It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: tanstaafl
When People have lost arguments they start name calling.
And here's a nice article on thorium.
It says very clearly that thorium is years away from having its issues solved and then it would be decades to construct the reactors.
www.power-eng.com...
I agree the space shuttle program was harmful to NASA for the most part, costing a small fortune per launch. In hindsight, it seems like the Saturn family would have provided much greater payloads at an overall lower cost per pound and perhaps would not have suffered catastrophic failures like the shuttle.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: Bluntone22
Bureaucratic mess, yes, but I'm not sure I'd go as far as saying NASA's Space Shuttle program was a "failed program". They did launch 135 successful missions.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: ArMaP
They docking itself was autonomous. They did use manual control at one point for a test though.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: Bigburgh
Well, 'Bob & Doug' is the way everyone has been referring to them on the idiot box, hence my usage of the phrase.
I think someone thinks it's cute, but I don't care for it.
You know..."Bob & Doug, just a couple of hosers from the Great White North, eh?" As in, "Bob & Doug McKenzie"...and not a couple of NASA astronauts who just piloted the first manned commercial space mission to the International Space Station.
I'd be wanting to rebrand that if I was Space X.