Was Americas Frontline Doctors a PR Smear Against Hydroxychloroquine

I was really impressed by the video that went around with this group's protest, it was intense. But I had my suspicions before the character assassination on the featured doctor of that video started on the MSM. That then became a weapon to not only discredit the hydroxy treatment, but the president as well.

I can't help but believe that this was all a set up, designed to be used as a PR weapon. Now, if you reference the new Yale study supporting the hydroxy treatment, social media censors it as fake news. The Americas Frontline Doctors website was shut down by their host provider just recently, but I looked it over and it seemed very questionable when I looked at it.

I've had a number of questions about this group, like why was their website a .com rather than a .org? Why wasn't the website created at the start of the pandemic? Why was there so little information about their organization on their website? How could they have allowed this "doctor" to make her speech knowing she had skeletons in her voodoo closet? Why did their website disappear so quickly?

It had to be an elaborate ruse to snare President Trump and discredit the hydroxy treatment.

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
I was really impressed by the video that went around with this group's protest, it was intense. But I had my suspicions before the character assassination on the featured doctor of that video started on the MSM. That then became a weapon to not only discredit the hydroxy treatment, but the president as well.

I can't help but believe that this was all a set up, designed to be used as a PR weapon. Now, if you reference the new Yale study supporting the hydroxy treatment, social media censors it as fake news. The Americas Frontline Doctors website was shut down by their host provider just recently, but I looked it over and it seemed very questionable when I looked at it.

I've had a number of questions about this group, like why was their website a .com rather than a .org? Why wasn't the website created at the start of the pandemic? Why was there so little information about their organization on their website? How could they have allowed this "doctor" to make her speech knowing she had skeletons in her voodoo closet? Why did their website disappear so quickly?

It had to be an elaborate ruse to snare President Trump and discredit the hydroxy treatment.

Possible I suppose but doubtful I pulled up some of the other MD's and speakers behind her. The are real doctors with real practices can't see them putting thier reputations on the line. Not to mention certain members also had conservative leanings. If it is a scam or con job they back themselves up well. I think they believe what they are saying and you know what it might be true, but we won't find out for years if ever.

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
It had to be an elaborate ruse to snare President Trump and discredit the hydroxy treatment.

Are you saying someone out 4D chess played Donald J. Trump who admittedly is the smartest and best President ever?

Not possible.

The FDA is trying to force some treatments while denying othere. There are a lot of people trying to make money form the covid vaccine, even though there has never been one developed for a corona virus. Money and Trump, ether or both could be the reason.

originally posted by: beyondknowledge
The FDA is trying to force some treatments while denying othere. There are a lot of people trying to make money form the covid vaccine, even though there has never been one developed for a corona virus. Money and Trump, ether or both could be the reason.

TPTB behind vaccine push are definitely all in now, there is no going back, no revisions now, they will look like asses and lose millions if not more. Their motivation or reasons behind it, greed or incompetence likely a little bit of both

Dr. Stella Immanuel characterization aka Drum’s law

a reply to: Fallingdown

well she is a nut of the highest order.

Ummm. Most people wouldn't have even have paid attention to them until the President and his son tweeted about them. If either one had spent 5 minutes prior to tweeting to check into the people, I mean Dr Immanuels videos are very accessible, or if he listened to their claims of being able to CURE everyone, then they hopefully would not have tweeted it and it wouldn't have been picked up so massively.

Now if the media planted it and you knowingly admit the President is not bright enough to possibly verify info before tweeting it, then ok yes I may agree with you.

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

Why does the domain suffix indicate anything to you? jIt could be a .com, .biz , .org , .edu or multiple others. Plenty of benign reasons why they chose .org.


Which part is the character assassination?

Is it when she claims " that gynecological problems like cysts and endometriosis are in fact caused by people having sex in their dreams with demons and witches. "

Or maybe it was this "She alleges alien DNA is currently used in medical treatments, and that scientists are cooking up a vaccine to prevent people from being religious. "

Nope , it had to be this "And, despite appearing in Washington, D.C. to lobby Congress on Monday, she has said that the government is run in part not by humans but by “reptilians” and other aliens."

a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

I think this person was just crazy. Not a real doctor.


I think the trump admin is desperate to get a doctor as the face for what they think is right.
I think they didn't vet this person because of that desperation.

Nothing in all this explains the pull-out-all-the-stops effort to silence these doctors and erase anything they say, including the deplatforming of their website. It's not like they are recommending some untested highly dangerous or most likely fatal treatment. They aren't doing anything but saying their findings confirm what some other researchers have been saying. HCQ has a long record of safe and effective use and is one of the most benign medications out there. This over the top reaction raises more questions than than the claims these doctors make. Can anyone explain why suppression is necessary?

