Another case for assistance

Hey guys,
Take. Look at this video.
It's not the best quality, nor does dude hold it on the object the entire time lol, but it came in yesterday and I'm lookin to see if anyone else has seen something similar.
Watch the entire video.
Not just the first flashes, but the figure 8 type motions.

First video
Link to video

Second video

Link to 2nd video

UFO videos are pretty much pointless these days.

Anyone can take a view and manipulate it to make a pretty convincing UFO videos.

Just like anyone can make a recording of a drone flying and claim its a UFO.

There are just so many possibilities these days as to what that might be recording before we jump to ET paying us a visit that these kind of videos are now pretty much useless and mean absolutely nothing.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Does that mean you have no opinion or suggestion as to what the object could be?

A bit more background.

Shot at 10:47 pm, July 20, 2020, in Virden Manitoba, Canada.
Witnesses facing the North East.

2 original witnesses, first noticed it while on the porch having a cigarette.
One of them went in the house and woke up a 3rd witness to the event.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

I agree. We need something very big. Not that I don't already know they are here but we are gonna need something huge to wake the masses.

"That is super weird" I agree.It does not seem to move like a drone at all. a reply to: Macenroe82

a reply to: Macenroe82

It means that I could be absolutely anything before we jump to UFO.

It could be doctored, it could be a drone, atmospheric anomaly, could just be someone messing about with lights, could be something wrong with the camera...the list goes on.

I had a experience a few years ago where on a pitch black night I saw massive lights suddenly explode in the sky, just those two huge bright lights sining in the sky. Turned out a football stadium 20 miles away was testing its new flood lighting system and it created the lights.

in 2020, a video of something in the sky means nothing.

More solid proof is required from the likes of SETI, accounts form pilots, Radar, astronauts, military accounts, mass sightings and so on. A video of "hey look at this funny light in the sky" means sweet F.A, if you showed me this in the 1980's I might have been getting my tin foil hat out but 40 years later, a video means nothing.

Its a big problem in Ufology, the videos that flood the internet are so numerous and almost all of them have a more earthly explanation that the subject is dying out and anything real just gets lost in the masses of rubbish.

Just my opinion.

If you think you've just discovered proof of ET then tweet it to NASA and let them know they can call off the search because you've found him.

This is the first video I have ever seen that looked like this. (I have watched thousands of them) A white RGB LASER shined at the clouds could do that effect, but that doesn't mean that is what it is.

Not sure what to think it might be. IF it is something very exotic up there it is a very rare catch.

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

I agree. We need something very big. Not that I don't already know they are here but we are gonna need something huge to wake the masses.

Exactly, I do believe in Aliens, I even believe we have been visited in our distant past but I think that actual proof of ET is going need to be something massive.

a reply to: bluemooone2

Exactly.
But It did remind me of how an RC heli moves when trick flying in 3D.

This was observed for close to 30 minutes from when it was first noticed by the witnesses.
Those types of manoeuvres, plus the speed of which, would be draining on any modern RC lith-ion battery.
they claim it was in the clouds and When it left, it went up, rather than descend.

I have a 6000 lumen lighting kit for one of my Drones.
And even it's not as bright a that from a distance.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Hahaha.

I'll be sure to let them know.

And yes, most of the videos I receive are IFOS.
Being in my position with the organization I'm in, I've seen and heard it all.
I am one the hardest to stump on this subject.

I have a 97% solve rate.
When one of my investigators try to disposition a case as an Unknown, it gets further put under my microscope.
If there is any doubt in my mind that a rational explanation is most likely the cause, then it gets coded that way.

Never once have I claimed something was alien.
It's classified as unexplained.
And just because I can't explain it, doesn't mean someone else can't.
Hence why I posted the video here.

'Link to video download' Seems more appropriate. I don't appreciate being linked right to a download.

Alien artifact or it didn't happen
Or at least a tall and interesting tale.

a reply to: Antipathy17

Are you on a desktop or mobile?

I know the CMS will ask you to download the video if you on one or the other.
I'm on my Ipad, and it's a video stream.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

It could be that the aliens helped with the development of mobile camera and drone tech, specifically because their usual clocking technology was bugging out.
It's perfect cover to hide in plain sight.

Just added the second video

I think it's someone shining a torch on a street lamp or other pole mounted object, about a block away from the camera.

a reply to: Macenroe82

I have a 97% solve rate.

Should be 99.9999%

a reply to: Macenroe82

Super weird as the camera man said about 50 times lol

Surely its someone with a fast mini drone

Skip to 2.22

Skip to 1.22

And finally...


As you can see drone speed is ridiculous 145mph+... And 2 of those video's are from 2015!!
So i would go with a drone with a light on it.

Maybe, maybe not

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

It means that I could be absolutely anything before we jump to UFO.

What does the U in UFO stand for?

The towns airport is just on the other side of those trees, then there's a large open farm fields.

I called the airport and spoke to the manager, he said the only aircraft that came in that day was at Noon.
He then said it's not the first time hes heard of odd lights in the area.

Then he told me the airport has two cameras - one facing North, the other facing east and that he will pull the footage for the hour in question and will send it to me.
Very nice older man.

Didnt seem the least bit phased about odd lights in the area.

I'm wondering if he's referring to the 1970s flap nicknamed Charlie Red Star, which became a very well known series cases in his area.


The witness is 2 km south from the airport.
If the airports cameras didn't pick anything up, then the object is in relatively close proximity to the witness and most likely some sort of drone or LED kite.