Are we prepared to accept Chinese communist rulership of the world (or the fascist NWO)..?

a reply to: PhilbertDezineck

Fascism is where the state directs the economy, not where it actually owns the businesses. Plus there's a lot more to it. China is more Neo-Maoist.

a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

This skit says it well, we're already slaves believing in the illusion of choice.

a reply to: okrian

I think the pixelated porn is Japanese style.

So You give us one of two choises!
you are pushing fascist NWO.

We can fiight both. and chose freedom.
the Top rich are the enemy.

like US it is supost to be a democracy.
but it is not. it is a rule of the top rich.
big companies control it all.
and they take out small companies.

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

Life will be better under Chinese rulership if Americans make the big mistake of electing Joe Biden as our president.

Its not hard to see the way this thread is intended to go...pffff!

The User has a point, Biden is compromised by the chinese, via his son.
We don't want that now.

a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

I believe the trick here is to understand that regardless of who is looking to assert authoritarianism.. It will always eventually lead to infrastructure being used to ensure compliance.

Control of media will control the response of "normies" to everything going on, and thats a real problem. Particularly when we see so many not look at actual source footage. 99.9% of the information that many receive is filtered through a third party with an agenda.

Historically, the means for power structures to exert their will over widespread portions of the population is pretty standard. Control basic needs, which I believe are best perceived in context of the technology of the time, and people can be forced to comply. Precede the real power push by massive propaganda campaigns, and people become convinced its "for the greater good."

For the first time, IMO, we actually have the means to prevent this and build an infrastructure that can not be used to achieve totalitarianism. Without that competing infrastructure, its a substantially different situation.

Itd be like one nation entering conflict with another, and one doesnt have the ability to provide truthful information channels, manufacture items, grow their own food, provide medicine, or create their own energy. Whats going to happen?

The difference now, from how this seemingly endless cycle keeps playing out, is that the "nations" now in conflict dont necessarily have borders. Thats a pretty unique factor. "You" may not think that that grocery store chain down the street is part of the technocratic nation, but the businesses that arent are being squeezed out of the market.

A competing infrastructure must be built, and modern technology enables us to do this. Widespread adoption of decentralized self-sufficiency not only builds an infrastructure that can meaningfully put up a fight against the technocratic Monolith nation, it can build the foundation for an entirely different approach to basic needs and modern tech, everywhere.

Self-sufficiency & autonomy using cutting edge tech and clever thinking is the absolute biggest threat to a technocrat nation that derives its power from centralized dependency of information, medicine, food, etc. Particularly when it can spread worldwide so quickly.

a reply to: Arnie123

absolutely , china is not going to rule squat

This would be a good time for a EMT.....just send us back to the stone age.

a reply to: FlyInTheOintment We will inherit their social rating and compliance of everything else,laws

originally posted by: okrian

But, in your doomy situation, I'm most concerned with my porn becoming pixelated where the private parts are. That's no way to live. Keep porn free and pixel free!

FINALLY! Common ground.

Time to convert and declare a Jihad.


Yeah yeah I know China ain't a lost territory but if you think about we are all on ancient Chinese ancestral land.