-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -28-

a reply to: Guyfriday

Wow, threw me a curve ball on that post. Damn, good one too.

I can understand enough to say you're not crazy and the hidden agenda behind the DNA push resonates with some of my thinking on it. What I can't agree to nor disagree on is the two bloodline feuds simply because I lack the historical knowledge to know any better. I know you've post pounded on Trotskyism for a long while so, I got some homework to do. May have to file this one in my 'bigger than anyone can imagine' category.

a reply to: 1010set

sigh. i just typed up a long response but when i tried to post i got logged out and now its gone... anyway ive been here a while and blind faith is never good but i choose to have an apprehensive belief in Q based on what i see, as well as their core message.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

I'm a bit spooked by your list of bloodline families because I was at a catholic boarding school with a Sforza, a Conti and a Colonna... along with the odd prince or two.

Nah, I wouldn't worry about it. I was surrounded by Freemasons & Italian mobsters my whole childhood. I don't think I have any suppressed memories. 😳

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: crankyoldman

Hmmmm. Was Joes speech DeepFake, or pre-recorded and edited to get rid of any gaffes? They KNOW they can’t let him speak live on TV.

Probably. Would you let a guy whose wearing depends do that speech?

So my guess is they prerecorded it, then trotted him out to speak to the preselected media drones. He more or less lip synched it so the drones who went reeeeeee when fireworks were announced were none the wiser. None of them ever would have said it was fake anyway, if they could tell.

Hell, a lot more concerts are lip synched then people know. The ridiculously dark stage made it easier.

File under "one playbook."

House passes money for Post Office Bill.

Senate Refuses to take it up, citing no need.

A drunk-ass Pelosi takes to her podium and says "they are a threat to our democracy." Press repeats.

How many time can chicken little scream before some just steps on it?

a reply to: crankyoldman

Didn't the Post Office say they didn't even need that money?

Why does Nancy the Idiotic Drunk Hater make everything so hard on The People?

a reply to: Guyfriday

Guyfriday, re The Eight... have you read "The EIGHT" by Katherine Neville (1988)? ...about a Chess set through history.

It covers a pagan traditional walk around Venice in a figure of Eight - but also to do with saints, from memory. It seems to cover a lot of the Italian families, as well as Montglane Abbey, Napoleon, Corsica, Russia.

I just wondered whether it matches up with the history you're aware of?


(I've read it once a decade for 3 decades - once I pick it up I just can't put it down).

a reply to: Guyfriday

Cheers for confirming the Quantative Easing with detail!

a reply to: queenofswords

The Post Office got a 10 billion dollar line of credit in the CARES Act and have not even touched it yet.

They could’ve had somebody else reading it In the other room like Jordan Peele did with Obama.

Except it was exactly like another speech he already read. I can’t find it anymore but there’s a comparison between the speech and his 2008 speech.

Nothing is real.

Read this article it couldn’t be further from the truth

QAnon Cultists, Emboldened By Trump, Rally In Hollywood To Spread Dangerous Conspiracies

m.huffpost.com...

Anyone can just go to a Q website and look at all 3000+ of his posts and see for themselves the ideology presented.

I can’t believe what I am seeing all day everyday.

It is truly an amazing time to be alive

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: crankyoldman

Why does Nancy the Idiotic Drunk Hater make everything so hard on The People?

Wrong Q-uestion.

Nancy's crew thinks of it this way, "Why do these people make everything so damn hard on us."

Then it makes sense.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

Didn’t They also get a bunch of ammo?

originally posted by: Sakiale
a reply to: 1010set

sigh. i just typed up a long response but when i tried to post i got logged out and now its gone... anyway ive been here a while and blind faith is never good but i choose to have an apprehensive belief in Q based on what i see, as well as their core message.

A little background on myself may be in order. I should have done an Intro Post, but it's a little late for that.

I spent 12 years in the service. The first 8 as an C-130 Flight Engineer before an injury took me off the flight-deck. I thought my username may have given that away. The last 4 I was assigned as an Criminal Investigator for the Northeast Command Region stationed in Philly. Due to me being responsible for comms, and other things, I held an TS-SCI my entire career. Because of this, I caught some juicy cases and often collaborated with USSS and the FBI. Nothing Q has transmitted is any thing I recognize. This doesn't mean any thing in and of itself. It's just I'm not familiar with it, nor does it fit any pattern I'm used to.

