Planned Parenthood admits under oath to trafficking baby body parts and organs

a reply to: Lumenari

Aaarrrggghh!! That lady looks like my grandma, she been gone 28 year, phew thought she was haunting me there for a sec. 😁

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

Abortion doesn't kill children.

That would be the military.

If they had lived, would they have become a tree or a rock or a deer?

THIS is exactly why I have an issue with you.

Intellectual dishonesty.

Abortion, by definition, kills children.

Care to change the definition?

originally posted by: makemap
a reply to: madmac5150

Yup, all started in the West where Science experiments continues from the Nazi regime. Asia never done this stuff until they got Westernized.

They weren't Westernized.

They were Darwinized.

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

Abortion doesn't kill children.

That would be the military.

If they had lived, would they have become a tree or a rock or a deer?

THIS is exactly why I have an issue with you.

Intellectual dishonesty.

Abortion, by definition, kills children.

Care to change the definition?

Remember when they were all screaming “Trump is killing the children”?
It’s all for show with them, just a facade to cover their hypocrisy.
It’s a badge of honor for them.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Lumenari

Please show me an organ donor card from a child killed by abortion?

That "card" would be in the hands of the woman who had an abortion and opted to donate her fetus' remains.

Which planned parenthood told her to do for a "free" abortion.

Supplied the form as well.

And then sold the body parts.

For money.

You have no problem at all with this business model.

Right?

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

Abortion doesn't kill children.

That would be the military.

If they had lived, would they have become a tree or a rock or a deer?

THIS is exactly why I have an issue with you.

Intellectual dishonesty.

Abortion, by definition, kills children.

Care to change the definition?

Remember when they were all screaming “Trump is killing the children”?
It’s all for show with them, just a facade to cover their hypocrisy.
It’s a badge of honor for them.

I'm wondering where we could argue that if the poster was aborted, then his parents didn't kill the poster.

a reply to: Sublimecraft
Well said.

a reply to: Lumenari

You have no problem at all with this business model.

Nope.

Hard to believe this country has been doing this for so long. Mostly because folks want to screw without birth control. One of the huge demonstrations as to why democracy is in such danger because so many lack personal responsibility and think it's ok to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Funny thing is the whole concept began to limit the population growth of a certain race of people and still the democrats find their way to there roots of labeling races as subhumans. Wonder why the earlier methods of population control aren't taught in school. I mean really marching over one shady fellow could turn into marching over millions of innocent babies.

Bet the Dems fear the day republicans wise up and tell the masses where abortion and planned parenthood got its solid footing in the abortion and race planning business.

Monsters murder unborn children, then profit from their death

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

Abortion doesn't kill children.

That would be the military.

If they had lived, would they have become a tree or a rock or a deer?

THIS is exactly why I have an issue with you.

Intellectual dishonesty.

Abortion, by definition, kills children.

Care to change the definition?

Remember when they were all screaming “Trump is killing the children”?
It’s all for show with them, just a facade to cover their hypocrisy.
It’s a badge of honor for them.

I'm wondering where we could argue that if the poster was aborted, then his parents didn't kill the poster.

I'm confused. Are you arguing against fetal remains being trafficked, or the fact that women have the right to abort their fetuses?

a reply to: tinktinktink

Bet the Dems fear the day republicans wise up and tell the masses where abortion and planned parenthood got its solid footing in the abortion and race planning business.

Republican women have just as many, if not more, abortions than Democrats. Christian women account for more abortions than atheists.

But again, are you upset about donated fetal remains being used by science, or that women are choosing to have abortions?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Lumenari

You have no problem at all with this business model.

Nope.

So how many children do you have and how many abortions have you had?

You know, to put this conversation into context.

?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

Abortion doesn't kill children.

That would be the military.

If they had lived, would they have become a tree or a rock or a deer?

THIS is exactly why I have an issue with you.

Intellectual dishonesty.

Abortion, by definition, kills children.

Care to change the definition?

Remember when they were all screaming “Trump is killing the children”?
It’s all for show with them, just a facade to cover their hypocrisy.
It’s a badge of honor for them.

I'm wondering where we could argue that if the poster was aborted, then his parents didn't kill the poster.

I'm confused.

This surprises no-one given your logic versus expert level truth avoidance techniques mastered.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Lumenari

Abortion doesn't kill children.

That would be the military.

If they had lived, would they have become a tree or a rock or a deer?

THIS is exactly why I have an issue with you.

Intellectual dishonesty.

Abortion, by definition, kills children.

Care to change the definition?

Remember when they were all screaming “Trump is killing the children”?
It’s all for show with them, just a facade to cover their hypocrisy.
It’s a badge of honor for them.

I'm wondering where we could argue that if the poster was aborted, then his parents didn't kill the poster.

I'm confused. Are you arguing against fetal remains being trafficked, or the fact that women have the right to abort their fetuses?

You could have just stopped there.

Reply to my other post please.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Your full of it... Yeah its horrible to murder folks and sell their body parts.

To your ignorant denial of facts read over this

www.americamagazine.org...

Abortion and sterilization was originally a tool to keep the black population down. Its a fact spin it however you want but I will have sources and history on my side while you say it ain't so till your blue in the face.


Here have a liberal link to read about Mrs Thatcher careful it doesnt trigger you tho.
www.nyu.edu...

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
I'm confused. Are you arguing against fetal remains being trafficked, or the fact that women have the right to abort their fetuses?

Maybe, as I have posted before, when money is to be made sometimes abortions become first choice and pushed as first choice. Big bucks from the state for every one and big money on the side for the things like stem cells. I have always felt that this can be a recipe for disaster.

To put it in perspective in a down year of 2019 we only slaughtered 862,000

here we shut down the economy for 100k folks who had a fighting chance?
www.nbcnews.com...

trying to keep the liberal references coming so you dont trigger buddy. Take your time process it all its ok. What does it matter if the dems were murdering black babies and illegally sterilizing folks as long as the dems did it it wasnt racism right?

which makes me wonder since the majority of supporters of slavery were democrats why the outrage when so many willingly go vote yearly for the legacy of enslave,murder, and sterilize. It is definitely a confusing relationship.

At least now they try to legitimize it by claiming to sell the parts to science Hitler would be so proud.

a reply to: Xtrozero

Maybe, as I have posted before, when money is to be made sometimes abortions become first choice and pushed as first choice.

Women don't get paid to have abortions and then donate their fetal remains. Planned Parenthood is legally only allowed to charge what their actual costs to procure, keep and ship fetal remains. So, the only people making money are the middle men, who sell fetal parts to universities and research clinics, and they don't have any contact with the women seeking abortions.

Big bucks from the state for every one and big money on the side for the things like stem cells. I have always felt that this can be a recipe for disaster.

Less than the recipe for disaster with the demand for live organs. People get killed for their live organs often enough.

a reply to: Sublimecraft

So, you created this thread as an excuse to rag on women who have abortions. Where's your outrage for cadaver trafficking? Live organ donation?