And yes, keep hyper focusing on one doctor on the panel's cringy religious beliefs - that apparently discounts the rest of them and their highly respectable credentials.

a reply to: underpass61

Pull out all the stops? It literally took less than 2 minutes to find out about Dr Immanuel's demon sperm claim. She claimed she can cure COVID in every patient in the original video. You really think every case can be cured? The original video throws red flags, it doesn't need to have all the stops pulled out

Feel free to browse the other threads about these doctors including her and the eye doctor who is somehow an infectious disease specialist apparently.

If these doctors had not vetted Dr Immanuel and stood with her in support, letting her make the cure claim then there is an issue with all of them. If they were not smart enough to have vetted her, then they are not smart enough to believe.

Why is this so difficult to comprehend. This is not about whether hydroxychloroquine may help. There is no cure as is claimed and these doctors should not be promoted by the President as he did. Although now he claims he didn't know about Dr. Immanuel.

a reply to: frogs453

Yes, why pull out all the stops by removing their press conference from FB, Twitter,etc. and pulling it down every time it gets reposted? I actually mentioned the hyperfocus being put on Dr. Immanuel. The point being character assassination of her is the the sole focus of conversation, not anything the panel of doctors discussed.

Why is this so difficult to comprehend?

a reply to: underpass61

Removed because there is not a cure for all cases as claimed in the video. They pulled the video from some group that claimed some liquid they were selling could cure it. They arrested a doctor in my state giving out some treatment he claimed could cure it. Why do you want people who may not be able to research the claims or the people making the claims to believe there is a cure? Of course take down the videos as there is no cure.

She spoke for the group. She claimed she can cure COVID. Of course she is more outrageous and less qualified than the other doctors. Please peruse some other threads here on this very same issue to see their less than steller qualifications as well.

The President should never have tweeted about a cure without vetting the information. All of the doctors should have been vetted. Heck they just created their website 12 days prior to releasing the video. It seems like a group got together, made some not completely valid claims and expected the world to believe them.

I will say again I'm not saying hydroxychloroquine may not be of some use. The Doctor claims she can cure COVID.

originally posted by: Fallingdown
Dr. Stella Immanuel characterization aka Drum’s law

In scholarly circles, "nutpicking" is called the weak-man fallacy

Well, that seems to have worked in this case, all too well I'm afraid. All part of the plan it seems.

originally posted by: opethPA
a reply to: MichiganSwampBuck

Why does the domain suffix indicate anything to you? jIt could be a .com, .biz , .org , .edu or multiple others. Plenty of benign reasons why they chose .org.

Actually they chose .com, a company, not an organization or network. If they were truly legit, I think they wouldn't have made it a .com in my opinion.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: underpass61
Why is this so difficult to comprehend. This is not about whether hydroxychloroquine may help. There is no cure as is claimed and these doctors should not be promoted by the President as he did. Although now he claims he didn't know about Dr. Immanuel.

Let's not forget she is a Pediatrician which in the Video children are not at risk so her so called "300" patients are children she treated with a bit of frog skin and sage, but they survived so there is that PROOF! hahaha!

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: underpass61

Removed because there is not a cure for all cases as claimed in the video. They pulled the video from some group that claimed some liquid they were selling could cure it. They arrested a doctor in my state giving out some treatment he claimed could cure it. Why do you want people who may not be able to research the claims or the people making the claims to believe there is a cure? Of course take down the videos as there is no cure.

She spoke for the group. She claimed she can cure COVID. Of course she is more outrageous and less qualified than the other doctors. Please peruse some other threads here on this very same issue to see their less than steller qualifications as well.

The President should never have tweeted about a cure without vetting the information. All of the doctors should have been vetted. Heck they just created their website 12 days prior to releasing the video. It seems like a group got together, made some not completely valid claims and expected the world to believe them.

I will say again I'm not saying hydroxychloroquine may not be of some use. The Doctor claims she can cure COVID.

There was a doctor in canada curing cancer with cannabis and the DEA crossed borders to arrest him.

The same doctor that cured Tommy Chong's cancer in fact.

originally posted by: Flesh699
There was a doctor in canada curing cancer with cannabis and the DEA crossed borders to arrest him.

Sure there was.

a reply to: frogs453

So the public cannot be trusted to evaluate their claims for themselves and therefore they must be censored and oppressed, even though their recommendation carries about the same risk as taking ibuprofen. It's true the public is getting dumber every day but freedom of choice used to be a thing.

Freedom of choice Is what you got
Freedom from choice Is what you want

DEVO