It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Halfswede
So the fact that they completely lied about the photo op and the new report proves it is somehow irrelevant because it took so long to get the truth out? Did I get that right?
Trump Bible photo op not reason cops violently cleared George Floyd protest outside White House, feds claim
CNBC link in case anyone is bias concerned
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
So nothing to say about the Lafayette park clearing anymore?
Just hoping i'll respond to more insults?
Yeah, I think that it.
You'll need to come up with better material before I bite.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: IAMTAT
It's not so much the holding of the Bible. It's that Trump used the authorities to attack peaceful protesters so he could take this pointless photo-op.
But please explain to all of us how Trump's need to take a ridiculous picture supersedes the First Amendment.
originally posted by: UpThenDown
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
So nothing to say about the Lafayette park clearing anymore?
Just hoping i'll respond to more insults?
Yeah, I think that it.
You'll need to come up with better material before I bite.
Huh? what are you even going on about, please quote the post you are associating to me, i think in your constant posting you may have me confused with someone else
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: Nunyabizisit
Translated wrongly, I'm not a Dem.
Did I stutter? I meant the words as I wrote them. Stop flogging a dead horse.
Or is Trump still going to overturn the 2020 election?
I NEVER claimed that he would.
I do stand by the translation though.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: IAMTAT
It's not so much the holding of the Bible. It's that Trump used the authorities to attack peaceful protesters so he could take this pointless photo-op.
But please explain to all of us how Trump's need to take a ridiculous picture supersedes the First Amendment.
...
"The evidence we reviewed showed that the USPP cleared the park to allow a contractor to safely install antiscale fencing in response to destruction of Federal property and injury to officers that occurred on May 30 and May 31," reads an accompanying letter from Interior Department Inspector General Mark Lee Greenblatt. "Moreover, the evidence established that relevant USPP officials had made those decisions and had begun implementing the operational plan several hours before they knew of a potential Presidential visit to the park, which occurred later that day."
...