I'll admit I didn't take this thread seriously when I first decided to engage. I'm an agnostic. I tend to shut down the moment any thing metaphysical, religious or paranormal is brought up. I'm a well trained and experienced investigator. First Aircraft Mishaps, then criminal investigations, and now Industrial Mishaps. What did catch my attention is the DOJs reluctance to pursue investigations into what I find to be demonstrable criminal activity with intent. This would be why I am now more interested than my original curiosity.

Having said the above, it's the contradictions and failed "predictions" that keep me from embracing the movement completely. As well as the metaphysical angles. Also, Q is not needed any longer even if he/her/they are legit. I'm late to the party, but can state that citizens with enough capital and a well networked legal circle can bring down the entire tent. I have neither, and again, am not fully onboard.

Does Q not keep telling you "You have more than you know!"? That to me sounds like a call to action.

@JamesWoods has 2.5 million followers, and retweeted the observation tweet as an image. Within seconds this "symbol" will be exposed within the minds of folks around the world.

Now, the "once seen, cannot be unseen" effect is in full play here.

Not one single person who now sees this in this manner can be convinced it wasn't deliberate. How brilliant is that???


9:29 8/21/20

A follow up tweet adds...



Now the latter will be hard for many to grasp, but the former will be easy.


Apr 3 2018 20:18:12 (EST)
Check the date stamp of the original 8-21 (mirrored)

Symbolism will be their downfall.

a reply to: crankyoldman

6.5 feet is 78 inches.

78
Reposts
Anonymous
5 Nov 2017 - 12:15:52 AM
[Repost Lost]
Disinformation is real.
Distractions are necessary.
SA is the primary, US is secondary, (Asia/EU)...
Alice & Wonderland.
Q

[Repost Lost]
What was POTUS' last Tweet (prior to)?
To who was it addressed?
When was POTUS' Twitter taken down?
Why is this relevant?
What was POTUS' last Tweet (prior to)?
Who was it addressed to specifically?
When was POTUS' Twitter taken down?
Has this ever happened before?
Why now?
Coincidence?
How many times did the attack occur (secondary clean up)?
What is the purpose of tracking?
What is the purpose of disruption?
Why did POTUS have military guards (uniform) while in HI?
Why is this relevant?
Do military guards (uniform) typically assist the USSS?
Why is this relevant?
What flying object was recently shot down?
Why is this relevant?
How precise is geo tracking (non-public c-level pro)?
Why is this relevant?
Alice & Wonderland.
Q

[Repost Lost]
Q = Alice
You'll soon understand the meaning behind Alice "&" Wonderland.
Everything has meaning.
God bless.
Q

a reply to: 1010set

Having said the above, it's the contradictions and failed "predictions" that keep me from embracing the movement completely. As well as the metaphysical angles. Also, Q is not needed any longer even if he/her/they are legit. I'm late to the party, but can state that citizens with enough capital and a well networked legal circle can bring down the entire tent. I have neither, and again, am not fully onboard.

Does Q not keep telling you "You have more than you know!"? That to me sounds like a call to action.

101 this may help to explain the "predictions" issue, which really isn't an issue from one POV. HERE

So preliminary, but on a phone rn so notable to share, just from the links. Wiki- to Palau- president- secret society of china. Sauce there. Then trusteship of Palau, Truman, then Clinton. He appears to be current. Seems the main GDP here is slavery and sex trafficking. Notables- big on the climate change stage.

I'm ten minutes in. We have goods here, I'm thinking bigger and on a more notably complicit scale........reply to: nisei

And a pentagram, missed the other part nice catch.. a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

a reply to: crankyoldman

cranky, re-reading your POV post reminded me of the conclusion early on that, whilst Q/NSA knows everything, a lot of their information is not admissable in court; for example some may be known through access to an illegal CIA data base.

We concluded that Q/NSA therefore needed us to pinpoint open source information from the net that IS admissable in court and leads to the same conclusions.


I'm just wondering what percentage of that open source information we have managed to highlight to them so far?