It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
It's just an inference which I was drawing from the multiple complaint threads over the years saying "There aren't enough threads about X,Y,Z, and too much politics instead". That implies a demand for more threads on other topics. The demand must be coming from the people who want to read threads, and isn't being met by the people who write them.
Two questions:
How many people does it take to keep a thread active?
Does the same 5 people circularly patting each other on the back in agreement - qualify as a topic in demand?
originally posted by: StallionDuck
What I see are people who know how to send their point across and unless you have a valid counter, you can't really do anything but 'be triggered'. These people come from all ends of the spectrum, not just one political side but many.
I can't disagree more. When a faction of people can decide what facts are 'facts' and what facts are 'fake news', systematically disparage opposing views through an onslaught of pejorative name-calling, and winnow what are acceptable sources of information down to QAnon, 4-channel, and the Whitehouse there ceases to be any point or margin in 'discussion' and debate. Valid, sourced, factual counter-arguments be damned.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: neformore
I know this isn't what you like to hear....but since Googles decision i have purchased at least 1000 rounds of ammo.
originally posted by: Harte
I want to add that I don't recall this idyllic time when ATS was so civil.
I've been here for quite some time and even from the start I had to avoid the political section due to the posters being even worse than me (LOL.)
9/11 and Bush. You don't remember how people were treated that tried to argue against the ridiculous crap that was posted about that subject?
All the BS about PNAC and the Neoconservatives?
Realizing this is a conspiracy site and would thus contain a whole lot of obsessed haters, it still shocked me to read what idiots will write.
Harte
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Ahabstar
I've spent some time talking with people I know and consider to be the smartest people in my realm. How to monetize ATS is something that, without a massive media support structure, is not within the knowledgbase of any of them. Of course, we are talking about dinosaurs, relatively speaking, that are as comfortable doing their business with excel as anything else. So there's that.
But i cannot fathom how this site could be monetized. The only 2 ways I can envision are another 3rd party ad service that isn't within Googles control. That is a years long endeavor to create...i don't think it'll help here. The other is to be absorbed into the fold of a larger corporate entity that already infrastructure in place to deploy for more enriched content like video, etc. I think that in a world with UFO and cryptids, a vine/tiktok ability would be a prong of attack at gaining audience among a newer audience. Problem is...infrastructure. We know video's can be monetized, though...and if they are moderated well enough to prevent the ire of Google's ad service (i.e., no political rants, as they lead to verbiage that Google seems to not like) then it could be part of a plan. For example.
I wouldn't be surprised if "fringe" sites like ATS start adopting that model at an accelerating rate as the screws tighten on the internet at large.
originally posted by: Hanslune
originally posted by: Harte
I want to add that I don't recall this idyllic time when ATS was so civil.
I've been here for quite some time and even from the start I had to avoid the political section due to the posters being even worse than me (LOL.)
9/11 and Bush. You don't remember how people were treated that tried to argue against the ridiculous crap that was posted about that subject?
All the BS about PNAC and the Neoconservatives?
Realizing this is a conspiracy site and would thus contain a whole lot of obsessed haters, it still shocked me to read what idiots will write.
Harte
Hey Harte when did you go all soft and mushy! I didn't realize ATS was ailing
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
Somebody mentioned here r/conspiracy on Reddit? I'm a subscriber myself. It's decent, though if you're trying to avoid politics at all costs, you won't be able to escape much of it there either.