It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: 19Bones79
I don't know about anywhere else, but the right to the throne of England is determined by Act of Parliament. 1701. Or is it 1702? If he's not a descendant of the Electress Sophia of Hanover, he stands no chance. Otherwise there is no such thing as a "rightful king of England".
originally posted by: CthruU
a reply to: 19Bones79
This rubbish has been circulating the net for 3 weeks now more intensly.
Latest is that the queen has fleed -bordered up Buckingham Palace and removed royal seals in obeyance of the supposed threats of exposure.
I can assure you he is not back yet and the gullibility of anyone who buys this rubbish needs to "up your game now y'hear?"
If he was back the claim would be for the whole world not certain parts at an absolute bare minimum.
This bloke is about as holy az a solid block of iron.
Honestly.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: one4all
But DNA is legally irrelevant.