It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: KnoxMSP
Oh for home defense, I must not have read thoroughly. If I was just going for home defense I would get a full frame .45 (if not worried about collateral damage in other rooms), a Remi 500, or a PCC like an AR9, Ruger PC9, or Keltec Sub 2000. 9mm in hollow point has less chance of collateral damage than a lot of other rounds.
Have not used a Canik or Stoeger but they look like affordable full frame 9's based on a good design from the Israeli military.
originally posted by: KnoxMSP
a reply to: FlyingFox
Man, I want one for just a cheap, throw in the dirt, carbine!
I am building a new AR9 with a friend who builds guns for an AR parts manufacturer. All the upgraded parts, coated and everything. It should be a sweet home defense rig. Will be my first time assembling one from parts. I am excited.
originally posted by: KnoxMSP
a reply to: circuitsports
I have children's bedroom's adjacent to mine. I can't go to the bigger stuff. Too much penetration with .308, blackout, 223/556, etc. I need short barrel for in the house stuff. I have other rifles with longer barrels for long distance.
originally posted by: PaddyInf
Never make a decision based on threads like these. They tend to be full of people with bias based on either experience with only 1 or 2 of the guns, or who no experience at all. You usually end up with pissing contests about make, calibres etc, despite the fact that most quality brand guns work, and that the difference in real world effectiveness between 9mm, .40 and .45 are negligible.
All of the guns you mention in the OP are solid choices for personal defence. Best thing you could do is get your hands on them and test fire if you can.
Happy shooting!