It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tucket
Not interested, though prolly not much of a choice when Trump said the Military will be involved in administering the vaccines.
originally posted by: Michigan72
Let's say vaccines started becoming available in a few months. What's your game plan?
I don't think i could bring myself to get one. It's not that I'm anti-vaccine. It's just a matter of ethics. As a Catholic, I cannot support a company who obtained that vaccine by experimenting on fetal tissue.
originally posted by: Michigan72
Let's say vaccines started becoming available in a few months. What's your game plan?
I don't think i could bring myself to get one. It's not that I'm anti-vaccine. It's just a matter of ethics. As a Catholic, I cannot support a company who obtained that vaccine by experimenting on fetal tissue.
Let me repeat for emphasis. The investigators think that what they found is that vaccines are contaminated with all sorts of inorganic metals. What they really found is that the amount of inorganic contamination is so low as to be biologically irrelevant. In fact, what they found is that vaccines are incredibly pure products.
Yes, laugh, because what Gatti and Montanari actually showed is that the level of inorganic contamination in vaccines is minuscule, suggesting that the manufacturing processes used to make them are very, very good at making sure that vaccines are pure, given that none of the vaccines contained more inorganic particles at a concentration higher than 0.15 femtomolar.
That’s because it’s all about antivaccine fear mongering, not science.
The International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination charges authors of research papers from $589 to $989 to publish. So let’s be honest – are the “peer reviewers” actually going to reject a paper and forgo the publishing fee? This is why predatory publishers are under such scrutiny for the quality of their research.
originally posted by: Nyiah
Abso-#ing-lutely not. If others want to be guinea pigs for the long-term unknowns, far be it from me to tell them not to, but I'm sure as hell not going with that gamble.
Talk to me in 15 or 20 years when we know what the real health fallout from a rushed vaccine is or isn't. I might consider it at that point in time. Or not.