Video showing Warlord RAZ handing out guns in the CHAZ

originally posted by: Spacespider
Give them 2 days to move out before military go in hot.
Enough of this

Trumps not calling in the military and its smart not to do so.

If he did the media would jump on him and say see he is a dictator. These governors and mayors that have let there situation get this ugly to bait him into doing that.

Instead Trump seems to be running the narrative of states rights and it is their responsibility to get their house in order.He is willing to offer assistance of the national guard if they ask and he has the emergency power to do so right now.

But why bother when all these democrat states are both making themselves look like dictators and completely incompatent at the same time the very thing they have accused trump is.

Trump is likely using feds and marshals to get to the bigger fish behing the scenes that are really pulling the strings

as bad as chaz looks they are just the "PAWNS" the "USEFUL IDIOTS" ..you gotta go for the bigger pieces the "ROOKS" and the "BISHOPS" to finaly checkmate the "KING."

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: RazorV66
Raz is the leader of the Seattle chapter of ISIS.
Drone him.

The people of Seattle like the excitement there apparently. As long as it's contained within that city, let the warlords, terrorists, robbers, rapists, and other assorted criminals have the place.

All we need is Air Force One to crash near there and have Trump stuck in CHOP or CHAV.

We'll need to send in Snake Plissken.

??..I heard he was dead!

and I thought he would be taller




In all seriousness though, where did he get those firearms from in the first place?

He should be made to show documentation for those perfectly legal and registered weapons..

Respectfully,
~meathead

Think of 'SPAZ' as a Zoo...where visitors can observe Alt-Leftards in their natural environment.
Zoos are educational...and fun for the whole family.

And Remember...Saturday is AK Day...free guns for the kids.

a reply to: Liquesence

Doesn't the Second state clearly that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed?

Haven't we been told for years that any restrictions on firearms are unconstitutional?

Therefore, licensing laws in Seattle are unconstitutional.

So ... one has to ask from people holding that position ... why they are worried about anyone handing out guns?

It's an American citizens right to bear those arms.

Unless ... there's something different about these citizens?

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Think of 'SPAZ' as a Zoo...where visitors can observe Alt-Leftards in their natural environment.
Zoos are educational...and fun for the whole family.

And Remember...Saturday is AK Day...free guns for the kids.

Hey, and bonus points for calling people animals because you disagree with their politics.

Are they savages as well?

All I see is Americans rather than left or right but seeing as it seems to be the left that get accused of this protest here is some balance, this lady is African American and republican in the "chaz zone", so its not all just one side making a protest against police brutality

Apropos of not much ...

I support the Second Amendment fully. I have also said many times that based on the SCOTUS decision in Heller, it's obvious, even to the most right-wing member, that there are some limits on all rights. I favor as few legal restrictions on our rights as possible, but the matter of gun licensing and control of commerce, is left to the States under the Tenth Amendment.

There are those here who believe that there can be no legal limitations on the Second.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Think of 'SPAZ' as a Zoo...where visitors can observe Alt-Leftards in their natural environment.
Zoos are educational...and fun for the whole family.

And Remember...Saturday is AK Day...free guns for the kids.

Hey, and bonus points for calling people animals because you disagree with their politics.

Are they savages as well?

Humans ARE animals.

In lieu of your imaginary "bonus points" I'll take a star.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Think of 'SPAZ' as a Zoo...where visitors can observe Alt-Leftards in their natural environment.
Zoos are educational...and fun for the whole family.

And Remember...Saturday is AK Day...free guns for the kids.

Hey, and bonus points for calling people animals because you disagree with their politics.

Are they savages as well?

Humans ARE animals.

In lieu of your imaginary "bonus points" I'll take a star.

LOL ... fair enough.

Thanks for the correction.

a reply to: Gryphon66

You

Haven't we been told for years that any restrictions on firearms are unconstitutional?

Then it should be easy for you to post such quotes cited from ATS threads.

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Gryphon66

You

Haven't we been told for years that any restrictions on firearms are unconstitutional?

Then it should be easy for you to post such quotes cited from ATS threads.

It would, except that's against T&C.

Anyone who repeatedly emphasizes "shall not be infringed" is staking that claim, right?

a reply to: SolAquarius

He's in for a severe spanking, lol

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Gryphon66

You

Haven't we been told for years that any restrictions on firearms are unconstitutional?

Then it should be easy for you to post such quotes cited from ATS threads.

It would, except that's against T&C.

Anyone who repeatedly emphasizes "shall not be infringed" is staking that claim, right?

Then please by all means link to such a post on ATS.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Gryphon66

You

Haven't we been told for years that any restrictions on firearms are unconstitutional?

Then it should be easy for you to post such quotes cited from ATS threads.

It would, except that's against T&C.

Anyone who repeatedly emphasizes "shall not be infringed" is staking that claim, right?

This is against the T&C?

From thread “ Death by Gun Control...The truth about gun control laws...“

originally posted by: cdesigns
“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government”

– Thomas Jefferson –

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: neutronflux

My understanding is that we can link to another thread of discussion but that cross-posting actual material from discussion to discussion is against T&C, yes.

However, I really don't have to prove that the most common response here to gun control laws is "what don't you understand about 'shall not be infringed'"

I feel certain in claiming that as common knowledge.

a reply to: Gryphon66

You made this claim?

Haven't we been told for years that any restrictions on firearms are unconstitutional

Please by all means link to who here at ATS was making such claims.

So? It was innuendo then?

a reply to: Gryphon66
Nobody is challenging their right to own firearms.

The scariest thing in the video is the total lack of knowledge on how to handle the guns. That's really what has everybody unnerved.

You don't give a complete newbie rookie a gun and send them out on patrol in public within 30 seconds of holding one for the first time in their life. He can't shoot it, he can't carry it safely, he doesn't even know what a target would look like. This is literally the most dangerous, irresponsible thing I have ever seen with a firearm.

I think people rarely if ever experience someone with this level of incompetence with a gun when they say the second shouldn't have any restrictions at all.

a reply to: SouthernForkway26

Hmmm ... I can't say what others intentions are, I can only see what the words are.

And I have seen the words that claim that "there are no limitations on the 2nd" who then turn around and claim that these folks didn't have the right to CARRY in the CHOP by direct implication that the weapons would be used illegally.

a reply to: Gryphon66

I get trying to make a point, but making yourself look this foolish to do so is risky.

There are rules about possessing weapons. We may not like some of them, or agree with some of them, but as many of us try to abide by the laws as written, tend to get irritated when others ignore the law. That means, we don't like the law, but follow it, because that's what it takes to have a healthy society. If you disagree, I'd ask of you ever had kids and let them make the rules as they go?

Handing weapons to a random kid who may or may not be proficient or even safe with that weapon is dangerous. Gun safety starts with the owner ensuring that all who handle the weapon understand the basic rules and follow them, or someone might get shot.

Why do we have laws in the first place?