It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MetalThunder
a reply to: Traptomisprime
Nothing at All
know your legal terms ...
Parsa et al v. Google L.L.C. et al
STAY TUNED
originally posted by: DrumsRfun
a reply to: carewemust
Remember to Star and Flag this thread!
I have yet to see an intelligent post by you that needed responding to.
Only idiots think flags and stars matter.
originally posted by: FlyingFox
a reply to: crankyoldman
...and now ATS is fully funded. No coincidences?
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: MetalThunder
a reply to: Traptomisprime
Nothing at All
know your legal terms ...
Parsa et al v. Google L.L.C. et al
STAY TUNED
So here is something in there important on that docket about the Alphabet Co being sued for the human trafficking in China which is kind of odd to try to sue over China kidnapping people I sure think.
"June 1 2020 Summarily Dismissed. "
That ended on June 1. It was a publicity stunt at this time. I feel for all the plaintiffs and wish them well but they need another angle if they want to win in the end.
A dismissal without prejudice is a dismissal of a legal case that permits the plaintiff to bring the claim again, unlike a dismissal with prejudice, in which the matter is considered final. There are a number of reasons for a case to be dismissed without prejudice, including on the plaintiff's request or because the judge feels that the plaintiff cannot prove the case. For defendants, it is important to be aware that this type of dismissal carries some risks because it leaves them exposed to the possibility that another case will be filed. .....
When a case is dismissed without prejudice because a settlement has been reached, it leaves the possibility of refiling open. This is to the advantage of the plaintiff because it means that, if the other party fails to uphold the terms of the agreement, the plaintiff can bring the case back to court. In this case, the plaintiff would file a motion for a dismissal, which would likely be granted after the reaching of a settlement had been demonstrated.