Was not Joe Biden accused of being a pedophile

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: St0rD

which leads me to think they feel something evil emanating from him.

I was appreciating your point of view until this. Then it became clear that your revulsion to Biden is not based on reality so much but rather based on some kind of absolute good and evil concept. While the children in the video are disturbed by his affection, to count that up to some kind of spiritual force (evil) that they are sensing seems to hint at another undefinable psychic level that in all likelihood is only in your imagination.

Man, you thought through this a little too much.

Evil can have a different meaning than spiritual. I used it here with the intent of saying evil aka bad.

"They felt something bad emenating from him"

a reply to: St0rD

Joe Biden's vice presidential running mate Kamala Harris, says she believes he is a rapist.

What a ticket, eh?

Claims to be "a man of facts".

Then uses phrases like, "Was not Joe Biden a very suspicious possible pedophile and accused sex aggresor?"

How do you even answer your own question?

Yes, Joe Biden was not a very suspicious possible pedophile and accused sex aggressor.

Or.

No, Joe Biden was not a very suspicious possible pedophile and accused sex aggressor.

Yeah, the old man is creepy but take a writing class so you can better develop this man of facts character.

aaaaaaand trump has pics of his TEENAGE daughter sitting on HIS lap and he said and I quote "if she wasn't my daughter I would date her" and he walked into the changing room of the beauty pagent contestants, they were teenagers but he thought he had a right to do that....he not only ran but he won the presidencty...so don't be a hypocrite

originally posted by: St0rD
I'm a man of facts.
In this era of true disinformation I feel like we must look for truths and honor it. In this instance, I find it extremely ironic the mainstream media works so hard to try and elevate the candidate Joe Biden over Donald Trump at any opportunities possible.
Was not Joe Biden a very suspicious possible pedophile and accused sex aggresor?

Have you seen the video where he kiss and hugs little girls from behind in front of their parents who are obviously overwhelmingly umconfortable... both the kid and the parents.

So why is that dude running to be the next President of the United States?

Am I missing something or it just have become normal for our reality to be that #ed up?

Joe biden, the pedophile, and his running mate kamala (who openly states she believes he is a rapist) do not stand a chance this November so, at this point, what does it matter?

Yes, I posted right here on ATS that he was a Pedo. Not that anybody listened to me, but I know they watched the sniff videos I posted, as they were all over Youtube.

This is who the losers will vote for:

www.youtube.com...

a reply to: St0rD

I appreciate your clearing that up for me St. I don't think that they felt anything emanating from him. Rather I think they experienced the actions of another that countered their standards of behavior that they were raised with.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: St0rD

Joe Biden's vice presidential running mate Kamala Harris, says she believes he is a rapist.

What a ticket, eh?

No she doesn't say that. Not even close.

She hasn't said that in the past, and she doesn't say it in the present.

You are twisting her words well towards the threshold of libel.

Tread carefully please.

Isn't it just the standard old cliche of politicians kissing babies and putting on over the top poses for the cameras when running for office?

Never understood it myself but it's used as a PR stunt around the world with the idea being to act as if they care about the future of young generations and will act in the interest of parents. The press love it as the old saying goes 'never work with animals or kids' in media as there's a high chance for disater/bad PR.

Obviously if the politician started french kissing the kid and getting a bulge in their pants that's a lot different than the usual video footage of them awkwardl posing for press photographers.

Have a look on GettyImages - there's a library of photos/videos of over 3,200 politicians from around the world doing the same thing. Here's photos of Trump and past US presidents in awkward photos with kids, doesn't mean there's any evidence they were paedos, just cheap media whores. www.dailymail.co.uk...

originally posted by: bastion
Isn't it just the standard old cliche of politicians kissing babies

No.

Apologists either can't or won't watch the vids...like, the camera doesn't lie. The reactions of the kids tell the tale (and sometimes the body language of the parents.) Joe unfailingly gets grabby, sniffy, or just completely gravitates towards kids to touch them as the world dissolves away around him.

The man is sick, but holds a position of power where no one is willing to stick their neck out to call him out on this.

Why do people defend this behavior? Are you guys just not able to interpret body language and facial expressions?

a reply to: NarcolepticBuddha

Nah, just an ex journalist and PR person - I've never seen any politician not come off as awkward and creepy when doing the poses for the cameras. The standard is posing for 30 seconds to a minute for the photos which is really unnatural and creepy for the kids to go through and shows on video cameras.

