“Fascists,” he said. “They are fascists.”

Admittedly it is pretty hard to make sense of your word salad, but
I think this is a good example what you like to call
‘He said she said...’

Maybe it’s just me, but everything you tried to convey is bizarro and opposite
to my perceptions. In fact, since most of the replies cited some fine examples of
DNC totalitarianism, I am now having bad flashbacks of how we got here.

Let’s see...it started with a pre-election spy order conducted by obama,
which the media ignored,
one which puts Watergate to shame, followed by a post election coup
which the media ignored
just so they could participate more fully in the coup, for the next three years,
while simultaneously painting Trump as ‘demented’ each time Trump called them out,
followed by a mock pandemic
headed up by a satanic puppet billionaire who wants to dictate terms of normalcy,
or surrender, at the pointed end of a needle, because he has things in the closet....

Suddenly it’s pallets of bricks, federal buildings and police stations on fire,
rioters being set free, jails emptied, mask orders, except for when burning cities,
along with what appears to be acute mass delirium....yes, I can see how you’d feel that it’s all
going too fast and that trump is the blame since it’s on his watch.

All I can see is that he warned us, so you want us, to target him.

Well, you know what they say:
It really helps if you keep your hands busy.
hint: Amazon has some really neat craft supplies and they’ll be delivered before you know it!


# 1142

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

Empty rhetorical platitudes are always right.

They actually seem to be the tools of the trade for the left.

Which appear to always end up being wrong, historically.

For the American average citizen, that is.

I would, as a former Obama voter who did not vote for Trump the last time, like to thank you.

People such as yourself has made me vote for Trump this time.

Just because I can't stand intellectual dishonesty, no matter the political party.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

If you're not for freedom, then what else is there?

Deaf ears and empty platitudes.

That's why we've never agreed on things.

I'll always argue for Constitutional rights and more freedoms. Even on things I don't personally agree with.

I will always be for more freedoms.

Think on that the next time you disagree with me.

LOL

The US Constitution doesn't give you freedom, it limits the government's grasp on your "unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."

I know.

And that's why we never agree, because I'll always argue against government over-reach.

The current goverment is attacking liberals and treating them as they are enemies and that isn't goverment overreach in your opinion.

You're for selective freedom that favours your side.

a reply to: Lumenari

They actually seem to be the tools of the trade for the left.

And, "PROJECTION" is a tool of the corrupt right that Donald Trump wields like his "Roy Cohn" (RIP), to fully exploit for political and financial purposes.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

Empty rhetorical platitudes are always right.

Again, you have nothing to back up your claims, you're even disagreeing with me now.

But all I've ever been for, if for more freedom.

GOD! It must sting to be shown to be anti-freedom.

*shrugs*

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

If you're not for freedom, then what else is there?

Deaf ears and empty platitudes.

That's why we've never agreed on things.

I'll always argue for Constitutional rights and more freedoms. Even on things I don't personally agree with.

I will always be for more freedoms.

Think on that the next time you disagree with me.

LOL

The US Constitution doesn't give you freedom, it limits the government's grasp on your "unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."

I know.

And that's why we never agree, because I'll always argue against government over-reach.

The current goverment is attacking liberals and treating them as they are enemies and that isn't goverment overreach in your opinion.

You're for selective freedom that favours your side.

Nope. You're conflating murderers with actual protesters.

I see a difference, apparently, you do not.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: projectvxn

Truly all those things you point out can and should be considered in that light. However failure to to be just as concerned by the imperial posturing of this president suggests a rather limited ability to discern the entire threat of authoritarianism that we all face.

That word you used there, posturing, I think it's the most important one in the equation. Whatever posturing he does is far less concerning than the evidence we have of actual authoritarian behavior from rioters and the democrat establishment. He is saying it would be rigged, but they have been actively been trying to sabotage their opponent since before he was elected.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Again, you have nothing to back up your claims, you're even disagreeing with me now.

No I'm not. I'm saying that your arguments are empty and cheap.

a reply to: Lumenari

 thank you.

People such as yourself has made me vote for Trump this time.

Really, you choose who you vote for based on others peoples opinions.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

Again, you have nothing to back up your claims, you're even disagreeing with me now.

No I'm not. I'm saying that your arguments are empty and cheap.

*laughs*

It's pretty sad if that's all you have.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

If you're not for freedom, then what else is there?

Deaf ears and empty platitudes.

That's why we've never agreed on things.

I'll always argue for Constitutional rights and more freedoms. Even on things I don't personally agree with.

I will always be for more freedoms.

Think on that the next time you disagree with me.

LOL

The US Constitution doesn't give you freedom, it limits the government's grasp on your "unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."

I know.

And that's why we never agree, because I'll always argue against government over-reach.

The current goverment is attacking liberals and treating them as they are enemies and that isn't goverment overreach in your opinion.

You're for selective freedom that favours your side.

