It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
link
Stochastic resonance (SR) is a phenomenon where a signal that is normally too weak to be detected by a sensor, can be boosted by adding white noise to the signal, which contains a wide spectrum of frequencies. The frequencies in the white noise corresponding to the original signal's frequencies will resonate with each other, amplifying the original signal while not amplifying the rest of the white noise (thereby increasing the signal-to-noise ratio which makes the original signal more prominent). Further, the added white noise can be enough to be detectable by the sensor, which can then filter it out to effectively detect the original, previously undetectable signal.
Turns out, to the extent that a few minutes of googling around can reveal, it’s not an easy question to answer. It’s certainly true that the photoreceptors in a frog’s eye are sensitive enough to trigger on individual photons — indeed, researchers are using frog’s eyes to help fashion hybrid light-detector technology. But on the other hand, human photoreceptors are also sensitive enough to trigger on individual photons — and yet, we don’t as a matter of fact actually see photons one at a time. The presumption is that we would be seeing too much noise if our brains actually responded to such low levels of light; in practice, it seems to take several dozen photons before a human will say they see something.
So maybe the same is true for frogs? I wasn’t able to find a definitive-sounding word on the subject, but there is good reason to believe that frogs are at least much more sensitive than we are. The point is that noise we filter out is roughly proportional to body temperature. In a warm-blooded creature, simple thermal motions are constantly jostling the rhodopsin molecules in the eye, which could mimic the act of seeing something. A cold-blooded frog isn’t as susceptible to this problem, so its vision can be usefully much more efficient at low light levels.
However upon reading wikipedia it appears to be over-excited neurons in your brain... or something like that.
originally posted by: St Udio
a reply to: Bent8484
pretty Iffy …
but it is clear that there is something not regular in the Brain/Neural Pathways...
the majority of people visualize in am Analog type of sequence... and a frame-by-frame image becomes apparent at times
but the OP has the distinct visuals which suggest an obvious 'digital format' instead of the ubiquitous Analog, movie screen which most of us use some 99% of the time
when I Astral Travel my panoramic surroundings are crisp/clear/ high definition/lucid visuals … instead of the inferior, dim and uncrisp images created in the Analog/frame-by-frame mode of 3rd Eye visualizations
the OP is fortunate, imho,
re DaRAGE:
However upon reading wikipedia it appears to be over-excited neurons in your brain... or something like that.
originally posted by: Poveglia
originally posted by: St Udio
So, do you have any insights into this..
your promising condition should be honed to HD 4G clarity.... it should be a nice adaptation to survive the fast approaching Technocracy Cabal of Despots who will be busy culling the general population , to the Georgia Guidestones levels by 2030
One might be poetic in saying you are an example of the coming elevated individuals to inhabit the Aquarian Age that dawned in year 2020/Winter of 2019
demonic possessed internet-of-everything Devices... will not cloud you mind or vision with delusions, as Prophecied