It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
He was charged as a result of a LaGrange Police Department investigation initiated in February 2011. According to prosecutors, police were alerted to more than 600 suspected child porn files linked to a computer in LaGrange, which led them to the television station Mallory operated. More than 26,000 files of child pornography were seized. “The evidence demonstrated that Mallory knowingly and intentionally sought out, gathered, downloaded and saved these images and videos of children being raped, tortured and sexually exploited,” Cranford said in a prior news release.
The invasion of privacy counts stemmed from a hidden camera Mallory installed in his office that he used to secretly record young women, Cranford said.
Cranford advocated against Mallory’s release in a December letter to the parole board. Mallory was first eligible for parole in December 2019, seven years after his conviction. According to a parole board spokesman, Mallory’s eligibility was determined by Georgia’s sentencing laws for consecutive sentences, despite the length of his sentence.
“The evidence shows that Mallory is sexually deviant and commits these crimes by compulsion as much as by choice,” he said in the letter. “In the current digital age, no amount of supervision can stop a compulsive sexual deviant like Mallory from seeking out the most heinous images and videos of small children being sexually abused.”Two victims involved in the case also opposed parole, Cranford said. At a minimum, they asked that Mallory be banned from Troup County and from contacting them if he was released.
“Mallory’s crimes did not allow for the state to seek or the trial court to impose a sentence without parole eligibility, and parole is a power exercised exclusively by the State Board of Pardons and Paroles,” Cranford said Tuesday in the statement.In an April response to Cranford, the parole board said earlier release was possible due to “performance incentive credits.” Board spokesman Steve Hayes said Mallory actually served five months in prison beyond the date he was eligible for release by law and the board followed its guidelines system to determine his parole.“The clemency recommendation was for a parole release at eligibility,” Hayes said in an email to AJC.com. “Mallory was released five months later. His parole release is not COVID-19 related.”
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: StallionDuck
The parole officers that make the decision for him to be released probably did under compassionate grounds, they are probably kiddie fondlers too and felt sorry for him, birds of a feather.
originally posted by: StallionDuck
All great points!
I agree.. This would lead me to suspect preferred treatment, meaning it's possible that those allowing the parole so soon could have been in on it. I would be very suspicious.
Imagine the people who were victims... what do they feel about justice now. Probably not much. They're going to feel overlooked and forgotten.
I really just don't understand this obvious erosion of our justice system. It's right there in your face. That's one hell of a mockery to law biding citizens. Sadly... Governors and Presidents aren't held responsible for stuff like this, much less judges and parole boards.
Someone needs to step up and start cleaning house in this country - I mean really get in there with a toothbrush and clear those cracks.... Lay traps and poison the rest and lite them all up...
Passionate and persuasive, Rep. Barnard shepherded every bill introduced in the Georgia Legislature that had any impact on the Department of Corrections during his years in office. In 1995-1996, Mr. Barnard guided through the Georgia House, the frame work for the State Sex Offenders Registry and Sexual Predators Review Board. As a result interested parties may learn if a convicted sex offender is living in a neighborhood of interest.
Oh no where to begin.
First why do we have outrageous sentencing declarations 1000 years, Is there some life extension technology out there? why not just say life in prison?
and 1,000 is not anywhere close to seven years thats not even a one fourth. what?!
HOw do these people get away with things like this??
originally posted by: madmac5150
***WARNING: EXTREME DEJA-VU MOMENT AHEAD***
This guy will be a Democrat superstar...
The Clintons probably have a job waiting for him... it's a no-brainer...
Even better, he can run for governor, lose... and blame voter suppression and discrimination against pedophile-americans...
***END: EXTREME DEJA-VU WARNING***
originally posted by: Robbo2006
originally posted by: madmac5150
***WARNING: EXTREME DEJA-VU MOMENT AHEAD***
This guy will be a Democrat superstar...
The Clintons probably have a job waiting for him... it's a no-brainer...
Even better, he can run for governor, lose... and blame voter suppression and discrimination against pedophile-americans...
***END: EXTREME DEJA-VU WARNING***
Well the sniffing children job was taken a while ago, The Dems seem to be fine with that as it’s their children put under his nose. PLEASE don’t abuse your children Dems.
Because Pedophilia is being normalised.
originally posted by: PhilbertDezineck
a reply to: StallionDuck
Did they castrate the pervert before releasing him back into society?