Nope. You're conflating murderers with actual protesters.

I see a difference, apparently, you do not.

We're not talking about protestors, nice try with the red herring though.

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

If you're not for freedom, then what else is there?

Deaf ears and empty platitudes.

That's why we've never agreed on things.

I'll always argue for Constitutional rights and more freedoms. Even on things I don't personally agree with.

I will always be for more freedoms.

Think on that the next time you disagree with me.

LOL

The US Constitution doesn't give you freedom, it limits the government's grasp on your "unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."

I know.

And that's why we never agree, because I'll always argue against government over-reach.

The current goverment is attacking liberals and treating them as they are enemies and that isn't goverment overreach in your opinion.

You're for selective freedom that favours your side.

The current government is pointing out that the Democratic party can rather easily be classified at this point as Enemies of the State.

You are OK with that though because Orange Man bad and BAMN.

YOU are for a tyrannical government.

You are, by definition, an enemy of our Constitution and the United States of America.

You also have the right to express your opinions BECAUSE of that very document and government that you now are fighting against.

Government over-reach would be you being silenced and not allowed to spew your anti-American viewpoints.

You know... like leftist-run media does to conservatives ALL THE TIME.

So who is for selective freedom again?

a reply to: DBCowboy

LOL

All you have is your cry for freedom.

But all I've ever been for, if for more freedom.

GOD! It must sting to be shown to be anti-freedom.

*shrugs*

So, you want to defund the prisons?

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

If you're not for freedom, then what else is there?

Deaf ears and empty platitudes.

That's why we've never agreed on things.

I'll always argue for Constitutional rights and more freedoms. Even on things I don't personally agree with.

I will always be for more freedoms.

Think on that the next time you disagree with me.

LOL

The US Constitution doesn't give you freedom, it limits the government's grasp on your "unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."

I know.

And that's why we never agree, because I'll always argue against government over-reach.

The current goverment is attacking liberals and treating them as they are enemies and that isn't goverment overreach in your opinion.

You're for selective freedom that favours your side.

Nope. You're conflating murderers with actual protesters.

I see a difference, apparently, you do not.

We're not talking about protestors, nice try with the red herring though.

*laughs*

You already (previously) stated that you just troll and disagree to be disagreeable.

You're apparent stances have no merit with me.

*shrugs*

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

LOL

All you have is your cry for freedom.

But all I've ever been for, if for more freedom.

GOD! It must sting to be shown to be anti-freedom.

*shrugs*

So, you want to defund the prisons?

Yes.

All I have is my cry for freedom that you are now mocking.

Thank you for proving my point.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Excellent note Mr. Below. Calling ''fascist'' is counter productive because it uses an out moated label that defined an example of authoritarianism from almost a century ago. It does however have an appeal to people who have little grasp on the nature of authoritarianism as we are faced with it now.

Agreed it appeals to the same people who think racism is still a thing in 2020.

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Lumenari

 thank you.

People such as yourself has made me vote for Trump this time.

Really, you choose who you vote for based on others peoples opinions.

I choose who I vote for based off of how much freedom I am going to gain or lose, be it financially or privately.

Based on the Democratic party's useless eater voting base and their opinions, I have a pretty good idea I would be screwed if I voted for Biden.

Thinking for yourself and your own life and lifestyle.

You should try it sometime.

Not that we are in any danger of THAT happening....

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Seriously?

Are we in pretend land where the media and Hollywood and athletes and businesses haven't waged a hour by hour onslaught of literal crap flinging?

I mean its all a chitshow but to show outrage from a "side" is utterly preposterous.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Yeah, I'm mocking you. Poor you, with no freedom. Boo effing hoo to you!

How about you start addressing "liberty" and what that stands for, instead of vapid and hypocritical cries for "freedom"?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Lumenari

They actually seem to be the tools of the trade for the left.

And, "PROJECTION" is a tool of the corrupt right that Donald Trump wields like his "Roy Cohn" (RIP), to fully exploit for political and financial purposes.

You really need to get better at this "debate" thing.

All the left and Progressives have had to work with for decades is projection.

Ask FDR.

Or take a look at your party's REAL history.

You know, the ones that cozied up to Hitler and called Stalin "Uncle Joe."

I have watched for the past almost 4 years the left projecting EVERYTHING they are guilty of themselves being projected on Trump.

Working with Russia/Ukraine?

Check.

Blatant racism?

Check.

Misogynist?

Check.

Friends of the CCP, Kim and Iran?

Check.

Blatant voter fraud?

Check.

Not accepting the results of an election?

Check.

So you and your cats can keep discussing with each other how bad Trump is.

I'm going to do my damnedest on the local front to get him re-elected.

Simply because "your side" can't even support your own freaking candidate or say what his polities are going to be (although Bernie has already told us) but it's just a vote against Trump.

Not a vote "for" anything.

Because you and your party have nothing good to bring to the table.

Just insanity and economic slavery.