather long period of time. The more you fly in space the more you see an incredible amount of things out there, and that sort of thing brings to you, really, a certainty that other living creatures are out there.”

“Details? Date/time/camera, etc.“ .... not happening for shows like NASA’s Unexplained Files and others.... the Details I presented is all you get.

Chalk it up to space worms or lighted and non-lighted space adapted jellyfish! Over the course of millenniums space worms and jellyfish might have evolved in space by who knows what means and adapted to survive and thrive.

Jellyfish already are in a weightlessness environment ...can survive in darkness.... So in space evolving they no longer need tentacles probably propelling by some other form to do so.... I wouldn’t discount space jellyfish.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Musgrave: You see satellites. I've seen Mir go by within 28 miles; other satellites and you don't know what they are, but maybe just space debris. All kinds of debris come off space ships, especially at the back end after the main engines shut down and you open the doors: ice chips, oxygen or hydrogen, stuff dumped from the engines. On two flights I've seen and photographed what I call "the snake," like a seven-foot eel swimming out there. It may be an uncritical rubber seal from the main engines. In zero g it's totally free to maneuver, and it has its own internal waves like it's swimming. All this debris is white, reflecting sunlight, or you don't see it. Cruising along with you at your velocity, it's still got its own rotation. At zero g, things have an incredible freedom. It's an extraordinary ballet.

JM - Have you had any personal experiences with what you would consider an unknown object?
SM - None. And no Astronaut ever has

Yeah...no doubt there is space debris that can account for many sightings of odd shapes and sizes. As you can see, the more junk in space the more we build a sphere of debris to which we can not escape to outer space....We are sealing ourselves in from being able to venture into space. Maybe not in our lifetime but it’s doomed to happen. Sidebar... there was a somewhat funny comedy called Quark about space garbage collecting trash men.

“DescriptionSpace station inhabitants find evil foes when working to clean up garbage in outer space.“ Look up an episode.

How prophetic we may have to seriously consider something like that.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Look up an episode.

Episode of what?

originally posted by: 38181
www.jamesoberg.com...

Also Read the end paragraph statement at the very bottom.

Lost track of which statement, sorry. I'm easily confused.

a reply to: Phage

Episode of what?

Any episode from the one season comedy of space garbage workers looking for and removing space junk. A so call short lived comedy then but not so comedic in real world times as we as a species keep adding to the junk debris in space now with no real solution to eradicate it.....

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
“Details? Date/time/camera, etc.“ .... not happening for shows like NASA’s Unexplained Files and others.... the Details I presented is all you get.

I don't know how you can be expected to follow up on anything without any details.

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

However I can make an observation without any details. Do you notice how it seems to "fade away" near the ends? Can a solid object do that? Not that I know of, so I would think it's not a "non-critical seal" such as Musgrave talked about; I would not expect a seal to "fade away" at the ends like that. Musgrave might have seen some seals or other debris, but I wouldn't expect a seal outside the craft to look like that.

What could give the appearance of "fading away" at the ends like that? If the image was taken through a window, and there was something behind the photographer that was being reflected in the window, where part of it was near a light source, an effect like that could be created where the part closest to the light source has the brightest image (near the center), but further from the light source, it looks more and more like a reflection in a window, where it fades away like a reflection would do.

The 8 foot long space worms don't seem very plausible for numerous reasons in general, but specifically in that image, why would a worm fade away at the ends, like it's a reflection? It would make more sense if it's actually a reflection of something.

Looks like an exhaust cloud from a rocket as filmed from the ISS.

a reply to: JimOberg
Sorry for the confusion, I confuse myself sometimes.

Found the source:

When I was capturing and compiling frames off my mini iPad 4 to put together this thread.... the strangest freaked out occurrence happened that me and wife were bugging out.

So as I do I was screen capturing frames and some for edit sakes I had to crop copy crop etc.

One of the frames that only showed the object with the earth below ... I had to screen capture it itself .... when I did so another object showed up.... at this point I’m telling myself wtf.... so I did it again... I screen captured it itself and that second object did not show up again. I’m thinking was this a iPad picture processing artifact injected by the iPad. Mind you I have no photoshop type apps although I will admit I have photoshop on my main ibm desktop pc.

I showed my wife the screenshot with the second object, she’s a software engineer and was at a lose for words, then she tried being analytical and offered a glitch in what ever type of processing protocol Apple must be using to handle images on the iPad.

Here is the wowzer...... the second object was a black tube...length undetermined or guestamatted by me or my wife. So having said that....I’m hesitant to post it...I know how cruel some members could be on ATS. I find the timing of what I have yet or will yet reveal strange in view of posts mentioning tubes vice my starting the thread with me being clueless of what I had already presented in my first post to start the thread. I’m on the limb not yet fully hanged deciding whether or not to post pictures of object number two.