It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: beyondknowledge
The link to the Ford Motor Company being in support of the Nazi war effort, in this video, is suspicious by the lack of mentioning General Motors. Both did business with Nazi Germany at the time and stopped shortly after the US declared war on the Axis powers after December 1941. As I have mentioned above, while Germany was at war with other countries, the US was not at war with Germany. Link
originally posted by: beyondknowledgeI find more and more things wrong with this video. I am not disputing the actual shooting analysis as it is logical but could use more evidence. The who, why, and how this was arranged is much in question.
originally posted by: beyondknowledgeIt even sounds like another 'Russia, Russia, Russia,' occurrence for the initial cause of the whole mess.
originally posted by: Cmajlz
The 18in guns on the Japanese battleships built before the start of WW2 were made in the US.
originally posted by: Bigbrooklyn
Check out the role of IBM in Nazi Germany.. IG Farben a jew owned chemical plant provided the Zyclon gases on their own...ww2 was about creating the state of Israel..a reply to: JoeGee
originally posted by: Bigbrooklyn
Check out the role of IBM in Nazi Germany.. IG Farben a jew owned chemical plant provided the Zyclon gases on their own...ww2 was about creating the state of Israel..a reply to: JoeGee
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: FlyingFox
There were no jets when WW2 broke out, and jet fuel = kerosene...which consists simply of a large cut of raw crude oil.
There were jet aircraft prototypes in 1939 that ran on gasoline.
originally posted by: charlyv
Back on topic, I do not think it is wise to believe everything in that very dated document, and especially because it is now a document banned on YT and now on a new "uncensored" site.
The main reason for doing some document banning is the publication of unproven or downright wrong scenarios as well.
I think there is really a mix of unvaluable(unreliable, heresay) and valuable (historically correct) info.
That puts it kind of in limbo, and YT does not like that as well.