It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: elysiumfire
Throughout the presentation I was waiting for Skouras to mention another element of the so-called 'Great Reset Plan', but he didn't mention it. So, let me bring that 'other' element which is definitely part of the Great Reset to the discussion. Not only will the technocrat leaders control populations, they will also control population numbers.
originally posted by: DrumsRfun
a reply to: Asktheanimals
Tech is going to control the planet, then you look at idiot Elon Musk who wants to put computers in our brains....and people WILL do it
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: Asktheanimals
See the irony?
The reset button is digital technology. Don't push it!!
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Asktheanimals
This has been the plan since at least 1991.
Democratising Global Governance:
The Challenges of the World Social Forum
by
Francesca Beausang
ABSTRACT
This paper sums up the debate that took place during the two round tables organized by UNESCO within the first World Social Forum in Porto Alegre (25/30 January 2001). It starts with a discussion of national processes, by examining democracy and then governance at the national level. It first states a case for a "joint" governance based on a combination of stakeholder theory, which is derived from corporate governance, and of UNESCO's priorities in the field of governance. As an example, the paper investigates how governance can deviate from democracy in the East Asian model. Subsequently, the global dimension of the debate on democracy and governance is examined, first by identification of the characteristics and agents of democracy in the global setting, and then by allusion to the difficulties of transposing governance to the global level.
www.unesco.org...
"the governments of Europe, the United States, and Japan are unlikely to negotiate a social-democratic pattern of globalization - unless their hands are forced by a popular movement or a catastrophe, such as another Great Depression or ecological disaster"
a reply to: KindraLaBelle
Maybe it's because I'm very close to being an atheist and I don't believe there is anything beyond this life, so the idea of healthy, strong, supper humans on a healthy planet, or planets, speaks to me
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: American-philosopher
Survival of the trial of the Gom Gabbar.
originally posted by: BiffTannen
a reply to: DrumsRfun
Its all about you. I imagine you are a lonely, not-at-all-missed twat. And what isn't your problem may in fact actually be problematic, especially if someone such as you were to have to shoulder such commitment and responsibility, but fortunately, your-self arresting attitude makes that a moot point.
Let's clearly delineate the population control /I'm/ referring to, for example :
* increasing access to contraceptives and birth control measures,
* incentivizing developing countries to lessen family sizes of 5-6+ members,
* promote child conception /only/ after both parents are financially stable,
* reinforcing the importance of two parent household.
from what I'm seeing called 'population control' as a massive culling of some large % of the wold population. To me that's not population control, THAT'S GENOCIDE, and no sane person would ever support that.
originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: Asktheanimals
Yes the world economic forum , that Klaus Schwab are really wanting horrible things to the 99% . I am sure they, less than 1% will have their money and luxury even after the reset .
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: Asktheanimals
Yes the world economic forum , that Klaus Schwab are really wanting horrible things to the 99% . I am sure they, less than 1% will have their money and luxury even after the reset .
That's the point. Broaden the gap between rich and poor and burn the ladder between the two.