It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Which is why society is at an impasse. I say it's NOT a nonstarter, that police are just as responsible for everything they did or did not do leading up to the confrontation, as they are for anything they do or do not do during and after the confrontation.
Fair enough... and I will simply point the many many instances of excess force that do not result in death, that may or may not result in serious and/or long-term injury, or just a little roughing up. But are no less unwarranted and unacceptable.
This man was so intoxicated he passed out in a Wendy’s drive through.
Which in this case was attempt to effect an entirely lawful arrest.
My point is that taking the position that they could have chosen to not enforce the law and therefore everything after that is their fault is a non starter. There was nothing in their behavior to be faulted. Other than your opinion that they could have and should have chosen to not make a lawful arrest.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Boadicea
I know you’re not a fan of watching the videos, and I’m certainly not trying to cajole you into it. I hope that given our interactions you trust my opinion enough to know that I’ll call it as I see it, for better or worse.
He was less than two parking spaces away from the first officer when he turned and pointed the taser at him.
There are certainly unjust laws out there, and those laws get enforced. But that’s a subject for another thread.
Sure, they could have let him secure the vehicle and taken him home. Called him a cab. Whatever. But none of that changes that it was entirely lawful, and they were as far from overbearing or responsible for escalation as possible.
Thank you for explaining that part. And are you sure that he was deliberately aiming it at the officers? It wasn't, perhaps, just turned with him turning around and unknowingly pointed at police? Not doubting you, just making sure on that point...
I think you are making a generalization about cops that is unfair to the vast majority.
I think you have no point.
originally posted by: Staffordshire1
a reply to: one4all
Wow strong words. You do understand the guy broke a law before cops spoke with him? You do realise that running is breaking another law? I won't mention the other laws broken.
Think about this, if a guy broke into your home took your gun and pointed it in your direction and your daughter or wife or whatever shot him? Self defense yes?
SMDH
originally posted by: GentrySociety
Question for anyone who is trained in restraining someone. How, can you restrain someones head to prevent them biting you unless you use the knee technique. I am guessing just asking nicely isn't going to work. My opinion will take heat as well, if you don't want a knee on the back of your neck, first don't be put on the ground, don't want to be put on the ground cooperate with the officer and do not resist arrest. These videos only show the aftermath of confrontations where the arresting officer has finally subdued the criminal. It is amazing that the Floyd video stopped filming between when he falls to ground and then to knee on back of neck. There be some video missing where the meth head giant of a man resisted arrest that i personally want to see. Scale from 1 to 10 how hard is it to restrain a meth head who is going bezerk resisting arrest. I watched the show cops seems like damn near impossible if you ask me. Anyway if anyone has the missing footage its probably next to the moon landing missing footage. a reply to: Fallingdown