Standalone Vaccine unlikely to be used for Population control.

I was looking into something for my sister, and I found a vaccine presentation marked confidential. I took screen shots of each slide.

So, it's gates foundation

It says confidential. The rest seemed unremarkable until I got to Slide 13 about Paratyphoid Vaccine where it says

"Standalone vaccine unlikely to be used for population control"

I would love feedback on this.

Obviously the conspiracy theorist in me is taking the population control statement literally.

It does not sound like they are talking about a population of bacteria.



www.who.int...

Slide 1



Slide 13



Other slides in order from 2 on























Slide 13 at top

Lets start here:
"Population control" does not imply killing people.

What does it mean to you?

a reply to: HalWesten

Who, me?

It means controlling the rate of growth.

Correct, but it does imply preventing people.

It seems to infer that there are standalone vaccines or a combination of vaccines that are in fact used for population control.

a reply to: Phage

a reply to: BadBoYeed

It seems to infer that there are standalone vaccines or a combination of vaccines that are in fact used for population control.

What in your "presentation" infers this, exactly?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: HalWesten

Who, me?

It means controlling the rate of growth.

Of course you. I was curious. I read it the same way.

a reply to: HalWesten

Ok.
Seems we're getting definitions sorted.
Now we need for the OP to tell us what the hell he's talking about.

Or can you explain it? Because he sure didn't.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: HalWesten

Who, me?

It means controlling the rate of growth.

Take the Poison Pretty Please .........

BB, I don't think it's any secret that Gates and people like him was to reduce the global population, forced vaccines to slow or reverse population growth is what they hope to see at some point. They think they're smarter than everyone else in the world and know what's best for us. Pure evil.

What it means is that whoever put this presentation together did what most researchers and scientists do and don't choose they're words properly.

There are better ways to describe controlling viral/bacteria/disease spread than "population control."

The presentation is most likely put together to be presented to other researchers and scientists who already have a contextual understanding.

Taken out of context it is easy for someone not a part of the group to misconstrue what is being talked about.

Researchers and scientists, especially those who study the human body and related issues, tend to come across as cold or detached from emotional responses, and that's because it's necessary to remove one's self from the emotional aspects to be able to consider just the facts, and it allows for one to have an easier time to be unbiased.

Now, are they talking about human population control, or disease population control?

Going over the material presented it most likely they're talking about population control of the topic disease.

Edit to add:
That being said I still don't put it past Gates and his cohorts to be above trying to attain human population reduction.

a reply to: BadBoYeed
The author is a Paediatrician.

Does that make it easier or worse for you?

a reply to: AutomateThis1

That being said I still don't put it past Gates and his cohorts to be above trying to attain human population reduction.

You are inferring something which has not been implied.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: HalWesten

Who, me?

It means controlling the rate of growth.

What does Occam’s Razor mean again?

Please show us where this terminology is used in the manner you present.

You may be right. But the terminology, especially when considering Gates involvement — is suspect.

a reply to: KKLOCO

www.wisegeek.com...

originally posted by: HalWesten
BB, I don't think it's any secret that Gates and people like him was to reduce the global population, forced vaccines to slow or reverse population growth is what they hope to see at some point. They think they're smarter than everyone else in the world and know what's best for us. Pure evil.

You have to see it from their perspective; these are captains of industry; they have the means to solve a lot of the worlds problems; the world continues to demand that they solve the world's problems....

.... the problem is the world might not like their solutions.

originally posted by: Phage
Lets start here:
"Population control" does not imply killing people.

Totally agree. A population can be controlled by many means.

You can sterilize the female population of a specific undesirable group by pushing an STD preventative, you can literally control a population by getting a vaccine approved that ends up making the users to become addictive to the treatment, or sure you can just go and kill people but that doesn't make much sense since there are laws against doing that.

I don't think there are many if any laws to prevent elective sterilization by people, or by allowing people to become addictive to something else. Populations are so easy to control in the long run of things.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: KKLOCO

www.wisegeek.com...

Did you look at what was in the link you posted?

It’s all about population control, in the sense the OP pointed to.

a reply to: KKLOCO

Yes. I did read it. Did you?

Population control, or more specifically human population control, is a term that usually refers to various national government programs and policies that aim to slow the growth of a country's population.

Sounds like what I said, doesn't it? Just a little?

It means controlling the rate of growth.

a reply to: Phage

How can this be put into context with a ‘Paratyphoid Vaccine’?

Doesn’t seem like the proper place for the phrase ‘population control’.

I did read Automates post, that’s the only logical explanation.

Unless you can enlighten us?