It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpittinCobra
I think if you can afford to give that to your kids then good for you.
I dont know how many families can give thier kids 100 a week.
Originally posted by SpittinCobra
It really is alot, at 100 bucks a week. Its 5 grand a year 1/8 of an average income family's income a year.
Thats with only one kid!
[edit on 15-3-2005 by SpittinCobra]
Originally posted by sen5e
Hey Ocelot, you were worth $100 per week easy.
Originally posted by Jonna
Perhaps an unpopular view, but shouldn't children 'help out' the family because they are apart of it and not for monitary value? I know that kids need money, but should it really be considered a 'chore' to be a contributing member of the family.
My problem is the questionible ethics that this creates in the child's development.
Originally posted by sen5e
I understand where you're coming from but I think the purpose here is to acclimatize kids to the real world ahead of time in a relatively simple & easy way.
Originally posted by Jonna
Don't get me wrong as I agree with you. I am simply pondering the cost to traditional 'family' life. We (in America) are raised to thrive in an enviornment of capitalizm. However on the path to that it seems that the closeness of the family group is lessening. Is it worth it? That is all I am posing.
Originally posted by BaastetNoir
hey i did shores and HAD NO allowance...kids are spoilled today... you goota do stuff at home, not just sit around all day playing video games... i didnt die for not getting allowance...in fact it only made me be more thankfull for my money when i got a job ...