The camera always lies, photos are framed, chosen and in often cases set up, orchestrated and stage managed. Even the most famous, award winning press photographs such as Kevin Carters picture "The Struggling Girl" showing baby boy starving to death in the Sudanese famine with a vulture in the background about ready to eat the baby was set up by them picking up and moving the collapsed child closer to the vulture for the shot - they left him to die after they'd taken the photo as they claimed it'd be 'unethical' for them to intervene and break 'journalist neutrality'.

In this case video will show it to be creepy as people have to stand for an unnaturally long time in poses. I've had to pose for the press myself in ceremonies and PR stuff and it's really awkward to pose for that long, it makes people very self-concious until they get used to it.

Editted splices of footage cherry picked from the archives and removed from context don't do much for me; I've yet to see any from the US that haven't been poorly disguised astroturf campaigns from the Republicans or Democrats to prop up the 'Static State' propaganda approach they both spend hundreds of millions on.

There's dozens of videos showing Boris Johnson knocking kids over whe posing for cameras. I could easilly splice them together and claim Boris gets his rocks off beating up kids but it doesn't make it true.

There's ample evidence from former female staff showing he's sexist and has abused his position by obvious flirting with them to the point they've felt so uncomfy they've put in complaints about his unproffesional conduct which isn't the kind of behaviour anyone running for office or influence should have when half the people they're meant to represent are women. It runs completely contrary to his claims he respects them and his previous work in tackling sexual assault/culture of victim blaming but the paedophillia claims are just a groundless reach.

He's completely unaware that what he's doing just looks bad
or even that it could look bad. Keep your hands off the kids
you pig.

They don't want you touch'n 'em. And a probable rapist.

a reply to: St0rD

Its all so passive... everybody knows what is happening, take an other pepsi and bag of popcorn to watch what will happen next...if anything will happen next. Just like the widow of this US senator said...everybody knew about epstein. Can you imagine the scale and infuence these scumbags have in such circles if this scumbag epstein gets a free pass.

An other thing I find hard to understand is that a nation with 300+ million people all these people have to hoose from for their leader are such perverts, murderers and idiots. There must be brilliant and motivated people who can be of value to that great nation. People should ask themselves why this is all happening.

a reply to: St0rD

youtu.be...
Could someone put this vid up for me please, thanks in advance. 🙂

originally posted by: Chance321
So, your in favor of dirty old men sniffing women and children? AS for the "watch dogs"?

What good are women and kids if you can't sniff them?

originally posted by: Gnawledge

originally posted by: St0rD

originally posted by: Gnawledge

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Gnawledge

originally posted by: St0rD

originally posted by: Gnawledge

originally posted by: St0rD

originally posted by: Gnawledge
a reply to: St0rD

Same reason Trump is running.

No one cares how f'ed our leadership is.

"Leadership".

You did. Sorry. Just can't see how anyone can believe anything out of Trump's mouth.

I mean; I would rather have DT than most of the other alternatives.

At least, he makes look like he is fighthing against the machine.
It's almost believable.

You believe him? That's not a jab but, really?

I said,

almost believable.

You did. I just can't see how anyone can believe anything out of Trump's mouth.

Is this thread about Trump ?
Seek help.
Professional help

Ok. But that is how I feel about Trump. That guy needs help.

So do I, I guess. But I'm not a leader of the free world.

ETA: No Thread isn't about Trump. But i'm pretty sure Biden is up his a##. So kinda about Trump.

Trump is more wise than you would like to think.

I feel most of the things he says is just to # around with media and ppl.

Do you really think he genuinely believed that getting a disinfectant IV was a solution against covid? Honest question.

I hope not. But he said it. And he is supposed to be leading us.

This is the problem. He didn’t say that, you’re just to stupid to not believe what the idiots on TV tell you.

Joe Biden will get his, in this life or the next.

a reply to: Robbo2006

Here you go-

originally posted by: underpass61
a reply to: Robbo2006

Here you go-

👍🏼

Does Zenkus have any credibility? He's on proffesorwatch and quackwatch because of his mistaken claims Nazis were a leftwing movement, he's a champagne socialist who complains about capitalism killing millions but doesn't point out globally both Socialism and Communism killed at far higher rates and calls both Trump and Biden rapists with 'credible evidence' for raping people despite none having been produced in court and both Biden and Trumps accusers having failed to mention it mutliple times when testifying under oath.

I've never met a proffesor who calls people rapists when their accusers have testified to the contrary under oath in previous cases or considers people credible when they've changed their story and version of events multiple times; it goes against all academic rigour and libel/defamation law. I wouldn't be suprised if his degree was one he bought online rather than earned through educaton or an actual University.